Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism

This article investigates vulnerabilities related to commercial pressure and asks whether the ability to resist commercial temptations is class related. Four hypotheses are developed and tested in a nationally representative web survey among 1,707 respondents living in Norway. We found no difference...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lisbet Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2019-06-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856716
id doaj-ef3336ef26374176b414f68079cd03b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef3336ef26374176b414f68079cd03b42020-11-25T04:02:52ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402019-06-01910.1177/2158244019856716Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of CommercialismLisbet Berg0Oslo Metropolitan University, NorwayThis article investigates vulnerabilities related to commercial pressure and asks whether the ability to resist commercial temptations is class related. Four hypotheses are developed and tested in a nationally representative web survey among 1,707 respondents living in Norway. We found no differences in the ability to resist temptations between working-class and middle-class people, but the analysis gave some support to the conspicuous consumption hypothesis: Consumers from the upper middle class, with high purchasing power, reported to be the least able—or willing—to resist commercial temptations. Lacking ability to resist commercial temptations is an important vulnerability driver. Members of the upper middle class can normally afford their conspicuous consumption and can hardly be characterized as vulnerable. Members of the working class, however, are more vulnerable as measured by the tendency to buy things one cannot afford, even though they are better prepared to resist commercial temptations. The reason working class people are more likely to buy things they cannot afford is best explained by unequal class related distributions of financial opportunities, rather than by class in itself. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that self-reported class affiliation is a relevant approach for the study of social inequalities.https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856716
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Lisbet Berg
spellingShingle Lisbet Berg
Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
SAGE Open
author_facet Lisbet Berg
author_sort Lisbet Berg
title Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
title_short Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
title_full Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
title_fullStr Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
title_full_unstemmed Class Related Consumption and the Ability to Resist Commercial Temptations in the Age of Commercialism
title_sort class related consumption and the ability to resist commercial temptations in the age of commercialism
publisher SAGE Publishing
series SAGE Open
issn 2158-2440
publishDate 2019-06-01
description This article investigates vulnerabilities related to commercial pressure and asks whether the ability to resist commercial temptations is class related. Four hypotheses are developed and tested in a nationally representative web survey among 1,707 respondents living in Norway. We found no differences in the ability to resist temptations between working-class and middle-class people, but the analysis gave some support to the conspicuous consumption hypothesis: Consumers from the upper middle class, with high purchasing power, reported to be the least able—or willing—to resist commercial temptations. Lacking ability to resist commercial temptations is an important vulnerability driver. Members of the upper middle class can normally afford their conspicuous consumption and can hardly be characterized as vulnerable. Members of the working class, however, are more vulnerable as measured by the tendency to buy things one cannot afford, even though they are better prepared to resist commercial temptations. The reason working class people are more likely to buy things they cannot afford is best explained by unequal class related distributions of financial opportunities, rather than by class in itself. Overall, the analysis demonstrates that self-reported class affiliation is a relevant approach for the study of social inequalities.
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019856716
work_keys_str_mv AT lisbetberg classrelatedconsumptionandtheabilitytoresistcommercialtemptationsintheageofcommercialism
_version_ 1724441931218419712