Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The location specific motor pattern generation properties of the spinal cord along its rostro-caudal axis have been demonstrated. However, it is still unclear that these differences are due to the different spinal interneuronal netwo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Stelescu András, Sümegi János, Wéber Ildikó, Birinyi András, Wolf Ervin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-06-01
Series:BMC Neuroscience
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/68
id doaj-ee41dcfb121d4529acd2d9099831d997
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee41dcfb121d4529acd2d9099831d9972020-11-24T21:41:32ZengBMCBMC Neuroscience1471-22022012-06-011316810.1186/1471-2202-13-68Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>Stelescu AndrásSümegi JánosWéber IldikóBirinyi AndrásWolf Ervin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The location specific motor pattern generation properties of the spinal cord along its rostro-caudal axis have been demonstrated. However, it is still unclear that these differences are due to the different spinal interneuronal networks underlying locomotions or there are also segmental differences in motoneurons innervating different limbs. Frogs use their fore- and hindlimbs differently during jumping and swimming. Therefore we hypothesized that limb innervating motoneurons, located in the cervical and lumbar spinal cord, are different in their morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties. The test of this hypothesis what we report here.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Discriminant analysis classified segmental origin of the intracellularly labeled and three-dimensionally reconstructed motoneurons 100% correctly based on twelve morphological variables. Somata of lumbar motoneurons were rounder; the dendrites had bigger total length, more branches with higher branching orders and different spatial distributions of branch points. The ventro-medial extent of cervical dendrites was bigger than in lumbar motoneurons. Computational models of the motoneurons showed that dendritic signal transfer properties were also different in the two groups of motoneurons. Whether log attenuations were higher or lower in cervical than in lumbar motoneurons depended on the proximity of dendritic input to the soma. To investigate dendritic voltage and current transfer properties imposed by dendritic architecture rather than by neuronal size we used standardized distributions of transfer variables. We introduced a novel combination of cluster analysis and homogeneity indexes to quantify segmental segregation tendencies of motoneurons based on their dendritic transfer properties. A segregation tendency of cervical and lumbar motoneurons was detected by the rates of steady-state and transient voltage-amplitude transfers from dendrites to soma at all levels of synaptic background activities, modeled by varying the specific dendritic membrane resistance. On the other hand no segregation was observed by the steady-state current transfer except under high background activity.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found size-dependent and size-independent differences in morphology and electrical structure of the limb moving motoneurons based on their spinal segmental location in frogs. Location specificity of locomotor networks is therefore partly due to segmental differences in motoneurons driving fore-, and hindlimbs.</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/68
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Stelescu András
Sümegi János
Wéber Ildikó
Birinyi András
Wolf Ervin
spellingShingle Stelescu András
Sümegi János
Wéber Ildikó
Birinyi András
Wolf Ervin
Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
BMC Neuroscience
author_facet Stelescu András
Sümegi János
Wéber Ildikó
Birinyi András
Wolf Ervin
author_sort Stelescu András
title Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
title_short Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
title_full Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
title_fullStr Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
title_full_unstemmed Somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>Rana esculenta</it>
title_sort somato-dendritic morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties differentiate between fore- and hindlimb innervating motoneurons in the frog <it>rana esculenta</it>
publisher BMC
series BMC Neuroscience
issn 1471-2202
publishDate 2012-06-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>The location specific motor pattern generation properties of the spinal cord along its rostro-caudal axis have been demonstrated. However, it is still unclear that these differences are due to the different spinal interneuronal networks underlying locomotions or there are also segmental differences in motoneurons innervating different limbs. Frogs use their fore- and hindlimbs differently during jumping and swimming. Therefore we hypothesized that limb innervating motoneurons, located in the cervical and lumbar spinal cord, are different in their morphology and dendritic signal transfer properties. The test of this hypothesis what we report here.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Discriminant analysis classified segmental origin of the intracellularly labeled and three-dimensionally reconstructed motoneurons 100% correctly based on twelve morphological variables. Somata of lumbar motoneurons were rounder; the dendrites had bigger total length, more branches with higher branching orders and different spatial distributions of branch points. The ventro-medial extent of cervical dendrites was bigger than in lumbar motoneurons. Computational models of the motoneurons showed that dendritic signal transfer properties were also different in the two groups of motoneurons. Whether log attenuations were higher or lower in cervical than in lumbar motoneurons depended on the proximity of dendritic input to the soma. To investigate dendritic voltage and current transfer properties imposed by dendritic architecture rather than by neuronal size we used standardized distributions of transfer variables. We introduced a novel combination of cluster analysis and homogeneity indexes to quantify segmental segregation tendencies of motoneurons based on their dendritic transfer properties. A segregation tendency of cervical and lumbar motoneurons was detected by the rates of steady-state and transient voltage-amplitude transfers from dendrites to soma at all levels of synaptic background activities, modeled by varying the specific dendritic membrane resistance. On the other hand no segregation was observed by the steady-state current transfer except under high background activity.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>We found size-dependent and size-independent differences in morphology and electrical structure of the limb moving motoneurons based on their spinal segmental location in frogs. Location specificity of locomotor networks is therefore partly due to segmental differences in motoneurons driving fore-, and hindlimbs.</p>
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/13/68
work_keys_str_mv AT stelescuandras somatodendriticmorphologyanddendriticsignaltransferpropertiesdifferentiatebetweenforeandhindlimbinnervatingmotoneuronsinthefrogitranaesculentait
AT sumegijanos somatodendriticmorphologyanddendriticsignaltransferpropertiesdifferentiatebetweenforeandhindlimbinnervatingmotoneuronsinthefrogitranaesculentait
AT weberildiko somatodendriticmorphologyanddendriticsignaltransferpropertiesdifferentiatebetweenforeandhindlimbinnervatingmotoneuronsinthefrogitranaesculentait
AT birinyiandras somatodendriticmorphologyanddendriticsignaltransferpropertiesdifferentiatebetweenforeandhindlimbinnervatingmotoneuronsinthefrogitranaesculentait
AT wolfervin somatodendriticmorphologyanddendriticsignaltransferpropertiesdifferentiatebetweenforeandhindlimbinnervatingmotoneuronsinthefrogitranaesculentait
_version_ 1725921549173653504