A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome

Introduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectivel...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Monika Bhandari, Pravesh Vishwakarma, Mukul Misra, Varun Shankar Narain, Akshyaya Pradhan, Rishi Sethi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2018-01-01
Series:Heart India
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Bhandari
id doaj-edc1006bddb147428fd0d648524f9bb7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-edc1006bddb147428fd0d648524f9bb72020-11-24T22:13:30ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsHeart India2321-449X2018-01-01639710110.4103/heartindia.heartindia_32_18A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromeMonika BhandariPravesh VishwakarmaMukul MisraVarun Shankar NarainAkshyaya PradhanRishi SethiIntroduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectively. Hence the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor appears to be a reasonable option as they act on the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Though frequently used in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PC1), their use in patients not undergoing such procedure is not popular despite evidence in literature. Materials and Methods: This study was done on 44 patients of NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion in two groups. The patients in group 1 received tirofiban(0.4μg/kg/min i.v for 30 min followed by 0.1μg/kg/min for 48 hours) in addition to aspirin (325 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily), clopidogrel (300 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily) and enoxaparin (1 mg/kg S.C bid for 5 days). The group 2 patients received DAPT and enoxaparin only, in similar doses. Both the groups received antianginal therapy as appropriate and statins. Results: The study showed the benefits of adding tirofiban to enoxaparin and DAPT irrespective of age, sex, presence or absence of diabetes and dyslipidemia, ECG changes, troponin positivity and TIMI score in patients with NSTE-ACS. There was a significant reduction {Risk reduction (RR) of 45.4% P <0.01} in composite of primary end points refractory ischemia myocardial infarction (MI) and death with Tirofiban. No major or minor bleeding episodes were seen in any patients. Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that tirofiban in addition to DAPT and enoxaparin reduces the risk of refractory ischemia, MI and death in patients with NSTE-ACS without any additional risk of major or minor bleeding. Therefore, we advocate this regimen in patients with NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. Large randomized study is needed to recommend this regimen.http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=BhandariAntiplatelet resistanceGPIIb/IIIa inhibitorsmyocardial infarctionnon-ST elevation NSTE-ACS
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Monika Bhandari
Pravesh Vishwakarma
Mukul Misra
Varun Shankar Narain
Akshyaya Pradhan
Rishi Sethi
spellingShingle Monika Bhandari
Pravesh Vishwakarma
Mukul Misra
Varun Shankar Narain
Akshyaya Pradhan
Rishi Sethi
A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
Heart India
Antiplatelet resistance
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors
myocardial infarction
non-ST elevation NSTE-ACS
author_facet Monika Bhandari
Pravesh Vishwakarma
Mukul Misra
Varun Shankar Narain
Akshyaya Pradhan
Rishi Sethi
author_sort Monika Bhandari
title A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_short A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_full A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_fullStr A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome
title_sort comparative study of tirofiban plus enoxaparin versus enoxaparin alone along with dual antiplatelet blockade in the management of patients with non-st elevation acute coronary syndrome
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Heart India
issn 2321-449X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description Introduction: Antithrombotic therapy in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) includes dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) along with enoxaparin. However, resistance to antiplatelet action of aspirin and clopidogrel is well known and is about 27% (0-57%) and 30%, respectively. Hence the use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor appears to be a reasonable option as they act on the final common pathway of platelet aggregation. Though frequently used in patients undergoing percutaneous intervention (PC1), their use in patients not undergoing such procedure is not popular despite evidence in literature. Materials and Methods: This study was done on 44 patients of NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 fashion in two groups. The patients in group 1 received tirofiban(0.4μg/kg/min i.v for 30 min followed by 0.1μg/kg/min for 48 hours) in addition to aspirin (325 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily), clopidogrel (300 mg stat followed by 75 mg P.O. daily) and enoxaparin (1 mg/kg S.C bid for 5 days). The group 2 patients received DAPT and enoxaparin only, in similar doses. Both the groups received antianginal therapy as appropriate and statins. Results: The study showed the benefits of adding tirofiban to enoxaparin and DAPT irrespective of age, sex, presence or absence of diabetes and dyslipidemia, ECG changes, troponin positivity and TIMI score in patients with NSTE-ACS. There was a significant reduction {Risk reduction (RR) of 45.4% P <0.01} in composite of primary end points refractory ischemia myocardial infarction (MI) and death with Tirofiban. No major or minor bleeding episodes were seen in any patients. Conclusion: Thus, we conclude that tirofiban in addition to DAPT and enoxaparin reduces the risk of refractory ischemia, MI and death in patients with NSTE-ACS without any additional risk of major or minor bleeding. Therefore, we advocate this regimen in patients with NSTE-ACS managed conservatively. Large randomized study is needed to recommend this regimen.
topic Antiplatelet resistance
GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors
myocardial infarction
non-ST elevation NSTE-ACS
url http://www.heartindia.net/article.asp?issn=2321-449x;year=2018;volume=6;issue=3;spage=97;epage=101;aulast=Bhandari
work_keys_str_mv AT monikabhandari acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT praveshvishwakarma acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT mukulmisra acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT varunshankarnarain acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT akshyayapradhan acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT rishisethi acomparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT monikabhandari comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT praveshvishwakarma comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT mukulmisra comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT varunshankarnarain comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT akshyayapradhan comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
AT rishisethi comparativestudyoftirofibanplusenoxaparinversusenoxaparinalonealongwithdualantiplateletblockadeinthemanagementofpatientswithnonstelevationacutecoronarysyndrome
_version_ 1725800745160146944