The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities

Cities are increasingly seen as the places where innovations that can trigger a sociotechnical transition toward urban mobility are emerging and maturing. Processes such as peak car, rail renaissance and cycling boom manifest themselves particularly in cities, and success stories of cities experimen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tim Schwanen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2015-06-01
Series:Sustainability
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7086
id doaj-eeb75519ddca4945ada6e1f5c781a6ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-eeb75519ddca4945ada6e1f5c781a6ee2020-11-24T23:02:29ZengMDPI AGSustainability2071-10502015-06-01767086711110.3390/su7067086su7067086The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK CitiesTim Schwanen0Transport Studies Unit, School of Geography and the Environment, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QY, UKCities are increasingly seen as the places where innovations that can trigger a sociotechnical transition toward urban mobility are emerging and maturing. Processes such as peak car, rail renaissance and cycling boom manifest themselves particularly in cities, and success stories of cities experimenting with specific types of low-energy mobility abound in the academic literature. Nonetheless, innovation is known to be a precarious process requiring favorable circumstances. Using document analysis and in-depth interviews, this study examines the nature of low-energy innovation in the everyday mobility of people in two UK cities with favorable conditions for a transition away from fossil fuels—Brighton and Oxford. It shows that clear differences exist between the two cities in the sorts of innovation that emerge and diffuse as a result of path dependencies, local politics, and financial support from supra-local governments and agencies. While low-energy mobility currently has substantial momentum in both cities, the majority of low-carbon innovations in urban mobility are incremental rather than radical in nature, and their future is often imbued with uncertainty. The autonomy of small- and medium-sized cities as agents in bringing about transformational change toward low-energy urban mobility should not be overestimated.http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7086low-energy transportcarbonenergy consumptionsociotechnical transitioninnovationcitiesUnited Kingdom
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Tim Schwanen
spellingShingle Tim Schwanen
The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
Sustainability
low-energy transport
carbon
energy consumption
sociotechnical transition
innovation
cities
United Kingdom
author_facet Tim Schwanen
author_sort Tim Schwanen
title The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
title_short The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
title_full The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
title_fullStr The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
title_full_unstemmed The Bumpy Road toward Low-Energy Urban Mobility: Case Studies from Two UK Cities
title_sort bumpy road toward low-energy urban mobility: case studies from two uk cities
publisher MDPI AG
series Sustainability
issn 2071-1050
publishDate 2015-06-01
description Cities are increasingly seen as the places where innovations that can trigger a sociotechnical transition toward urban mobility are emerging and maturing. Processes such as peak car, rail renaissance and cycling boom manifest themselves particularly in cities, and success stories of cities experimenting with specific types of low-energy mobility abound in the academic literature. Nonetheless, innovation is known to be a precarious process requiring favorable circumstances. Using document analysis and in-depth interviews, this study examines the nature of low-energy innovation in the everyday mobility of people in two UK cities with favorable conditions for a transition away from fossil fuels—Brighton and Oxford. It shows that clear differences exist between the two cities in the sorts of innovation that emerge and diffuse as a result of path dependencies, local politics, and financial support from supra-local governments and agencies. While low-energy mobility currently has substantial momentum in both cities, the majority of low-carbon innovations in urban mobility are incremental rather than radical in nature, and their future is often imbued with uncertainty. The autonomy of small- and medium-sized cities as agents in bringing about transformational change toward low-energy urban mobility should not be overestimated.
topic low-energy transport
carbon
energy consumption
sociotechnical transition
innovation
cities
United Kingdom
url http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/7/6/7086
work_keys_str_mv AT timschwanen thebumpyroadtowardlowenergyurbanmobilitycasestudiesfromtwoukcities
AT timschwanen bumpyroadtowardlowenergyurbanmobilitycasestudiesfromtwoukcities
_version_ 1725636539665350656