Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era

This paper tries to examine the qualitative reality about current of belief “Penghayat Kepercayaan” dynamics in the Democratic Era. Penghayat Kepercayaan is a name for non-religious society or some people called as Agama Asli Nusantara. Becoming Penghayat will face some special challenges since the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mahestu Gayes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: EDP Sciences 2018-01-01
Series:E3S Web of Conferences
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187314016
id doaj-ef42009eab5545a28ec9e7bfd90308dd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef42009eab5545a28ec9e7bfd90308dd2021-02-02T03:40:44ZengEDP SciencesE3S Web of Conferences2267-12422018-01-01731401610.1051/e3sconf/20187314016e3sconf_icenis18_14016Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic EraMahestu Gayes0Department of Communication, Bina Nusantara UniversityThis paper tries to examine the qualitative reality about current of belief “Penghayat Kepercayaan” dynamics in the Democratic Era. Penghayat Kepercayaan is a name for non-religious society or some people called as Agama Asli Nusantara. Becoming Penghayat will face some special challenges since the society generally has negative stereotype towards them. The research method used was qualitative by using emic approach. The subject of this research was Penghayat Kepercayaan (the believers) who was covered by Majelis Luhur Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan YME Indonesia (MLKI). The informants were determined by using purposive sampling technique. The research finding was the democratic country generally considered the diversity and all citizens have the similar rights and obligations, however, until now, Penghayat Kepercayaan is struggling to get the acceptance especially for their identities. The new problem about the existence of Penghayat Kepercayaan in the social interaction will evoke their feelings of useless in actualizing their life and their occupations. The perspective towards the democracy of Pancasila by some Penghayat Kepercayaan did not represent enough their existence as the diversity in Indonesia, while for others, this current democracy had already fulfilled their needs.https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187314016Agama Asli NusantaraDemocracyEmicPenghayat Kepercayaan IndonesiaReligion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mahestu Gayes
spellingShingle Mahestu Gayes
Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
E3S Web of Conferences
Agama Asli Nusantara
Democracy
Emic
Penghayat Kepercayaan Indonesia
Religion
author_facet Mahestu Gayes
author_sort Mahestu Gayes
title Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
title_short Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
title_full Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
title_fullStr Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
title_full_unstemmed Emic Analysis Towards Penghayat Kepercayaan Dynamics in the Democratic Era
title_sort emic analysis towards penghayat kepercayaan dynamics in the democratic era
publisher EDP Sciences
series E3S Web of Conferences
issn 2267-1242
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This paper tries to examine the qualitative reality about current of belief “Penghayat Kepercayaan” dynamics in the Democratic Era. Penghayat Kepercayaan is a name for non-religious society or some people called as Agama Asli Nusantara. Becoming Penghayat will face some special challenges since the society generally has negative stereotype towards them. The research method used was qualitative by using emic approach. The subject of this research was Penghayat Kepercayaan (the believers) who was covered by Majelis Luhur Kepercayaan Terhadap Tuhan YME Indonesia (MLKI). The informants were determined by using purposive sampling technique. The research finding was the democratic country generally considered the diversity and all citizens have the similar rights and obligations, however, until now, Penghayat Kepercayaan is struggling to get the acceptance especially for their identities. The new problem about the existence of Penghayat Kepercayaan in the social interaction will evoke their feelings of useless in actualizing their life and their occupations. The perspective towards the democracy of Pancasila by some Penghayat Kepercayaan did not represent enough their existence as the diversity in Indonesia, while for others, this current democracy had already fulfilled their needs.
topic Agama Asli Nusantara
Democracy
Emic
Penghayat Kepercayaan Indonesia
Religion
url https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20187314016
work_keys_str_mv AT mahestugayes emicanalysistowardspenghayatkepercayaandynamicsinthedemocraticera
_version_ 1724307387813199872