The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery

Background: Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been traditionally less employed compared to other forms of regional anesthesia. The advent of peripheral nerve stimulator and ultrasonography, complications associated with neuraxial anesthesia, and improved rehabilitation with PNBs ha...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Milon Vasant Mitragotri, Pushpa Ishwarlal Agrawal, Vaishnavi V Kulkarni, Nilambree S Adke, Dharmesh Arvind Ladhad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2017-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Pain
Online Access:http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2017;volume=31;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Mitragotri
id doaj-ef24d1a0bfc243478e0da852e1f3fc58
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef24d1a0bfc243478e0da852e1f3fc582020-11-24T23:23:04ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Pain0970-53332017-01-0131314615110.4103/0970-5333.223663The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgeryMilon Vasant MitragotriPushpa Ishwarlal AgrawalVaishnavi V KulkarniNilambree S AdkeDharmesh Arvind LadhadBackground: Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been traditionally less employed compared to other forms of regional anesthesia. The advent of peripheral nerve stimulator and ultrasonography, complications associated with neuraxial anesthesia, and improved rehabilitation with PNBs has led to renewed interest in lower limb blocks. Lumbar plexus block can be given by anterior (Winnie's “3 in 1” block) and posterior (psoas compartment block) approaches. Subjects and Methods: In this randomized, observer-blinded study, we compared these techniques in two groups of patients (Group A [n = 30] and Group P [n = 30]) undergoing lower limb surgeries using nerve locator. They were supplemented with sciatic nerve block by Labat's approach. The primary objective was to compare the onset of sensory and motor blockade. Secondary objectives included the duration of sensory and motor blockade, sparing of nerves and complications if any. The onset of sensory analgesia was assessed by visual analog scale <3 and motor blockage by modified Bromage scale. For data analysis, t-test and Chi-square test were applied. Results: In Group A, onset of sensory block was 4.816 ± 0.932 min, and in Group P, 17.167 ± 2.364 min. In Group A, the onset of motor action was 7.833 ± 1.227 min, and in Group P, 22.8 ± 4.42 min. The duration of motor block was 5.6 ± 1.07 h in group A and 5.88 ± 0.90 h in Group P. The duration of sensory block was found to be 8.18 ± 1.32 h in Group A and 8.18 ± 0.88 h in Group P. Conclusion: Winnie's 3-in-1 block is associated with rapid onset of sensory and motor block but is associated with sparing of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and obturator nerve causing inadequate analgesia and tourniquet pain needing additional block or sedation compared to psoas compartment block which provides denser block.http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2017;volume=31;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Mitragotri
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Milon Vasant Mitragotri
Pushpa Ishwarlal Agrawal
Vaishnavi V Kulkarni
Nilambree S Adke
Dharmesh Arvind Ladhad
spellingShingle Milon Vasant Mitragotri
Pushpa Ishwarlal Agrawal
Vaishnavi V Kulkarni
Nilambree S Adke
Dharmesh Arvind Ladhad
The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
Indian Journal of Pain
author_facet Milon Vasant Mitragotri
Pushpa Ishwarlal Agrawal
Vaishnavi V Kulkarni
Nilambree S Adke
Dharmesh Arvind Ladhad
author_sort Milon Vasant Mitragotri
title The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
title_short The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
title_full The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
title_fullStr The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
title_full_unstemmed The comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
title_sort comparative study of two techniques of lumbar plexus block by anterior and posterior approach for lower limb surgery
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Pain
issn 0970-5333
publishDate 2017-01-01
description Background: Lower extremity peripheral nerve blocks (PNBs) have been traditionally less employed compared to other forms of regional anesthesia. The advent of peripheral nerve stimulator and ultrasonography, complications associated with neuraxial anesthesia, and improved rehabilitation with PNBs has led to renewed interest in lower limb blocks. Lumbar plexus block can be given by anterior (Winnie's “3 in 1” block) and posterior (psoas compartment block) approaches. Subjects and Methods: In this randomized, observer-blinded study, we compared these techniques in two groups of patients (Group A [n = 30] and Group P [n = 30]) undergoing lower limb surgeries using nerve locator. They were supplemented with sciatic nerve block by Labat's approach. The primary objective was to compare the onset of sensory and motor blockade. Secondary objectives included the duration of sensory and motor blockade, sparing of nerves and complications if any. The onset of sensory analgesia was assessed by visual analog scale <3 and motor blockage by modified Bromage scale. For data analysis, t-test and Chi-square test were applied. Results: In Group A, onset of sensory block was 4.816 ± 0.932 min, and in Group P, 17.167 ± 2.364 min. In Group A, the onset of motor action was 7.833 ± 1.227 min, and in Group P, 22.8 ± 4.42 min. The duration of motor block was 5.6 ± 1.07 h in group A and 5.88 ± 0.90 h in Group P. The duration of sensory block was found to be 8.18 ± 1.32 h in Group A and 8.18 ± 0.88 h in Group P. Conclusion: Winnie's 3-in-1 block is associated with rapid onset of sensory and motor block but is associated with sparing of lateral femoral cutaneous nerve and obturator nerve causing inadequate analgesia and tourniquet pain needing additional block or sedation compared to psoas compartment block which provides denser block.
url http://www.indianjpain.org/article.asp?issn=0970-5333;year=2017;volume=31;issue=3;spage=146;epage=151;aulast=Mitragotri
work_keys_str_mv AT milonvasantmitragotri thecomparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT pushpaishwarlalagrawal thecomparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT vaishnavivkulkarni thecomparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT nilambreesadke thecomparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT dharmesharvindladhad thecomparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT milonvasantmitragotri comparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT pushpaishwarlalagrawal comparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT vaishnavivkulkarni comparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT nilambreesadke comparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
AT dharmesharvindladhad comparativestudyoftwotechniquesoflumbarplexusblockbyanteriorandposteriorapproachforlowerlimbsurgery
_version_ 1725565657751224320