Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.
Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2010-08-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ef1c85bfa14141ae9ebc4dbdbe44933d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ef1c85bfa14141ae9ebc4dbdbe44933d2020-11-25T01:14:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032010-08-0158e1205610.1371/journal.pone.0012056Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests.Duncan N L MengeJeanne L DeNoyerJeremy W LichsteinSymbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis.Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the 'potentially N-fixing clade' (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile.These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Duncan N L Menge Jeanne L DeNoyer Jeremy W Lichstein |
spellingShingle |
Duncan N L Menge Jeanne L DeNoyer Jeremy W Lichstein Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Duncan N L Menge Jeanne L DeNoyer Jeremy W Lichstein |
author_sort |
Duncan N L Menge |
title |
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
title_short |
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
title_full |
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
title_fullStr |
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
title_sort |
phylogenetic constraints do not explain the rarity of nitrogen-fixing trees in late-successional temperate forests. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2010-08-01 |
description |
Symbiotic nitrogen (N)-fixing trees are rare in late-successional temperate forests, even though these forests are often N limited. Two hypotheses could explain this paradox. The 'phylogenetic constraints hypothesis' states that no late-successional tree taxa in temperate forests belong to clades that are predisposed to N fixation. Conversely, the 'selective constraints hypothesis' states that such taxa are present, but N-fixing symbioses would lower their fitness. Here we test the phylogenetic constraints hypothesis.Using U.S. forest inventory data, we derived successional indices related to shade tolerance and stand age for N-fixing trees, non-fixing trees in the 'potentially N-fixing clade' (smallest angiosperm clade that includes all N fixers), and non-fixing trees outside this clade. We then used phylogenetically independent contrasts (PICs) to test for associations between these successional indices and N fixation. Four results stand out from our analysis of U.S. trees. First, N fixers are less shade-tolerant than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Second, N fixers tend to occur in younger stands in a given geographical region than non-fixers both inside and outside of the potentially N-fixing clade. Third, the potentially N-fixing clade contains numerous late-successional non-fixers. Fourth, although the N fixation trait is evolutionarily conserved, the successional traits are relatively labile.These results suggest that selective constraints, not phylogenetic constraints, explain the rarity of late-successional N-fixing trees in temperate forests. Because N-fixing trees could overcome N limitation to net primary production if they were abundant, this study helps to understand the maintenance of N limitation in temperate forests, and therefore the capacity of this biome to sequester carbon. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC2917374?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT duncannlmenge phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests AT jeanneldenoyer phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests AT jeremywlichstein phylogeneticconstraintsdonotexplaintherarityofnitrogenfixingtreesinlatesuccessionaltemperateforests |
_version_ |
1725156504472911872 |