Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform

This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on European economic and social models. It provides a comparative assessment of fiscal and regulatory policies in 17 industrialised countries (the EU15, US and Japan) and presents the records of these countries in attaining key economic and social objecti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martin Heipertz, Melanie Ward-Warmedinger
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institute of Public Finance 2008-09-01
Series:Financial Theory and Practice
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijf.hr/eng/FTP/2008/3/heipertz.pdf
id doaj-eecc69e1602c4a5d900a4f7173475601
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eecc69e1602c4a5d900a4f71734756012020-11-24T21:31:58ZengInstitute of Public FinanceFinancial Theory and Practice1846-887X1845-97572008-09-01323255287Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of ReformMartin HeipertzMelanie Ward-WarmedingerThis paper contributes to the ongoing debate on European economic and social models. It provides a comparative assessment of fiscal and regulatory policies in 17 industrialised countries (the EU15, US and Japan) and presents the records of these countries in attaining key economic and social objectives. Social and economic systems that feature efficient public sectors and flexible market structures tend to experience reasonably sustainable public finances, high economic growth, education standards and employment, and well-functioning markets. Anglo-Saxon countries broadly fit this mould, albeit, seemingly, at some cost of income equality. A more pronounced emphasis on welfare state policies and the corresponding relatively high levels of public spending bring benefit to income distribution in the Nordic countries while the resulting inefficiencies in their economies are counterbalanced by flexibility in labour and particularly product markets. Also, a number of reform-minded European countries have improved their fiscal and regulatory policies while significantly enhancing the functioning of markets, fiscal sustainability and economic performance. This was generally attained without jeopardising social objectives. On the other hand, those continental and Mediterranean countries that maintain market inefficiencies and at the same time sustain expensive and inefficient welfare states generally suffer from low growth and employment and less well-functioning markets and face serious risks to their economies’ fiscal sustainability. The findings of this note support calls for the comprehensive reform of fiscal policies, as well as of product and labour markets.http://www.ijf.hr/eng/FTP/2008/3/heipertz.pdffiscal policyregulationNordic modelwelfare stateefficiencyreform
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martin Heipertz
Melanie Ward-Warmedinger
spellingShingle Martin Heipertz
Melanie Ward-Warmedinger
Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
Financial Theory and Practice
fiscal policy
regulation
Nordic model
welfare state
efficiency
reform
author_facet Martin Heipertz
Melanie Ward-Warmedinger
author_sort Martin Heipertz
title Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
title_short Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
title_full Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
title_fullStr Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
title_full_unstemmed Economic and Social Models in Europe and the Importance of Reform
title_sort economic and social models in europe and the importance of reform
publisher Institute of Public Finance
series Financial Theory and Practice
issn 1846-887X
1845-9757
publishDate 2008-09-01
description This paper contributes to the ongoing debate on European economic and social models. It provides a comparative assessment of fiscal and regulatory policies in 17 industrialised countries (the EU15, US and Japan) and presents the records of these countries in attaining key economic and social objectives. Social and economic systems that feature efficient public sectors and flexible market structures tend to experience reasonably sustainable public finances, high economic growth, education standards and employment, and well-functioning markets. Anglo-Saxon countries broadly fit this mould, albeit, seemingly, at some cost of income equality. A more pronounced emphasis on welfare state policies and the corresponding relatively high levels of public spending bring benefit to income distribution in the Nordic countries while the resulting inefficiencies in their economies are counterbalanced by flexibility in labour and particularly product markets. Also, a number of reform-minded European countries have improved their fiscal and regulatory policies while significantly enhancing the functioning of markets, fiscal sustainability and economic performance. This was generally attained without jeopardising social objectives. On the other hand, those continental and Mediterranean countries that maintain market inefficiencies and at the same time sustain expensive and inefficient welfare states generally suffer from low growth and employment and less well-functioning markets and face serious risks to their economies’ fiscal sustainability. The findings of this note support calls for the comprehensive reform of fiscal policies, as well as of product and labour markets.
topic fiscal policy
regulation
Nordic model
welfare state
efficiency
reform
url http://www.ijf.hr/eng/FTP/2008/3/heipertz.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT martinheipertz economicandsocialmodelsineuropeandtheimportanceofreform
AT melaniewardwarmedinger economicandsocialmodelsineuropeandtheimportanceofreform
_version_ 1725959180536250368