Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care

Abstract Background There is international interest in whether improved primary care, in particular for patients with chronic or complex conditions, can lead to decreased use of health resources and whether financial incentives help achieve this goal. This trial (EQuIP-GP) will investigate whether a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gregory M. Peterson, Grant Russell, Jan C. Radford, Nick Zwar, Danielle Mazza, Simon Eckermann, Judy Mullan, Marijka J. Batterham, Athena Hammond, Andrew Bonney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-07-01
Series:BMC Health Services Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4336-2
id doaj-ee93fb5a65aa41e58e3b2a68887ed007
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee93fb5a65aa41e58e3b2a68887ed0072020-11-25T02:54:20ZengBMCBMC Health Services Research1472-69632019-07-0119111410.1186/s12913-019-4336-2Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient careGregory M. Peterson0Grant Russell1Jan C. Radford2Nick Zwar3Danielle Mazza4Simon Eckermann5Judy Mullan6Marijka J. Batterham7Athena Hammond8Andrew Bonney9School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart and LauncestonDepartment of General Practice, Monash UniversitySchool of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Hobart and LauncestonFaculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond UniversityDepartment of General Practice, Monash UniversityAustralian Health Services Research Institute, University of WollongongSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteStatistical Consulting Centre, School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong; National Institute for Applied Statistics Research Australia, University of Wollongong; and Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteSchool of Medicine, University of WollongongSchool of Medicine, University of Wollongong and Illawarra Health and Medical Research InstituteAbstract Background There is international interest in whether improved primary care, in particular for patients with chronic or complex conditions, can lead to decreased use of health resources and whether financial incentives help achieve this goal. This trial (EQuIP-GP) will investigate whether a funding model based upon targeted, continuous quality incentive payments for Australian general practices increases relational continuity of care, and lessens health-service utilisation, for high-risk patients and children. Methods We will use a mixed methods approach incorporating a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomised control trial with nested qualitative case studies. We aim to recruit 36 general practices from Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRN) covering urban and regional areas of Australia, randomised into intervention and control groups. Control practices will provide usual care while intervention practices will be supported to implement a new service model incorporating incentives for relational continuity and timely access to appointments. Patients will comprise three groups: older (over 65 years); 18–65 years with chronic and/or complex conditions; and those aged less than 16 years with increased risk of hospitalisation. The funding model includes financial incentives to general practitioners (GPs) for providing longer consultations, same day access and timely follow-up after hospitalisation to enrolled patients. The payments are proportional to expected health system savings associated with improved quality of GP care. An outreach facilitator will work with practices to help incorporate the incentive model into usual work. The main outcome measure is relational continuity of care (Primary Care Assessment Tool short-form survey), with secondary outcomes including health-related quality of life and health service use (hospitalisations, emergency presentations, GP and specialist services in the community, medicine prescriptions and targeted pathology and imaging ordering). Outcomes will be initially evaluated over a period of 12 months, with ongoing data collection for 5 years. Discussion The trial will provide robust evidence on a novel approach to providing continuous incentives for improving quality of general practice care, which can be compared to block payment incentives awarded at target quality levels of pay-for-performance, both within Australia and also internationally. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000105246. Registered on 23 January 2018.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4336-2Primary careGeneral practiceQualityContinuity of careFundingIncentivisation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Gregory M. Peterson
Grant Russell
Jan C. Radford
Nick Zwar
Danielle Mazza
Simon Eckermann
Judy Mullan
Marijka J. Batterham
Athena Hammond
Andrew Bonney
spellingShingle Gregory M. Peterson
Grant Russell
Jan C. Radford
Nick Zwar
Danielle Mazza
Simon Eckermann
Judy Mullan
Marijka J. Batterham
Athena Hammond
Andrew Bonney
Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
BMC Health Services Research
Primary care
General practice
Quality
Continuity of care
Funding
Incentivisation
author_facet Gregory M. Peterson
Grant Russell
Jan C. Radford
Nick Zwar
Danielle Mazza
Simon Eckermann
Judy Mullan
Marijka J. Batterham
Athena Hammond
Andrew Bonney
author_sort Gregory M. Peterson
title Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
title_short Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
title_full Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
title_fullStr Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (EQuIP-GP): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in Australian general practice to improve patient care
title_sort effectiveness of quality incentive payments in general practice (equip-gp): a study protocol for a cluster-randomised trial of an outcomes-based funding model in australian general practice to improve patient care
publisher BMC
series BMC Health Services Research
issn 1472-6963
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Abstract Background There is international interest in whether improved primary care, in particular for patients with chronic or complex conditions, can lead to decreased use of health resources and whether financial incentives help achieve this goal. This trial (EQuIP-GP) will investigate whether a funding model based upon targeted, continuous quality incentive payments for Australian general practices increases relational continuity of care, and lessens health-service utilisation, for high-risk patients and children. Methods We will use a mixed methods approach incorporating a two-arm pragmatic cluster randomised control trial with nested qualitative case studies. We aim to recruit 36 general practices from Practice-Based Research Networks (PBRN) covering urban and regional areas of Australia, randomised into intervention and control groups. Control practices will provide usual care while intervention practices will be supported to implement a new service model incorporating incentives for relational continuity and timely access to appointments. Patients will comprise three groups: older (over 65 years); 18–65 years with chronic and/or complex conditions; and those aged less than 16 years with increased risk of hospitalisation. The funding model includes financial incentives to general practitioners (GPs) for providing longer consultations, same day access and timely follow-up after hospitalisation to enrolled patients. The payments are proportional to expected health system savings associated with improved quality of GP care. An outreach facilitator will work with practices to help incorporate the incentive model into usual work. The main outcome measure is relational continuity of care (Primary Care Assessment Tool short-form survey), with secondary outcomes including health-related quality of life and health service use (hospitalisations, emergency presentations, GP and specialist services in the community, medicine prescriptions and targeted pathology and imaging ordering). Outcomes will be initially evaluated over a period of 12 months, with ongoing data collection for 5 years. Discussion The trial will provide robust evidence on a novel approach to providing continuous incentives for improving quality of general practice care, which can be compared to block payment incentives awarded at target quality levels of pay-for-performance, both within Australia and also internationally. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12618000105246. Registered on 23 January 2018.
topic Primary care
General practice
Quality
Continuity of care
Funding
Incentivisation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4336-2
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorympeterson effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT grantrussell effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT jancradford effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT nickzwar effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT daniellemazza effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT simoneckermann effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT judymullan effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT marijkajbatterham effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT athenahammond effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
AT andrewbonney effectivenessofqualityincentivepaymentsingeneralpracticeequipgpastudyprotocolforaclusterrandomisedtrialofanoutcomesbasedfundingmodelinaustraliangeneralpracticetoimprovepatientcare
_version_ 1724721844646313984