Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.

Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Duncan N L Menge, Jeanne L DeNoyer, Jeremy W Lichstein
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2010-08-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render
id doaj-ef1c85bfa14141ae9ebc4dbdbe44933d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef1c85bfa14141ae9ebc4dbdbe44933d2020-11-25T01:14:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-08-0158e1205610.1371/journal.pone.0012056Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.Duncan N L MengeJeanne L DeNoyerJeremy W LichsteinSymbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis.Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the 'potentially N-fixing clade' (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile.These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Duncan N L Menge
Jeanne L DeNoyer
Jeremy W Lichstein
spellingShingle Duncan N L Menge
Jeanne L DeNoyer
Jeremy W Lichstein
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Duncan N L Menge
Jeanne L DeNoyer
Jeremy W Lichstein
author_sort Duncan N L Menge
title Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
title_short Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
title_full Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
title_fullStr Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
title_full_unstemmed Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
title_sort phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2010-08-01
description Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis.Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the 'potentially N-fixing clade' (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile.These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT duncannlmenge phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests
AT jeanneldenoyer phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests
AT jeremywlichstein phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests
_version_ 1725156504472911872