Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review

The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review in order to synthesize the evidence-based literature on mathematics education among students with visual impairment (VI). Studies were identified through searches of electronic databases (SCOPUS, PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science). The authors i...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Oliv G. Klingenberg, Anne H. Holkesvik, Liv Berit Augestad
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2019-01-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1626322
id doaj-ee24430506bb4cad9982c0d30838b6bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee24430506bb4cad9982c0d30838b6bd2021-02-18T10:31:41ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2019-01-016110.1080/2331186X.2019.16263221626322Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic reviewOliv G. Klingenberg0Anne H. Holkesvik1Liv Berit Augestad2Statped midtStatped LibraryStatped midtThe aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review in order to synthesize the evidence-based literature on mathematics education among students with visual impairment (VI). Studies were identified through searches of electronic databases (SCOPUS, PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science). The authors included articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2017. Eleven publications met the inclusion criteria, and seven studies had observational designs. The studies focused on teachers’ attitudes and experiences, the use of abacus, tactile graphics, and the development of mathematical concepts. The results showed that the studies had different aims and methods, and only four studies reported eye disorder diagnoses. The ability to choose suitable teaching strategies that involve individual instructions requires qualified and enthusiastic teachers who allow students to experience a sense of accomplishment and success. Additionally, it is important to gain information on eye disorder diagnoses and possible learning disabilities. The authors conclude that it is to be expected that students with VI but without cognitive disabilities will follow their grade level in mathematics. The findings highlight the need for more randomly controlled, high quality trials in order to obtain more evidence and knowledge of mathematics education among students with VI.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1626322visual impairmentbraillemathematics educationabacustactile graphicsstudentssystematic review
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Oliv G. Klingenberg
Anne H. Holkesvik
Liv Berit Augestad
spellingShingle Oliv G. Klingenberg
Anne H. Holkesvik
Liv Berit Augestad
Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
Cogent Education
visual impairment
braille
mathematics education
abacus
tactile graphics
students
systematic review
author_facet Oliv G. Klingenberg
Anne H. Holkesvik
Liv Berit Augestad
author_sort Oliv G. Klingenberg
title Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
title_short Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
title_full Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
title_fullStr Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: A systematic review
title_sort research evidence for mathematics education for students with visual impairment: a systematic review
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Education
issn 2331-186X
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The aim of the study was to conduct a systematic review in order to synthesize the evidence-based literature on mathematics education among students with visual impairment (VI). Studies were identified through searches of electronic databases (SCOPUS, PubMed, ERIC, and Web of Science). The authors included articles published between 1 January 2000 and 31 October 2017. Eleven publications met the inclusion criteria, and seven studies had observational designs. The studies focused on teachers’ attitudes and experiences, the use of abacus, tactile graphics, and the development of mathematical concepts. The results showed that the studies had different aims and methods, and only four studies reported eye disorder diagnoses. The ability to choose suitable teaching strategies that involve individual instructions requires qualified and enthusiastic teachers who allow students to experience a sense of accomplishment and success. Additionally, it is important to gain information on eye disorder diagnoses and possible learning disabilities. The authors conclude that it is to be expected that students with VI but without cognitive disabilities will follow their grade level in mathematics. The findings highlight the need for more randomly controlled, high quality trials in order to obtain more evidence and knowledge of mathematics education among students with VI.
topic visual impairment
braille
mathematics education
abacus
tactile graphics
students
systematic review
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2019.1626322
work_keys_str_mv AT olivgklingenberg researchevidenceformathematicseducationforstudentswithvisualimpairmentasystematicreview
AT annehholkesvik researchevidenceformathematicseducationforstudentswithvisualimpairmentasystematicreview
AT livberitaugestad researchevidenceformathematicseducationforstudentswithvisualimpairmentasystematicreview
_version_ 1724263615154880512