Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
Tax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-09-01
|
Series: | Laws |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16 |
id |
doaj-edbb44f6f5a2480db5c5f91109db487a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-edbb44f6f5a2480db5c5f91109db487a2020-11-24T23:55:27ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2017-09-01641610.3390/laws6040016laws6040016Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of IndonesiaEmmiryzan Wasrinil Said0School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, Freeman Building, Brighton BN19QE, UKTax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty (‘tax amnesty policy’) is often controversial. The tax amnesty policy and resulting program offered by the Government of Indonesia has been criticized both because it is considered to be unfair and because it favors the perpetrators of tax evasion. In particular, the tax amnesty law offered special treatment to taxpayers who participated in the program, such as no checking of the source of funds, no checking of the financial statements reported by law enforcers, protection from punishment on the financial reports provided to the Director General of Taxation, and the requirement to pay only a small penalty. Tax amnesty programs also provide the potential for money laundering. This is certainly the case in Indonesia. In addition, tax amnesty programs weaken law enforcement in Indonesia; in particular, in the areas of corruption and money laundering. This is because law enforcement officers cannot investigate the perpetrators of white-collar crime that benefit from the tax amnesty program. Under the terms of the tax amnesty program, the financial data is not accessible by them.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16tax amnestymoney launderingIndonesiafinancial crime |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said |
spellingShingle |
Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia Laws tax amnesty money laundering Indonesia financial crime |
author_facet |
Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said |
author_sort |
Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said |
title |
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia |
title_short |
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia |
title_full |
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia |
title_fullStr |
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia |
title_full_unstemmed |
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia |
title_sort |
tax policy in action: 2016 tax amnesty experience of the republic of indonesia |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Laws |
issn |
2075-471X |
publishDate |
2017-09-01 |
description |
Tax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty (‘tax amnesty policy’) is often controversial. The tax amnesty policy and resulting program offered by the Government of Indonesia has been criticized both because it is considered to be unfair and because it favors the perpetrators of tax evasion. In particular, the tax amnesty law offered special treatment to taxpayers who participated in the program, such as no checking of the source of funds, no checking of the financial statements reported by law enforcers, protection from punishment on the financial reports provided to the Director General of Taxation, and the requirement to pay only a small penalty. Tax amnesty programs also provide the potential for money laundering. This is certainly the case in Indonesia. In addition, tax amnesty programs weaken law enforcement in Indonesia; in particular, in the areas of corruption and money laundering. This is because law enforcement officers cannot investigate the perpetrators of white-collar crime that benefit from the tax amnesty program. Under the terms of the tax amnesty program, the financial data is not accessible by them. |
topic |
tax amnesty money laundering Indonesia financial crime |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT emmiryzanwasrinilsaid taxpolicyinaction2016taxamnestyexperienceoftherepublicofindonesia |
_version_ |
1725462436990943232 |