Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.

Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garn...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Julian W Tang, Andre D Nicolle, Christian A Klettner, Jovan Pantelic, Liangde Wang, Amin Bin Suhaimi, Ashlynn Y L Tan, Garrett W X Ong, Ruikun Su, Chandra Sekhar, David D W Cheong, Kwok Wai Tham
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2013-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render
id doaj-ee016e68a8bc4ea98ba7f9db0eb960fa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ee016e68a8bc4ea98ba7f9db0eb960fa2020-11-25T02:09:16ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032013-01-0184e5997010.1371/journal.pone.0059970Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.Julian W TangAndre D NicolleChristian A KlettnerJovan PantelicLiangde WangAmin Bin SuhaimiAshlynn Y L TanGarrett W X OngRuikun SuChandra SekharDavid D W CheongKwok Wai ThamNatural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garnered much attention as potential, explosive sources of infectious aerosols, these are relatively rare events during daily life, whereas breathing is necessary for life and is performed continuously. Real-time shadowgraph imaging was used to visualise and capture high-speed images of healthy volunteers sneezing and breathing (through the nose - nasally, and through the mouth - orally). Six volunteers, who were able to respond to the pepper sneeze stimulus, were recruited for the sneezing experiments (2 women: 27.5±6.36 years; 4 men: 29.25±10.53 years). The maximum visible distance over which the sneeze plumes (or puffs) travelled was 0.6 m, the maximum sneeze velocity derived from these measured distances was 4.5 m/s. The maximum 2-dimensional (2-D) area of dissemination of these sneezes was 0.2 m(2). The corresponding derived parameter, the maximum 2-D area expansion rate of these sneezes was 2 m(2)/s. For nasal breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.6 m and 1.4 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.11 m(2) and 0.16 m(2)/s, respectively. Similarly, for mouth breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.8 m and 1.3 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.18 m(2) and 0.17 m(2)/s, respectively. Surprisingly, a comparison of the maximum exit velocities of sneezing reported here with those obtained from coughing (published previously) demonstrated that they are relatively similar, and not extremely high. This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Julian W Tang
Andre D Nicolle
Christian A Klettner
Jovan Pantelic
Liangde Wang
Amin Bin Suhaimi
Ashlynn Y L Tan
Garrett W X Ong
Ruikun Su
Chandra Sekhar
David D W Cheong
Kwok Wai Tham
spellingShingle Julian W Tang
Andre D Nicolle
Christian A Klettner
Jovan Pantelic
Liangde Wang
Amin Bin Suhaimi
Ashlynn Y L Tan
Garrett W X Ong
Ruikun Su
Chandra Sekhar
David D W Cheong
Kwok Wai Tham
Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Julian W Tang
Andre D Nicolle
Christian A Klettner
Jovan Pantelic
Liangde Wang
Amin Bin Suhaimi
Ashlynn Y L Tan
Garrett W X Ong
Ruikun Su
Chandra Sekhar
David D W Cheong
Kwok Wai Tham
author_sort Julian W Tang
title Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
title_short Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
title_full Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
title_fullStr Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
title_full_unstemmed Airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
title_sort airflow dynamics of human jets: sneezing and breathing - potential sources of infectious aerosols.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Natural human exhalation flows such as coughing, sneezing and breathing can be considered as 'jet-like' airflows in the sense that they are produced from a single source in a single exhalation effort, with a relatively symmetrical, conical geometry. Although coughing and sneezing have garnered much attention as potential, explosive sources of infectious aerosols, these are relatively rare events during daily life, whereas breathing is necessary for life and is performed continuously. Real-time shadowgraph imaging was used to visualise and capture high-speed images of healthy volunteers sneezing and breathing (through the nose - nasally, and through the mouth - orally). Six volunteers, who were able to respond to the pepper sneeze stimulus, were recruited for the sneezing experiments (2 women: 27.5±6.36 years; 4 men: 29.25±10.53 years). The maximum visible distance over which the sneeze plumes (or puffs) travelled was 0.6 m, the maximum sneeze velocity derived from these measured distances was 4.5 m/s. The maximum 2-dimensional (2-D) area of dissemination of these sneezes was 0.2 m(2). The corresponding derived parameter, the maximum 2-D area expansion rate of these sneezes was 2 m(2)/s. For nasal breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.6 m and 1.4 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.11 m(2) and 0.16 m(2)/s, respectively. Similarly, for mouth breathing, the maximum propagation distance and derived velocity were 0.8 m and 1.3 m/s, respectively. The maximum 2-D area of dissemination and derived expansion rate were 0.18 m(2) and 0.17 m(2)/s, respectively. Surprisingly, a comparison of the maximum exit velocities of sneezing reported here with those obtained from coughing (published previously) demonstrated that they are relatively similar, and not extremely high. This is in contrast with some earlier estimates of sneeze velocities, and some reasons for this difference are discussed.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3613375?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT julianwtang airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT andrednicolle airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT christianaklettner airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT jovanpantelic airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT liangdewang airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT aminbinsuhaimi airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT ashlynnyltan airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT garrettwxong airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT ruikunsu airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT chandrasekhar airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT daviddwcheong airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
AT kwokwaitham airflowdynamicsofhumanjetssneezingandbreathingpotentialsourcesofinfectiousaerosols
_version_ 1724924928363331584