Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran

Although the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dian Sukmawati, Ade Armando
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah Kuala 2020-12-01
Series:JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global)
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774
id doaj-ee153b55d4bc4db0b9cadf7ad09fa1c8
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee153b55d4bc4db0b9cadf7ad09fa1c82021-06-30T01:41:40ZengProgram Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah KualaJKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global) 2614-79982614-218X2020-12-018215117310.24815/jkg.v8i2.1477410589Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi SiaranDian Sukmawati0Ade Armando1Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta RayaUniversitas IndonesiaAlthough the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this research investigated the authority of KPI in terms of being a watchdog of television content in Indonesia. This research deployed political economy theory because it has studied not only media analysis in general but also the problems faced by the media industry and who controlled media. To criticize the authority of KPI in maintaining a code of conduct over the broadcasting content, three KPI’s commissioners, two television program representatives, and a media observer were interviewed. Based on interviews, the researcher found that dialogue preferred by KPI in supervising the television content confirmed that the current KPI’s commissioner has compromised with private television stations. KPI is more likely to support the existing television business system nowadays to gain maximum profit for the media investor. The findings suggest that role as KPI’s commissioner has been used to gain more power in the future.http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774indonesian broadcasting commissioncommercial broadcastingauthoritypolitical economy
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Dian Sukmawati
Ade Armando
spellingShingle Dian Sukmawati
Ade Armando
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global)
indonesian broadcasting commission
commercial broadcasting
authority
political economy
author_facet Dian Sukmawati
Ade Armando
author_sort Dian Sukmawati
title Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
title_short Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
title_full Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
title_fullStr Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
title_full_unstemmed Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
title_sort otoritas komisi penyiaran indonesia dalam pengaturan isi siaran
publisher Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah Kuala
series JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global)
issn 2614-7998
2614-218X
publishDate 2020-12-01
description Although the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this research investigated the authority of KPI in terms of being a watchdog of television content in Indonesia. This research deployed political economy theory because it has studied not only media analysis in general but also the problems faced by the media industry and who controlled media. To criticize the authority of KPI in maintaining a code of conduct over the broadcasting content, three KPI’s commissioners, two television program representatives, and a media observer were interviewed. Based on interviews, the researcher found that dialogue preferred by KPI in supervising the television content confirmed that the current KPI’s commissioner has compromised with private television stations. KPI is more likely to support the existing television business system nowadays to gain maximum profit for the media investor. The findings suggest that role as KPI’s commissioner has been used to gain more power in the future.
topic indonesian broadcasting commission
commercial broadcasting
authority
political economy
url http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774
work_keys_str_mv AT diansukmawati otoritaskomisipenyiaranindonesiadalampengaturanisisiaran
AT adearmando otoritaskomisipenyiaranindonesiadalampengaturanisisiaran
_version_ 1721353860511956992