Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment is a matter less of science than of science policy. I will first discuss the distinction between science and science policy and their roles in regulatory risk assessment. Then I will focus on factors t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SAGE Publishing
2011-04-01
|
Series: | Dose-Response |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.10-032.Gray |
id |
doaj-ee7a3ac55f3c44358d4110ca161fc4cc |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ee7a3ac55f3c44358d4110ca161fc4cc2020-11-25T03:40:52ZengSAGE PublishingDose-Response1559-32582011-04-01910.2203/dose-response.10-032.GrayHormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science PolicyGeorge GrayThis brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment is a matter less of science than of science policy. I will first discuss the distinction between science and science policy and their roles in regulatory risk assessment. Then I will focus on factors that influence science policy, especially as it relates to the conduct of risk assessments to inform regulatory decisions, with a focus on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The key questions will then be how does hormesis interact with current concepts of science and science policy for risk assessment? Finally, I look ahead to factors that may increase, or decrease, the likelihood of hormesis being incorporated into regulatory risk assessment.https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.10-032.Gray |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
George Gray |
spellingShingle |
George Gray Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy Dose-Response |
author_facet |
George Gray |
author_sort |
George Gray |
title |
Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy |
title_short |
Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy |
title_full |
Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy |
title_fullStr |
Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy |
title_full_unstemmed |
Hormesis in Regulatory Risk Assessment - Science and Science Policy |
title_sort |
hormesis in regulatory risk assessment - science and science policy |
publisher |
SAGE Publishing |
series |
Dose-Response |
issn |
1559-3258 |
publishDate |
2011-04-01 |
description |
This brief commentary will argue that whether hormesis is considered in regulatory risk assessment is a matter less of science than of science policy. I will first discuss the distinction between science and science policy and their roles in regulatory risk assessment. Then I will focus on factors that influence science policy, especially as it relates to the conduct of risk assessments to inform regulatory decisions, with a focus on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The key questions will then be how does hormesis interact with current concepts of science and science policy for risk assessment? Finally, I look ahead to factors that may increase, or decrease, the likelihood of hormesis being incorporated into regulatory risk assessment. |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2203/dose-response.10-032.Gray |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT georgegray hormesisinregulatoryriskassessmentscienceandsciencepolicy |
_version_ |
1724532408089313280 |