The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke
Objective: To evaluate the value of autoantibody and viral serologic examinations in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and stroke and their effect on the course of treatment. Materials and Methods: Patients who were admitted to the neurology clinic between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Galenos Yayinevi
2019-12-01
|
Series: | Türk Nöroloji Dergisi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.tjn.org.tr/jvi.aspx?pdir=tjn&plng=eng&un=TJN-09735&look4= |
id |
doaj-ee84addc84da45c79e48829a9bce5405 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ee84addc84da45c79e48829a9bce54052021-09-02T15:19:46ZengGalenos YayineviTürk Nöroloji Dergisi1309-25452019-12-0125420821310.4274/tnd.galenos.2019.09735The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and StrokeAhmet0Utku Ogan1Berna2Nefati3ŞairAkyıldızKorkmazgilKıylıoğluObjective: To evaluate the value of autoantibody and viral serologic examinations in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and stroke and their effect on the course of treatment. Materials and Methods: Patients who were admitted to the neurology clinic between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were screened for autoantibodies including anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-dsDNA, and viral serology including Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2. The study cohort was grouped as the MS group, stroke group, and “other” diseases group (e.g. polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, dementia, headache, epilepsy). The data from all the groups were further analyzed to determine whether these tests provided an increase in diagnostic performance. Results: Among the autoantibody and viral serologic tests, the most commonly used test was ANA (71 cases in the MS group, 160 cases in the stroke group, and 482 cases in the other diseases group). All test reports, based on positivity/negativity, did not lead to any change in the initial diagnosis of the disease and the treatment strategy in all groups. Conclusion: Information obtained from autoantibody and viral serologic tests does not affect the diagnosis of MS and stroke. Performing these tests for routine screening is considered worthless unless there is an important finding regarding clinical disease.http://www.tjn.org.tr/jvi.aspx?pdir=tjn&plng=eng&un=TJN-09735&look4=multiple sclerosisstrokesleanaebvcmv |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Ahmet Utku Ogan Berna Nefati |
spellingShingle |
Ahmet Utku Ogan Berna Nefati The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke Türk Nöroloji Dergisi multiple sclerosis stroke sle ana ebv cmv |
author_facet |
Ahmet Utku Ogan Berna Nefati |
author_sort |
Ahmet |
title |
The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke |
title_short |
The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke |
title_full |
The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke |
title_fullStr |
The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Value of Autoantibody and Viral Serologic Examinations in the Differential Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis and Stroke |
title_sort |
value of autoantibody and viral serologic examinations in the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and stroke |
publisher |
Galenos Yayinevi |
series |
Türk Nöroloji Dergisi |
issn |
1309-2545 |
publishDate |
2019-12-01 |
description |
Objective: To evaluate the value of autoantibody and viral serologic examinations in the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS) and stroke and their effect on the course of treatment.
Materials and Methods: Patients who were admitted to the neurology clinic between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients were screened for autoantibodies including anti-nuclear antibody (ANA) and anti-dsDNA, and viral serology including Epstein-Barr virus, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2. The study cohort was grouped as the MS group, stroke group, and “other” diseases group (e.g. polyneuropathy, myasthenia gravis, dementia, headache, epilepsy). The data from all the groups were further analyzed to determine whether these tests provided an increase in diagnostic performance.
Results: Among the autoantibody and viral serologic tests, the most commonly used test was ANA (71 cases in the MS group, 160 cases in the stroke group, and 482 cases in the other diseases group). All test reports, based on positivity/negativity, did not lead to any change in the initial diagnosis of the disease and the treatment strategy in all groups.
Conclusion: Information obtained from autoantibody and viral serologic tests does not affect the diagnosis of MS and stroke. Performing these tests for routine screening is considered worthless unless there is an important finding regarding clinical disease. |
topic |
multiple sclerosis stroke sle ana ebv cmv |
url |
http://www.tjn.org.tr/jvi.aspx?pdir=tjn&plng=eng&un=TJN-09735&look4= |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT ahmet thevalueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT utkuogan thevalueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT berna thevalueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT nefati thevalueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT ahmet valueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT utkuogan valueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT berna valueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke AT nefati valueofautoantibodyandviralserologicexaminationsinthedifferentialdiagnosisofmultiplesclerosisandstroke |
_version_ |
1721173960333197312 |