Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran
Although the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah Kuala
2020-12-01
|
Series: | JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global) |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774 |
id |
doaj-ee153b55d4bc4db0b9cadf7ad09fa1c8 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ee153b55d4bc4db0b9cadf7ad09fa1c82021-06-30T01:41:40ZengProgram Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah KualaJKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global) 2614-79982614-218X2020-12-018215117310.24815/jkg.v8i2.1477410589Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi SiaranDian Sukmawati0Ade Armando1Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta RayaUniversitas IndonesiaAlthough the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this research investigated the authority of KPI in terms of being a watchdog of television content in Indonesia. This research deployed political economy theory because it has studied not only media analysis in general but also the problems faced by the media industry and who controlled media. To criticize the authority of KPI in maintaining a code of conduct over the broadcasting content, three KPI’s commissioners, two television program representatives, and a media observer were interviewed. Based on interviews, the researcher found that dialogue preferred by KPI in supervising the television content confirmed that the current KPI’s commissioner has compromised with private television stations. KPI is more likely to support the existing television business system nowadays to gain maximum profit for the media investor. The findings suggest that role as KPI’s commissioner has been used to gain more power in the future.http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774indonesian broadcasting commissioncommercial broadcastingauthoritypolitical economy |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Dian Sukmawati Ade Armando |
spellingShingle |
Dian Sukmawati Ade Armando Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global) indonesian broadcasting commission commercial broadcasting authority political economy |
author_facet |
Dian Sukmawati Ade Armando |
author_sort |
Dian Sukmawati |
title |
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran |
title_short |
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran |
title_full |
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran |
title_fullStr |
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran |
title_full_unstemmed |
Otoritas Komisi Penyiaran Indonesia dalam Pengaturan Isi Siaran |
title_sort |
otoritas komisi penyiaran indonesia dalam pengaturan isi siaran |
publisher |
Program Studi Ilmu Komunikasi Universitas Syiah Kuala |
series |
JKG (Jurnal Komunikasi Global) |
issn |
2614-7998 2614-218X |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Although the Indonesian Broadcasting Commission (KPI) supervised all of the television programs, there are a lot of programs getting a warning because of breaking the rule of P Broadcasting Code of Conduct (P3) and Broadcasting Program Standard (SPS). Focusing on program Pagi-Pagi Pasti Happy, this research investigated the authority of KPI in terms of being a watchdog of television content in Indonesia. This research deployed political economy theory because it has studied not only media analysis in general but also the problems faced by the media industry and who controlled media. To criticize the authority of KPI in maintaining a code of conduct over the broadcasting content, three KPI’s commissioners, two television program representatives, and a media observer were interviewed. Based on interviews, the researcher found that dialogue preferred by KPI in supervising the television content confirmed that the current KPI’s commissioner has compromised with private television stations. KPI is more likely to support the existing television business system nowadays to gain maximum profit for the media investor. The findings suggest that role as KPI’s commissioner has been used to gain more power in the future. |
topic |
indonesian broadcasting commission commercial broadcasting authority political economy |
url |
http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/JKG/article/view/14774 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT diansukmawati otoritaskomisipenyiaranindonesiadalampengaturanisisiaran AT adearmando otoritaskomisipenyiaranindonesiadalampengaturanisisiaran |
_version_ |
1721353860511956992 |