A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals

Background: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Qutaiba A. Tawfic, Alexander Freytag, Kevin Armstrong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2021-03-01
Series:Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117
id doaj-eecb8c80643b410a89bc08ceb53e46ba
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eecb8c80643b410a89bc08ceb53e46ba2021-04-24T05:55:54ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142021-03-01712116122A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitalsQutaiba A. Tawfic0Alexander Freytag1Kevin Armstrong2Western University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London, Canada; Corresponding author.Western University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, London, CanadaWestern University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Complex Pain Management Program, London, CanadaBackground: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question survey from lead personnel of the APS teams or Anesthesia departments of Canadian teaching hospitals. Results: Among the 32 centers that were contacted, 21 (65.6%) responded. Of these respondents, 18 (85.7%) indicated that they have a structured APS (72.22% adults, 5.56% pediatrics, 22.22% mixed). Among the 18 centers with an APS, 16 of the services are led by an anesthesiologist. Eight centers (44.44%) have a regional anesthesia group, of which five (27.75%) have a regional anesthesia group that is distinct from the APS team. Nine centers (50%) offer ambulatory nerve catheter analgesia after discharge home. Fifteen centers (83.33%) use standardized order sets, and 13 centers (72.22%) use an electronic record for APS. More than 50% of the centers use intravenous lidocaine and ketamine as a part of their multimodal analgesia. Conclusion: Most Canadian teaching hospitals do have a functioning APS. This survey has the potential to generate research questions about the availability of standardized and advanced acute pain management in Canada’s teaching hospitals.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117Surveys and questionnairesAcute pain
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Qutaiba A. Tawfic
Alexander Freytag
Kevin Armstrong
spellingShingle Qutaiba A. Tawfic
Alexander Freytag
Kevin Armstrong
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
Surveys and questionnaires
Acute pain
author_facet Qutaiba A. Tawfic
Alexander Freytag
Kevin Armstrong
author_sort Qutaiba A. Tawfic
title A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
title_short A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
title_full A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
title_fullStr A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
title_full_unstemmed A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
title_sort survey of acute pain service in canadian teaching hospitals
publisher Elsevier
series Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology
issn 0104-0014
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Background: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question survey from lead personnel of the APS teams or Anesthesia departments of Canadian teaching hospitals. Results: Among the 32 centers that were contacted, 21 (65.6%) responded. Of these respondents, 18 (85.7%) indicated that they have a structured APS (72.22% adults, 5.56% pediatrics, 22.22% mixed). Among the 18 centers with an APS, 16 of the services are led by an anesthesiologist. Eight centers (44.44%) have a regional anesthesia group, of which five (27.75%) have a regional anesthesia group that is distinct from the APS team. Nine centers (50%) offer ambulatory nerve catheter analgesia after discharge home. Fifteen centers (83.33%) use standardized order sets, and 13 centers (72.22%) use an electronic record for APS. More than 50% of the centers use intravenous lidocaine and ketamine as a part of their multimodal analgesia. Conclusion: Most Canadian teaching hospitals do have a functioning APS. This survey has the potential to generate research questions about the availability of standardized and advanced acute pain management in Canada’s teaching hospitals.
topic Surveys and questionnaires
Acute pain
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117
work_keys_str_mv AT qutaibaatawfic asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
AT alexanderfreytag asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
AT kevinarmstrong asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
AT qutaibaatawfic surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
AT alexanderfreytag surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
AT kevinarmstrong surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals
_version_ 1721511279352348672