Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations

Summary Although mechanisms involved in response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic challenge are well described for low and sudden stresses, little is known about how cells respond to a gradual increase of the osmotic pressure (reduced water activity; aw) over several generations as it could en...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stéphane Guyot, Laurence Pottier, Lucie Bertheau, Jennifer Dumont, Eminence Dorelle Hondjuila Miokono, Sébastien Dupont, Mélanie Ragon, Emmanuel Denimal, Ambroise Marin, John E. Hallsworth, Laurent Beney, Patrick Gervais
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-07-01
Series:Microbial Biotechnology
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13789
id doaj-eeeb180a73b4414a85f83e20105ba7f6
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eeeb180a73b4414a85f83e20105ba7f62021-07-26T21:47:23ZengWileyMicrobial Biotechnology1751-79152021-07-011441445146110.1111/1751-7915.13789Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generationsStéphane Guyot0Laurence Pottier1Lucie Bertheau2Jennifer Dumont3Eminence Dorelle Hondjuila Miokono4Sébastien Dupont5Mélanie Ragon6Emmanuel Denimal7Ambroise Marin8John E. Hallsworth9Laurent Beney10Patrick Gervais11Univ. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceDirection des Systèmes d’Information AgroSup Dijon, 26 Boulevard Docteur Petitjean Dijon21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceInstitute for Global Food Security School of Biological Sciences Queen's University Belfast 19 Chlorine Gardens BelfastBT9 5DLUKUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceUniv. Bourgogne Franche‐ComtéAgroSup Dijon, PAM UMR A 02.102 DijonF‐21000FranceSummary Although mechanisms involved in response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic challenge are well described for low and sudden stresses, little is known about how cells respond to a gradual increase of the osmotic pressure (reduced water activity; aw) over several generations as it could encounter during drying in nature or in food processes. Using glycerol as a stressor, we propagated S. cerevisiae through a ramp of the osmotic pressure (up to high molar concentrations to achieve testing‐to‐destruction) at the rate of 1.5 MPa day‐1 from 1.38 to 58.5 MPa (0.990–0.635 aw). Cultivability (measured at 1.38 MPa and at the harvest osmotic pressure) and glucose consumption compared with the corresponding sudden stress showed that yeasts were able to grow until about 10.5 MPa (0.926 aw) and to survive until about 58.5 MPa, whereas glucose consumption occurred until 13.5 MPa (about 0.915 aw). Nevertheless, the ramp conferred an advantage since yeasts harvested at 10.5 and 34.5 MPa (0.778 aw) showed a greater cultivability than glycerol‐shocked cells after a subsequent shock at 200 MPa (0.234 aw) for 2 days. FTIR analysis revealed structural changes in wall and proteins in the range 1.38–10.5 MPa, which would be likely to be involved in the resistance at extreme osmotic pressure.https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13789
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stéphane Guyot
Laurence Pottier
Lucie Bertheau
Jennifer Dumont
Eminence Dorelle Hondjuila Miokono
Sébastien Dupont
Mélanie Ragon
Emmanuel Denimal
Ambroise Marin
John E. Hallsworth
Laurent Beney
Patrick Gervais
spellingShingle Stéphane Guyot
Laurence Pottier
Lucie Bertheau
Jennifer Dumont
Eminence Dorelle Hondjuila Miokono
Sébastien Dupont
Mélanie Ragon
Emmanuel Denimal
Ambroise Marin
John E. Hallsworth
Laurent Beney
Patrick Gervais
Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
Microbial Biotechnology
author_facet Stéphane Guyot
Laurence Pottier
Lucie Bertheau
Jennifer Dumont
Eminence Dorelle Hondjuila Miokono
Sébastien Dupont
Mélanie Ragon
Emmanuel Denimal
Ambroise Marin
John E. Hallsworth
Laurent Beney
Patrick Gervais
author_sort Stéphane Guyot
title Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
title_short Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
title_full Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
title_fullStr Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
title_full_unstemmed Increased xerotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
title_sort increased xerotolerance of saccharomyces cerevisiae during an osmotic pressure ramp over several generations
publisher Wiley
series Microbial Biotechnology
issn 1751-7915
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Summary Although mechanisms involved in response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic challenge are well described for low and sudden stresses, little is known about how cells respond to a gradual increase of the osmotic pressure (reduced water activity; aw) over several generations as it could encounter during drying in nature or in food processes. Using glycerol as a stressor, we propagated S. cerevisiae through a ramp of the osmotic pressure (up to high molar concentrations to achieve testing‐to‐destruction) at the rate of 1.5 MPa day‐1 from 1.38 to 58.5 MPa (0.990–0.635 aw). Cultivability (measured at 1.38 MPa and at the harvest osmotic pressure) and glucose consumption compared with the corresponding sudden stress showed that yeasts were able to grow until about 10.5 MPa (0.926 aw) and to survive until about 58.5 MPa, whereas glucose consumption occurred until 13.5 MPa (about 0.915 aw). Nevertheless, the ramp conferred an advantage since yeasts harvested at 10.5 and 34.5 MPa (0.778 aw) showed a greater cultivability than glycerol‐shocked cells after a subsequent shock at 200 MPa (0.234 aw) for 2 days. FTIR analysis revealed structural changes in wall and proteins in the range 1.38–10.5 MPa, which would be likely to be involved in the resistance at extreme osmotic pressure.
url https://doi.org/10.1111/1751-7915.13789
work_keys_str_mv AT stephaneguyot increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT laurencepottier increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT luciebertheau increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT jenniferdumont increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT eminencedorellehondjuilamiokono increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT sebastiendupont increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT melanieragon increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT emmanueldenimal increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT ambroisemarin increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT johnehallsworth increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT laurentbeney increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
AT patrickgervais increasedxerotoleranceofsaccharomycescerevisiaeduringanosmoticpressurerampoverseveralgenerations
_version_ 1721280703065227264