A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Introduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectivel...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Heart India |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Bhandari |
id |
doaj-edc1006bddb147428fd0d648524f9bb7 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-edc1006bddb147428fd0d648524f9bb72020-11-24T22:13:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsHeart India2321-449X2018-01-01639710110.4103/heartindia.heartindia_32_18A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromeMonika BhandariPravesh VishwakarmaMukul MisraVarun Shankar NarainAkshyaya PradhanRishi SethiIntroduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectively. Hence the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor appears to be a reasonable option as they act on the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Though frequently used in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PC1), their use in patients not undergoing such procedure is not popular despite evidence in literature. Materials and Methods: This study was done on 44 patients of NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion in two groups. The patients in group 1 received tirofiban(0.4μg/kg/min i.v for 30 min followed by 0.1μg/kg/min for 48 hours) in addition to aspirin (325 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily), clopidogrel (300 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily) and enoxaparin (1 mg/kg S.C bid for 5 days). The group 2 patients received DAPT and enoxaparin only, in similar doses. Both the groups received antianginal therapy as appropriate and statins. Results: The study showed the benefits of adding tirofiban to enoxaparin and DAPT irrespective of age, sex, presence or absence of diabetes and dyslipidemia, ECG changes, troponin positivity and TIMI score in patients with NSTE-ACS. There was a significant reduction {Risk reduction (RR) of 45.4% P <0.01} in composite of primary end points refractory ischemia myocardial infarction (MI) and death with Tirofiban. No major or minor bleeding episodes were seen in any patients. Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that tirofiban in addition to DAPT and enoxaparin reduces the risk of refractory ischemia, MI and death in patients with NSTE-ACS without any additional risk of major or minor bleeding. Therefore, we advocate this regimen in patients with NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. Large randomized study is needed to recommend this regimen.http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=BhandariAntiplatelet resistanceGPIIb/IIIa inhibitorsmyocardial infarctionnon-ST elevation NSTE-ACS |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Monika Bhandari Pravesh Vishwakarma Mukul Misra Varun Shankar Narain Akshyaya Pradhan Rishi Sethi |
spellingShingle |
Monika Bhandari Pravesh Vishwakarma Mukul Misra Varun Shankar Narain Akshyaya Pradhan Rishi Sethi A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome Heart India Antiplatelet resistance GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors myocardial infarction non-ST elevation NSTE-ACS |
author_facet |
Monika Bhandari Pravesh Vishwakarma Mukul Misra Varun Shankar Narain Akshyaya Pradhan Rishi Sethi |
author_sort |
Monika Bhandari |
title |
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_short |
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_full |
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_fullStr |
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome |
title_sort |
comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-st elevation acute coronary syndrome |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Heart India |
issn |
2321-449X |
publishDate |
2018-01-01 |
description |
Introduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectively. Hence the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor appears to be a reasonable option as they act on the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Though frequently used in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PC1), their use in patients not undergoing such procedure is not popular despite evidence in literature.
Materials and Methods: This study was done on 44 patients of NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion in two groups. The patients in group 1 received tirofiban(0.4μg/kg/min i.v for 30 min followed by 0.1μg/kg/min for 48 hours) in addition to aspirin (325 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily), clopidogrel (300 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily) and enoxaparin (1 mg/kg S.C bid for 5 days). The group 2 patients received DAPT and enoxaparin only, in similar doses. Both the groups received antianginal therapy as appropriate and statins.
Results: The study showed the benefits of adding tirofiban to enoxaparin and DAPT irrespective of age, sex, presence or absence of diabetes and dyslipidemia, ECG changes, troponin positivity and TIMI score in patients with NSTE-ACS. There was a significant reduction {Risk reduction (RR) of 45.4% P <0.01} in composite of primary end points refractory ischemia myocardial infarction (MI) and death with Tirofiban. No major or minor bleeding episodes were seen in any patients.
Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that tirofiban in addition to DAPT and enoxaparin reduces the risk of refractory ischemia, MI and death in patients with NSTE-ACS without any additional risk of major or minor bleeding. Therefore, we advocate this regimen in patients with NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. Large randomized study is needed to recommend this regimen. |
topic |
Antiplatelet resistance GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors myocardial infarction non-ST elevation NSTE-ACS |
url |
http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Bhandari |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT monikabhandari acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT praveshvishwakarma acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT mukulmisra acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT varunshankarnarain acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT akshyayapradhan acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT rishisethi acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT monikabhandari comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT praveshvishwakarma comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT mukulmisra comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT varunshankarnarain comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT akshyayapradhan comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome AT rishisethi comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome |
_version_ |
1725800745160146944 |