ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design

ABSTRACT: Study design: Biomechanical study in cadaveric specimens. Background: The commercially available lumbar disc prostheses do not reproduce the intact disc's Instantaneous centre of Rotation (ICR), thus inducing an overload on adjacent anatomical structures, promoting secondary degenera...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz, Carlos M. Atienza, Vicente Vanaclocha, Vicente Belloch, Juan Manuel Santabarbara, Pablo Jordá-Gómez, Leyre Vanaclocha
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-08-01
Series:North American Spine Society Journal
Subjects:
ICR
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548420300160
id doaj-eed1e388ad154241ae1e113ccc0ea3dc
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eed1e388ad154241ae1e113ccc0ea3dc2021-06-08T04:43:54ZengElsevierNorth American Spine Society Journal2666-54842020-08-012100016ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis designAmparo Vanaclocha-Saiz0Carlos M. Atienza1Vicente Vanaclocha2Vicente Belloch3Juan Manuel Santabarbara4Pablo Jordá-Gómez5Leyre Vanaclocha6Escuela de Doctorado, Valencia, Spain; Corresponding author.Instituto de Biomecánica (IBV) Universitat Politècnica de Valencia, Valencia, Spain; Instituto de Biomecánica de Valencia-CIBER BBN, Grupo de Tecnología Sanitaria (GTS-IBV), Valencia, SpainUniversity of Valencia, Valencia, SpainASCIRES CAMPANAR, Valencia, SpainASCIRES CAMPANAR, Valencia, SpainHospital Politècnic i Universitari La Fe, Valencia, SpainUniversity College London, London United KingdonABSTRACT: Study design: Biomechanical study in cadaveric specimens. Background: The commercially available lumbar disc prostheses do not reproduce the intact disc's Instantaneous centre of Rotation (ICR), thus inducing an overload on adjacent anatomical structures, promoting secondary degeneration. Aim: To examine biomechanical testing of cadaveric lumbar spine specimens in order to evaluate and define the ICR of intact lumbar discs. Material and Methods: Twelve cold preserved fresh human cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were subjected to computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomechanical testing. Kinematic studies were performed to analyse range of movements in order to determine ICR. Results: Flexoextension and lateral bending tests showed a positive linear correlation between the angle rotated and the displacement of the ICR in different axes. Discussion: ICR has not been taken into account in any of the available literature regarding lumbar disc prosthesis. Considering our results, neither the actual ball-and-socket nor the withdrawn elastomeric nucleus models fit the biomechanics of the lumbar spine, which could at least in part explain the failure rates of the implants in terms of postoperative failed back syndrome (low back pain). It is reasonable to consider then that an implant should also adapt the equations of the movement of the intact ICR of the joint to the post-surgical ICR. Conclusions: This is the first cadaveric study on the ICR of the human lumbar spine. We have shown that it is feasible to calculate and consider this parameter in order to design future prosthesis with improved clinical and biomechanical characteristics.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548420300160Lumbar disc prosthesisChronic low back painICRDisc degeneration
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz
Carlos M. Atienza
Vicente Vanaclocha
Vicente Belloch
Juan Manuel Santabarbara
Pablo Jordá-Gómez
Leyre Vanaclocha
spellingShingle Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz
Carlos M. Atienza
Vicente Vanaclocha
Vicente Belloch
Juan Manuel Santabarbara
Pablo Jordá-Gómez
Leyre Vanaclocha
ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
North American Spine Society Journal
Lumbar disc prosthesis
Chronic low back pain
ICR
Disc degeneration
author_facet Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz
Carlos M. Atienza
Vicente Vanaclocha
Vicente Belloch
Juan Manuel Santabarbara
Pablo Jordá-Gómez
Leyre Vanaclocha
author_sort Amparo Vanaclocha-Saiz
title ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
title_short ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
title_full ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
title_fullStr ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
title_full_unstemmed ICR in human cadaveric specimens: An essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
title_sort icr in human cadaveric specimens: an essential parameter to consider in a new lumbar disc prosthesis design
publisher Elsevier
series North American Spine Society Journal
issn 2666-5484
publishDate 2020-08-01
description ABSTRACT: Study design: Biomechanical study in cadaveric specimens. Background: The commercially available lumbar disc prostheses do not reproduce the intact disc's Instantaneous centre of Rotation (ICR), thus inducing an overload on adjacent anatomical structures, promoting secondary degeneration. Aim: To examine biomechanical testing of cadaveric lumbar spine specimens in order to evaluate and define the ICR of intact lumbar discs. Material and Methods: Twelve cold preserved fresh human cadaveric lumbosacral spine specimens were subjected to computerized tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and biomechanical testing. Kinematic studies were performed to analyse range of movements in order to determine ICR. Results: Flexoextension and lateral bending tests showed a positive linear correlation between the angle rotated and the displacement of the ICR in different axes. Discussion: ICR has not been taken into account in any of the available literature regarding lumbar disc prosthesis. Considering our results, neither the actual ball-and-socket nor the withdrawn elastomeric nucleus models fit the biomechanics of the lumbar spine, which could at least in part explain the failure rates of the implants in terms of postoperative failed back syndrome (low back pain). It is reasonable to consider then that an implant should also adapt the equations of the movement of the intact ICR of the joint to the post-surgical ICR. Conclusions: This is the first cadaveric study on the ICR of the human lumbar spine. We have shown that it is feasible to calculate and consider this parameter in order to design future prosthesis with improved clinical and biomechanical characteristics.
topic Lumbar disc prosthesis
Chronic low back pain
ICR
Disc degeneration
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666548420300160
work_keys_str_mv AT amparovanaclochasaiz icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT carlosmatienza icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT vicentevanaclocha icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT vicentebelloch icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT juanmanuelsantabarbara icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT pablojordagomez icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
AT leyrevanaclocha icrinhumancadavericspecimensanessentialparametertoconsiderinanewlumbardiscprosthesisdesign
_version_ 1721390218154606592