Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults

Previous reports on racial differences in scam susceptibility have yielded mixed findings, and few studies have examined reasons for any observed race differences. Older Black and White participants without dementia (N = 592) from the Minority Aging Research Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Proje...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. Duke Han, Lisa L. Barnes, Sue Leurgans, Lei Yu, Christopher C. Stewart, Melissa Lamar, Crystal M. Glover, David A. Bennett, Patricia A. Boyle
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685258/full
id doaj-ee422fd4d1a94414bb2a46537d185489
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee422fd4d1a94414bb2a46537d1854892021-07-12T07:02:42ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782021-07-011210.3389/fpsyg.2021.685258685258Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White AdultsS. Duke Han0S. Duke Han1S. Duke Han2S. Duke Han3S. Duke Han4S. Duke Han5S. Duke Han6Lisa L. Barnes7Lisa L. Barnes8Lisa L. Barnes9Sue Leurgans10Sue Leurgans11Lei Yu12Lei Yu13Christopher C. Stewart14Melissa Lamar15Melissa Lamar16Crystal M. Glover17Crystal M. Glover18Crystal M. Glover19David A. Bennett20David A. Bennett21Patricia A. Boyle22Patricia A. Boyle23Department of Family Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesSchool of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Neurological Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesRush Alzheimer's Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, United StatesPrevious reports on racial differences in scam susceptibility have yielded mixed findings, and few studies have examined reasons for any observed race differences. Older Black and White participants without dementia (N = 592) from the Minority Aging Research Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project who completed a susceptibility to scam questionnaire and other measures were matched according to age, education, sex, and global cognition using Mahalanobis distance. In adjusted models, older Black adults were less susceptible to scams than older White adults (Beta = −0.2496, SE = 0.0649, p = 0.0001). Contextual factors did not mediate and affective factors did not moderate this association. Analyses of specific items revealed Black adults had greater knowledge of scam targeting of older adults and were less likely to pick up the phone for unidentified callers. Older Black adults are less susceptible to scams than demographically-matched older White adults, although the reasons remain unknown.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685258/fullsusceptibility to scamsracedisparitiescontextualaffective
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Sue Leurgans
Sue Leurgans
Lei Yu
Lei Yu
Christopher C. Stewart
Melissa Lamar
Melissa Lamar
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
David A. Bennett
David A. Bennett
Patricia A. Boyle
Patricia A. Boyle
spellingShingle S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Sue Leurgans
Sue Leurgans
Lei Yu
Lei Yu
Christopher C. Stewart
Melissa Lamar
Melissa Lamar
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
David A. Bennett
David A. Bennett
Patricia A. Boyle
Patricia A. Boyle
Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
Frontiers in Psychology
susceptibility to scams
race
disparities
contextual
affective
author_facet S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
S. Duke Han
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Lisa L. Barnes
Sue Leurgans
Sue Leurgans
Lei Yu
Lei Yu
Christopher C. Stewart
Melissa Lamar
Melissa Lamar
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
Crystal M. Glover
David A. Bennett
David A. Bennett
Patricia A. Boyle
Patricia A. Boyle
author_sort S. Duke Han
title Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
title_short Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
title_full Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
title_fullStr Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
title_full_unstemmed Susceptibility to Scams in Older Black and White Adults
title_sort susceptibility to scams in older black and white adults
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2021-07-01
description Previous reports on racial differences in scam susceptibility have yielded mixed findings, and few studies have examined reasons for any observed race differences. Older Black and White participants without dementia (N = 592) from the Minority Aging Research Study and the Rush Memory and Aging Project who completed a susceptibility to scam questionnaire and other measures were matched according to age, education, sex, and global cognition using Mahalanobis distance. In adjusted models, older Black adults were less susceptible to scams than older White adults (Beta = −0.2496, SE = 0.0649, p = 0.0001). Contextual factors did not mediate and affective factors did not moderate this association. Analyses of specific items revealed Black adults had greater knowledge of scam targeting of older adults and were less likely to pick up the phone for unidentified callers. Older Black adults are less susceptible to scams than demographically-matched older White adults, although the reasons remain unknown.
topic susceptibility to scams
race
disparities
contextual
affective
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.685258/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sdukehan susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT lisalbarnes susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT lisalbarnes susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT lisalbarnes susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sueleurgans susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT sueleurgans susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT leiyu susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT leiyu susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT christophercstewart susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT melissalamar susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT melissalamar susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT crystalmglover susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT crystalmglover susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT crystalmglover susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT davidabennett susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT davidabennett susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT patriciaaboyle susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
AT patriciaaboyle susceptibilitytoscamsinolderblackandwhiteadults
_version_ 1721307726297956352