Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy

Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ketofol administration in controlling emergence agitation (EA) after sevoflurane-based anesthesia in children undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Subjects and methods: This double-blinded randomized study involved 90 children (3–6 years) sc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sherry N. Rizk, Enas M. Samir
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2014-01-01
Series:Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184913000962
id doaj-ee60eabdf78c49eb823038d8c226de34
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee60eabdf78c49eb823038d8c226de342020-11-25T02:30:50ZengTaylor & Francis GroupEgyptian Journal of Anaesthesia1110-18492014-01-01301131910.1016/j.egja.2013.09.003Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomySherry N. RizkEnas M. SamirObjective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ketofol administration in controlling emergence agitation (EA) after sevoflurane-based anesthesia in children undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Subjects and methods: This double-blinded randomized study involved 90 children (3–6 years) scheduled for elective adenotonsillectomy or adenoidectomy. They were randomly assigned to receive 10 ml of normal saline (control group, C) or, 1 mg/kg propofol in 10 ml saline (group P) or ketofol as 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.25 mg/kg ketamine in 10 ml saline (group K) 10 min before the end of surgery. In PACU, sedation, behavior, pain and severity of EA were assessed using modified Aldrete score, Aono’s scale, Objective Pain Score (OPS) and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, respectively. Results: In ketofol group, OPS was significantly lower compared to propofol and control groups. Recovery criteria were in favor of ketofol and propofol groups including longer time to eye opening (p < 0.001) and time to Aldrete score ⩾ 9 (p = 0.001). Time to discharge from PACU was comparable in the three groups (p = 0.079). EA was significantly more frequent in the control group (p < 0.001), but comparable in ketofol and propofol groups. PAED score was significantly higher in control group compared to ketofol and propofol groups. Ketofol and propofol preserved hemodynamic stability. Conclusion: Ketofol provides a promising new option for controlling emergence agitation with adequate postoperative sedative and analgesic effect, good recovery criteria and hemodynamic stability compared to propofol and control groups in children undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184913000962KetofolEmergence agitationAdenotonsillectomy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sherry N. Rizk
Enas M. Samir
spellingShingle Sherry N. Rizk
Enas M. Samir
Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Ketofol
Emergence agitation
Adenotonsillectomy
author_facet Sherry N. Rizk
Enas M. Samir
author_sort Sherry N. Rizk
title Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
title_short Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
title_full Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
title_fullStr Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
title_full_unstemmed Use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
title_sort use of ketofol to control emergence agitation in children undergoing adenotonsillectomy
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
issn 1110-1849
publishDate 2014-01-01
description Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of ketofol administration in controlling emergence agitation (EA) after sevoflurane-based anesthesia in children undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy. Subjects and methods: This double-blinded randomized study involved 90 children (3–6 years) scheduled for elective adenotonsillectomy or adenoidectomy. They were randomly assigned to receive 10 ml of normal saline (control group, C) or, 1 mg/kg propofol in 10 ml saline (group P) or ketofol as 1 mg/kg propofol and 0.25 mg/kg ketamine in 10 ml saline (group K) 10 min before the end of surgery. In PACU, sedation, behavior, pain and severity of EA were assessed using modified Aldrete score, Aono’s scale, Objective Pain Score (OPS) and Pediatric Anesthesia Emergence Delirium (PAED) scale, respectively. Results: In ketofol group, OPS was significantly lower compared to propofol and control groups. Recovery criteria were in favor of ketofol and propofol groups including longer time to eye opening (p < 0.001) and time to Aldrete score ⩾ 9 (p = 0.001). Time to discharge from PACU was comparable in the three groups (p = 0.079). EA was significantly more frequent in the control group (p < 0.001), but comparable in ketofol and propofol groups. PAED score was significantly higher in control group compared to ketofol and propofol groups. Ketofol and propofol preserved hemodynamic stability. Conclusion: Ketofol provides a promising new option for controlling emergence agitation with adequate postoperative sedative and analgesic effect, good recovery criteria and hemodynamic stability compared to propofol and control groups in children undergoing adenoidectomy or adenotonsillectomy.
topic Ketofol
Emergence agitation
Adenotonsillectomy
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1110184913000962
work_keys_str_mv AT sherrynrizk useofketofoltocontrolemergenceagitationinchildrenundergoingadenotonsillectomy
AT enasmsamir useofketofoltocontrolemergenceagitationinchildrenundergoingadenotonsillectomy
_version_ 1724827489462648832