Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution

Characterization of precipitation is critical in quantifying distributed catchment-wide discharge. The gauge network is a key driver in hydrologic modeling to characterize discharge. The accuracy of precipitation is dependent on the location of stations, the density of the network, and the interpola...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christopher L. Shope, Ganga Ram Maharjan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2015-01-01
Series:Advances in Meteorology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174196
id doaj-edd0102bb239414e83daf909e096a136
record_format Article
spelling doaj-edd0102bb239414e83daf909e096a1362020-11-25T00:48:22ZengHindawi LimitedAdvances in Meteorology1687-93091687-93172015-01-01201510.1155/2015/174196174196Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use DistributionChristopher L. Shope0Ganga Ram Maharjan1U.S. Geological Survey, Utah Water Science Center, 2329 W. Orton Circle, Salt Lake City, UT 84119, USADepartment of Soil Physics, University of Bayreuth, 95447 Bayreuth, GermanyCharacterization of precipitation is critical in quantifying distributed catchment-wide discharge. The gauge network is a key driver in hydrologic modeling to characterize discharge. The accuracy of precipitation is dependent on the location of stations, the density of the network, and the interpolation scheme. Our study examines 16 weather stations in a 64 km2 catchment. We develop a weighted, distributed approach for gap-filling the observed meteorological dataset. We analyze five interpolation methods (Thiessen, IDW, nearest neighbor, spline, and ordinary Kriging) at five gauge densities. We utilize precipitation in a SWAT model to estimate discharge in lumped parameter simulations and in a distributed approach at the multiple densities (1, 16, 50, 142, and 300 stations). Gauge density has a substantial impact on distributed discharge and the optimal gauge density is between 50 and 142 stations. Our results also indicate that the IDW interpolation scheme was optimum, although the Kriging and Thiessen polygon methods produced similar results. To further examine variability in discharge, we characterized the land use and soil distribution throughout each of the subbasins. The optimal rain gauge position and distribution of the gauges drastically influence catchment-wide runoff. We found that it is best to locate the gauges near less permeable locations.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174196
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christopher L. Shope
Ganga Ram Maharjan
spellingShingle Christopher L. Shope
Ganga Ram Maharjan
Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
Advances in Meteorology
author_facet Christopher L. Shope
Ganga Ram Maharjan
author_sort Christopher L. Shope
title Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
title_short Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
title_full Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
title_fullStr Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
title_full_unstemmed Modeling Spatiotemporal Precipitation: Effects of Density, Interpolation, and Land Use Distribution
title_sort modeling spatiotemporal precipitation: effects of density, interpolation, and land use distribution
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Advances in Meteorology
issn 1687-9309
1687-9317
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Characterization of precipitation is critical in quantifying distributed catchment-wide discharge. The gauge network is a key driver in hydrologic modeling to characterize discharge. The accuracy of precipitation is dependent on the location of stations, the density of the network, and the interpolation scheme. Our study examines 16 weather stations in a 64 km2 catchment. We develop a weighted, distributed approach for gap-filling the observed meteorological dataset. We analyze five interpolation methods (Thiessen, IDW, nearest neighbor, spline, and ordinary Kriging) at five gauge densities. We utilize precipitation in a SWAT model to estimate discharge in lumped parameter simulations and in a distributed approach at the multiple densities (1, 16, 50, 142, and 300 stations). Gauge density has a substantial impact on distributed discharge and the optimal gauge density is between 50 and 142 stations. Our results also indicate that the IDW interpolation scheme was optimum, although the Kriging and Thiessen polygon methods produced similar results. To further examine variability in discharge, we characterized the land use and soil distribution throughout each of the subbasins. The optimal rain gauge position and distribution of the gauges drastically influence catchment-wide runoff. We found that it is best to locate the gauges near less permeable locations.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/174196
work_keys_str_mv AT christopherlshope modelingspatiotemporalprecipitationeffectsofdensityinterpolationandlandusedistribution
AT gangarammaharjan modelingspatiotemporalprecipitationeffectsofdensityinterpolationandlandusedistribution
_version_ 1725256372990246912