Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia

Tax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2017-09-01
Series:Laws
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16
id doaj-edbb44f6f5a2480db5c5f91109db487a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-edbb44f6f5a2480db5c5f91109db487a2020-11-24T23:55:27ZengMDPI AGLaws2075-471X2017-09-01641610.3390/laws6040016laws6040016Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of IndonesiaEmmiryzan Wasrinil Said0School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex, Freeman Building, Brighton BN19QE, UKTax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty (‘tax amnesty policy’) is often controversial. The tax amnesty policy and resulting program offered by the Government of Indonesia has been criticized both because it is considered to be unfair and because it favors the perpetrators of tax evasion. In particular, the tax amnesty law offered special treatment to taxpayers who participated in the program, such as no checking of the source of funds, no checking of the financial statements reported by law enforcers, protection from punishment on the financial reports provided to the Director General of Taxation, and the requirement to pay only a small penalty. Tax amnesty programs also provide the potential for money laundering. This is certainly the case in Indonesia. In addition, tax amnesty programs weaken law enforcement in Indonesia; in particular, in the areas of corruption and money laundering. This is because law enforcement officers cannot investigate the perpetrators of white-collar crime that benefit from the tax amnesty program. Under the terms of the tax amnesty program, the financial data is not accessible by them.https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16tax amnestymoney launderingIndonesiafinancial crime
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said
spellingShingle Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said
Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
Laws
tax amnesty
money laundering
Indonesia
financial crime
author_facet Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said
author_sort Emmiryzan Wasrinil Said
title Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
title_short Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
title_full Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
title_fullStr Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Tax Policy in Action: 2016 Tax Amnesty Experience of the Republic of Indonesia
title_sort tax policy in action: 2016 tax amnesty experience of the republic of indonesia
publisher MDPI AG
series Laws
issn 2075-471X
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Tax amnesty programs are often used by governments to improve tax compliance and to increase tax revenue. However, the policy choice to provide a tax amnesty often results in adverse consequences, including the violation of other legal rules. For this reason, the policy choice to offer a tax amnesty (‘tax amnesty policy’) is often controversial. The tax amnesty policy and resulting program offered by the Government of Indonesia has been criticized both because it is considered to be unfair and because it favors the perpetrators of tax evasion. In particular, the tax amnesty law offered special treatment to taxpayers who participated in the program, such as no checking of the source of funds, no checking of the financial statements reported by law enforcers, protection from punishment on the financial reports provided to the Director General of Taxation, and the requirement to pay only a small penalty. Tax amnesty programs also provide the potential for money laundering. This is certainly the case in Indonesia. In addition, tax amnesty programs weaken law enforcement in Indonesia; in particular, in the areas of corruption and money laundering. This is because law enforcement officers cannot investigate the perpetrators of white-collar crime that benefit from the tax amnesty program. Under the terms of the tax amnesty program, the financial data is not accessible by them.
topic tax amnesty
money laundering
Indonesia
financial crime
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-471X/6/4/16
work_keys_str_mv AT emmiryzanwasrinilsaid taxpolicyinaction2016taxamnestyexperienceoftherepublicofindonesia
_version_ 1725462436990943232