No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>So-called atypical scrapie was first identified in Great Britain (GB) in 2002 following the introduction of wide-scale scrapie surveillance. In particular, abattoir and fallen stock surveys have been carried out in GB since 2002, wit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: del Rio Vilas Victor J, McIntyre K Marie, Gubbins Simon
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-04-01
Series:BMC Veterinary Research
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/4/13
id doaj-eeeb49b018e241fcbad426c6e7613218
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eeeb49b018e241fcbad426c6e76132182020-11-24T21:17:42ZengBMCBMC Veterinary Research1746-61482008-04-01411310.1186/1746-6148-4-13No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006del Rio Vilas Victor JMcIntyre K MarieGubbins Simon<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>So-called atypical scrapie was first identified in Great Britain (GB) in 2002 following the introduction of wide-scale scrapie surveillance. In particular, abattoir and fallen stock surveys have been carried out in GB since 2002, with a total of 147 atypical positives identified by the end of 2006. The results of these surveys provide data with which to assess temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in sheep in Great Britain between 2002 and 2006.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the results of abattoir and fallen stock surveys, the prevalence of atypical scrapie (percentage of samples positive) was estimated. The prevalence in the abattoir and fallen stock surveys, for all years combined, was 0.09% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08%–0.11%) and 0.07% (95% CI: 0.05%–0.11%), respectively. There were no significant temporal trends in either survey. Comparing the surveys' results, there were no significant differences in annual prevalence or the prevalence within <it>PrP </it>genotypes. For the abattoir survey, the <it>PrP </it>genotype with the highest prevalence was AHQ/AHQ, which was significantly higher than all other genotypes, except ARR/AHQ, AHQ/ARH and ARH/ARQ.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The estimated prevalence of atypical scrapie was similar in both the abattoir and fallen stock surveys. Our results indicate there was no significant temporal trend in prevalence, adding to evidence that this atypical form of scrapie may be a sporadic condition or, if it is infectious, that the force of infection is very low.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/4/13
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author del Rio Vilas Victor J
McIntyre K Marie
Gubbins Simon
spellingShingle del Rio Vilas Victor J
McIntyre K Marie
Gubbins Simon
No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
BMC Veterinary Research
author_facet del Rio Vilas Victor J
McIntyre K Marie
Gubbins Simon
author_sort del Rio Vilas Victor J
title No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
title_short No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
title_full No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
title_fullStr No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
title_full_unstemmed No temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in British sheep, 2002–2006
title_sort no temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in british sheep, 2002–2006
publisher BMC
series BMC Veterinary Research
issn 1746-6148
publishDate 2008-04-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>So-called atypical scrapie was first identified in Great Britain (GB) in 2002 following the introduction of wide-scale scrapie surveillance. In particular, abattoir and fallen stock surveys have been carried out in GB since 2002, with a total of 147 atypical positives identified by the end of 2006. The results of these surveys provide data with which to assess temporal trends in the prevalence of atypical scrapie in sheep in Great Britain between 2002 and 2006.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Using the results of abattoir and fallen stock surveys, the prevalence of atypical scrapie (percentage of samples positive) was estimated. The prevalence in the abattoir and fallen stock surveys, for all years combined, was 0.09% (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.08%–0.11%) and 0.07% (95% CI: 0.05%–0.11%), respectively. There were no significant temporal trends in either survey. Comparing the surveys' results, there were no significant differences in annual prevalence or the prevalence within <it>PrP </it>genotypes. For the abattoir survey, the <it>PrP </it>genotype with the highest prevalence was AHQ/AHQ, which was significantly higher than all other genotypes, except ARR/AHQ, AHQ/ARH and ARH/ARQ.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>The estimated prevalence of atypical scrapie was similar in both the abattoir and fallen stock surveys. Our results indicate there was no significant temporal trend in prevalence, adding to evidence that this atypical form of scrapie may be a sporadic condition or, if it is infectious, that the force of infection is very low.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1746-6148/4/13
work_keys_str_mv AT delriovilasvictorj notemporaltrendsintheprevalenceofatypicalscrapieinbritishsheep20022006
AT mcintyrekmarie notemporaltrendsintheprevalenceofatypicalscrapieinbritishsheep20022006
AT gubbinssimon notemporaltrendsintheprevalenceofatypicalscrapieinbritishsheep20022006
_version_ 1726012563417726976