Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garn...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2013-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render |
id |
doaj-ee016e68a8bc4ea98ba7f9db0eb960fa |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ee016e68a8bc4ea98ba7f9db0eb960fa2020-11-25T02:09:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0184e5997010.1371/journal.pone.0059970Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.Julian W TangAndre D NicolleChristian A KlettnerJovan PantelicLiangde WangAmin Bin SuhaimiAshlynn Y L TanGarrett W X OngRuikun SuChandra SekharDavid D W CheongKwok Wai ThamNatural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garnered much attention as potential, explosive sources of infectious aerosols, these are relatively rare events during daily life, whereas breathing is necessary for life and is performed continuously. Real-time shadowgraph imaging was used to visualise and capture high-speed images of healthy volunteers sneezing and breathing (through the nose - nasally, and through the mouth - orally). Six volunteers, who were able to respond to the pepper sneeze stimulus, were recruited for the sneezing experiments (2 women: 27.5±6.36 years; 4 men: 29.25±10.53 years). The maximum visible distance over which the sneeze plumes (or puffs) travelled was 0.6 m, the maximum sneeze velocity derived from these measured distances was 4.5 m/s. The maximum 2-dimensional (2-D) area of dissemination of these sneezes was 0.2 m(2). The corresponding derived parameter, the maximum 2-D area expansion rate of these sneezes was 2 m(2)/s. For nasal breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.6 m and 1.4 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.11 m(2) and 0.16 m(2)/s, respectively. Similarly, for mouth breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.8 m and 1.3 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.18 m(2) and 0.17 m(2)/s, respectively. Surprisingly, a comparison of the maximum exit velocities of sneezing reported here with those obtained from coughing (published previously) demonstrated that they are relatively similar, and not extremely high. This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Julian W Tang Andre D Nicolle Christian A Klettner Jovan Pantelic Liangde Wang Amin Bin Suhaimi Ashlynn Y L Tan Garrett W X Ong Ruikun Su Chandra Sekhar David D W Cheong Kwok Wai Tham |
spellingShingle |
Julian W Tang Andre D Nicolle Christian A Klettner Jovan Pantelic Liangde Wang Amin Bin Suhaimi Ashlynn Y L Tan Garrett W X Ong Ruikun Su Chandra Sekhar David D W Cheong Kwok Wai Tham Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. PLoS ONE |
author_facet |
Julian W Tang Andre D Nicolle Christian A Klettner Jovan Pantelic Liangde Wang Amin Bin Suhaimi Ashlynn Y L Tan Garrett W X Ong Ruikun Su Chandra Sekhar David D W Cheong Kwok Wai Tham |
author_sort |
Julian W Tang |
title |
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
title_short |
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
title_full |
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
title_fullStr |
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
title_full_unstemmed |
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
title_sort |
airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols. |
publisher |
Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
series |
PLoS ONE |
issn |
1932-6203 |
publishDate |
2013-01-01 |
description |
Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garnered much attention as potential, explosive sources of infectious aerosols, these are relatively rare events during daily life, whereas breathing is necessary for life and is performed continuously. Real-time shadowgraph imaging was used to visualise and capture high-speed images of healthy volunteers sneezing and breathing (through the nose - nasally, and through the mouth - orally). Six volunteers, who were able to respond to the pepper sneeze stimulus, were recruited for the sneezing experiments (2 women: 27.5±6.36 years; 4 men: 29.25±10.53 years). The maximum visible distance over which the sneeze plumes (or puffs) travelled was 0.6 m, the maximum sneeze velocity derived from these measured distances was 4.5 m/s. The maximum 2-dimensional (2-D) area of dissemination of these sneezes was 0.2 m(2). The corresponding derived parameter, the maximum 2-D area expansion rate of these sneezes was 2 m(2)/s. For nasal breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.6 m and 1.4 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.11 m(2) and 0.16 m(2)/s, respectively. Similarly, for mouth breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.8 m and 1.3 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.18 m(2) and 0.17 m(2)/s, respectively. Surprisingly, a comparison of the maximum exit velocities of sneezing reported here with those obtained from coughing (published previously) demonstrated that they are relatively similar, and not extremely high. This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed. |
url |
http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT julianwtang airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT andrednicolle airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT christianaklettner airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT jovanpantelic airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT liangdewang airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT aminbinsuhaimi airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT ashlynnyltan airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT garrettwxong airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT ruikunsu airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT chandrasekhar airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT daviddwcheong airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols AT kwokwaitham airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols |
_version_ |
1724924928363331584 |