PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL

The article presents the scholar analysis of the party systems of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The author emphasizes that the party systems of the above-mentioned states are based on national level on a two-party system of Anglo-Saxon type. The author believes that the Canadian, Briti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: A N Komarov
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University) 2017-12-01
Series:RUDN Journal of World History
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/viewFile/15826/14380
id doaj-eefd8f90e28e4366b7e6f82b4b071418
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eefd8f90e28e4366b7e6f82b4b0714182021-05-25T18:01:09ZengPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)RUDN Journal of World History2312-81272312-833X2017-12-0191274210.22363/2312-8127-2017-9-1-27-4215004PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIALA N Komarov0Russian State University of HumanitiesThe article presents the scholar analysis of the party systems of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The author emphasizes that the party systems of the above-mentioned states are based on national level on a two-party system of Anglo-Saxon type. The author believes that the Canadian, British, Australian and New Zealand Conservatives, Liberals and Social Democrats consider the progressive development of society in the framework of the established two-party system that forms the institutional, electoral and political base for their ideologies, primarily conservatism, liberalism and social-democracy. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the number of aforementioned points in two-party systems of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, there are significant differences that are explained by historical and economic peculiarities of development of Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand. A crucial difference is the lack of an institutionalized Conservative party in the party systems of Australia and New Zealand.http://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/viewFile/15826/14380party systemconservatismliberalismsocial-democracythe highly developed countries of the worldthe anglo-saxon political traditionsnational levelgenesis
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A N Komarov
spellingShingle A N Komarov
PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
RUDN Journal of World History
party system
conservatism
liberalism
social-democracy
the highly developed countries of the world
the anglo-saxon political traditions
national level
genesis
author_facet A N Komarov
author_sort A N Komarov
title PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
title_short PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
title_full PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
title_fullStr PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
title_full_unstemmed PARTY SYSTEMS IN BRITAIN, CANADA, AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND: GENERAL AND SPECIAL
title_sort party systems in britain, canada, australia and new zealand: general and special
publisher Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
series RUDN Journal of World History
issn 2312-8127
2312-833X
publishDate 2017-12-01
description The article presents the scholar analysis of the party systems of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. The author emphasizes that the party systems of the above-mentioned states are based on national level on a two-party system of Anglo-Saxon type. The author believes that the Canadian, British, Australian and New Zealand Conservatives, Liberals and Social Democrats consider the progressive development of society in the framework of the established two-party system that forms the institutional, electoral and political base for their ideologies, primarily conservatism, liberalism and social-democracy. The author comes to the conclusion that, despite the number of aforementioned points in two-party systems of Britain, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, there are significant differences that are explained by historical and economic peculiarities of development of Canada, UK, Australia and New Zealand. A crucial difference is the lack of an institutionalized Conservative party in the party systems of Australia and New Zealand.
topic party system
conservatism
liberalism
social-democracy
the highly developed countries of the world
the anglo-saxon political traditions
national level
genesis
url http://journals.rudn.ru/world-history/article/viewFile/15826/14380
work_keys_str_mv AT ankomarov partysystemsinbritaincanadaaustraliaandnewzealandgeneralandspecial
_version_ 1721427009922400256