What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics

Pseudo-clefts are the building blocks of coherent discourse progression and serve as a rhetorical toolkit to construct an authorial stance in the academic discourse. Despite an increasing interest in grammatical constructions in the academic discourse, researchers have not treated pseudo-clefts in m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hui Zhou, Ming Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349/full
id doaj-ef02ffbafbde4d1cb965a0d64d83f9c0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ef02ffbafbde4d1cb965a0d64d83f9c02021-05-28T10:08:11ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-05-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349672349What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied LinguisticsHui ZhouMing ChenPseudo-clefts are the building blocks of coherent discourse progression and serve as a rhetorical toolkit to construct an authorial stance in the academic discourse. Despite an increasing interest in grammatical constructions in the academic discourse, researchers have not treated pseudo-clefts in much detail. This paper explores the features of pseudo-clefts in the corpus of academic discourse in the field of applied linguistics. Here, we take the textual and the interpersonal perspectives, focusing on the use of pseudo-clefts in terms of their distribution in generic structure, discourse functions with reference to clefted constituents, and evaluative meaning. The results show that pseudo-clefts were more frequently used in “Results and Discussion” and Literature Review, performing the functions such as the specification of key terms, generalization of the literature, the description and explanation of findings, etc. They are facilitative in creating information gaps and establishing a logic-semantic expansive relationship between the clauses. The findings also suggest that the pseudo-clefts are evaluative devices and are involved in the construction of authorial identities.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349/fullpseudo-cleftsacademic discourse of applied linguisticsgeneric distributiondiscourse functionsevaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Hui Zhou
Ming Chen
spellingShingle Hui Zhou
Ming Chen
What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
Frontiers in Psychology
pseudo-clefts
academic discourse of applied linguistics
generic distribution
discourse functions
evaluation
author_facet Hui Zhou
Ming Chen
author_sort Hui Zhou
title What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
title_short What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
title_full What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
title_fullStr What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
title_full_unstemmed What Still Needs to be Noted: Pseudo-Clefts in the Academic Discourse of Applied Linguistics
title_sort what still needs to be noted: pseudo-clefts in the academic discourse of applied linguistics
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-05-01
description Pseudo-clefts are the building blocks of coherent discourse progression and serve as a rhetorical toolkit to construct an authorial stance in the academic discourse. Despite an increasing interest in grammatical constructions in the academic discourse, researchers have not treated pseudo-clefts in much detail. This paper explores the features of pseudo-clefts in the corpus of academic discourse in the field of applied linguistics. Here, we take the textual and the interpersonal perspectives, focusing on the use of pseudo-clefts in terms of their distribution in generic structure, discourse functions with reference to clefted constituents, and evaluative meaning. The results show that pseudo-clefts were more frequently used in “Results and Discussion” and Literature Review, performing the functions such as the specification of key terms, generalization of the literature, the description and explanation of findings, etc. They are facilitative in creating information gaps and establishing a logic-semantic expansive relationship between the clauses. The findings also suggest that the pseudo-clefts are evaluative devices and are involved in the construction of authorial identities.
topic pseudo-clefts
academic discourse of applied linguistics
generic distribution
discourse functions
evaluation
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.672349/full
work_keys_str_mv AT huizhou whatstillneedstobenotedpseudocleftsintheacademicdiscourseofappliedlinguistics
AT mingchen whatstillneedstobenotedpseudocleftsintheacademicdiscourseofappliedlinguistics
_version_ 1721424279123263488