A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals
Background: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Elsevier
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117 |
id |
doaj-eecb8c80643b410a89bc08ceb53e46ba |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-eecb8c80643b410a89bc08ceb53e46ba2021-04-24T05:55:54ZengElsevierBrazilian Journal of Anesthesiology0104-00142021-03-01712116122A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitalsQutaiba A. Tawfic0Alexander Freytag1Kevin Armstrong2Western University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, London, Canada; Corresponding author.Western University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, London, CanadaWestern University, London Health Science Centre, University Hospital, Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Complex Pain Management Program, London, CanadaBackground: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question survey from lead personnel of the APS teams or Anesthesia departments of Canadian teaching hospitals. Results: Among the 32 centers that were contacted, 21 (65.6%) responded. Of these respondents, 18 (85.7%) indicated that they have a structured APS (72.22% adults, 5.56% pediatrics, 22.22% mixed). Among the 18 centers with an APS, 16 of the services are led by an anesthesiologist. Eight centers (44.44%) have a regional anesthesia group, of which five (27.75%) have a regional anesthesia group that is distinct from the APS team. Nine centers (50%) offer ambulatory nerve catheter analgesia after discharge home. Fifteen centers (83.33%) use standardized order sets, and 13 centers (72.22%) use an electronic record for APS. More than 50% of the centers use intravenous lidocaine and ketamine as a part of their multimodal analgesia. Conclusion: Most Canadian teaching hospitals do have a functioning APS. This survey has the potential to generate research questions about the availability of standardized and advanced acute pain management in Canada’s teaching hospitals.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117Surveys and questionnairesAcute pain |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Qutaiba A. Tawfic Alexander Freytag Kevin Armstrong |
spellingShingle |
Qutaiba A. Tawfic Alexander Freytag Kevin Armstrong A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology Surveys and questionnaires Acute pain |
author_facet |
Qutaiba A. Tawfic Alexander Freytag Kevin Armstrong |
author_sort |
Qutaiba A. Tawfic |
title |
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals |
title_short |
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals |
title_full |
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals |
title_fullStr |
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals |
title_full_unstemmed |
A survey of acute pain service in Canadian teaching hospitals |
title_sort |
survey of acute pain service in canadian teaching hospitals |
publisher |
Elsevier |
series |
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology |
issn |
0104-0014 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Background: The first national survey to ascertain the prevalence, structure, and functioning of the APS in Canadian university affiliated hospitals was conducted in 1991. This is a follow-up survey to assess the current status of the APS in Canada. Methods: We requested completion of a 26-question survey from lead personnel of the APS teams or Anesthesia departments of Canadian teaching hospitals. Results: Among the 32 centers that were contacted, 21 (65.6%) responded. Of these respondents, 18 (85.7%) indicated that they have a structured APS (72.22% adults, 5.56% pediatrics, 22.22% mixed). Among the 18 centers with an APS, 16 of the services are led by an anesthesiologist. Eight centers (44.44%) have a regional anesthesia group, of which five (27.75%) have a regional anesthesia group that is distinct from the APS team. Nine centers (50%) offer ambulatory nerve catheter analgesia after discharge home. Fifteen centers (83.33%) use standardized order sets, and 13 centers (72.22%) use an electronic record for APS. More than 50% of the centers use intravenous lidocaine and ketamine as a part of their multimodal analgesia. Conclusion: Most Canadian teaching hospitals do have a functioning APS. This survey has the potential to generate research questions about the availability of standardized and advanced acute pain management in Canada’s teaching hospitals. |
topic |
Surveys and questionnaires Acute pain |
url |
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001421000117 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT qutaibaatawfic asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals AT alexanderfreytag asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals AT kevinarmstrong asurveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals AT qutaibaatawfic surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals AT alexanderfreytag surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals AT kevinarmstrong surveyofacutepainserviceincanadianteachinghospitals |
_version_ |
1721511279352348672 |