Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"

The growth of the Internet presents challenges to knowledge transfer; such knowledge is formed contextually and dialogically, a negotiated discursive construct that is created between people. The editorial makes a case for book reviews and review essays which are auto-ethnographic, "performativ...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kip Jones
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: FQS 2006-03-01
Series:Forum: Qualitative Social Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/87
id doaj-ed84068b11e04e6e85cab6b7935001bd
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed84068b11e04e6e85cab6b7935001bd2020-11-24T23:09:46ZdeuFQS Forum: Qualitative Social Research1438-56272006-03-017286Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"Kip Jones0Bournemouth UniversityThe growth of the Internet presents challenges to knowledge transfer; such knowledge is formed contextually and dialogically, a negotiated discursive construct that is created between people. The editorial makes a case for book reviews and review essays which are auto-ethnographic, "performative" and critical. The shift to a more dialogic exploration of emergent knowledge through the book review as social discourse is discussed. The essence of qualitative research itself is explored as the bedrock of book reviews. Reviews are considered as polyvocal attempts at interfacing with cultural/relational/linguistic accounts of the real. A narrative approach to reporting on reviewed books is encouraged, permitting authors to reveal themselves in the relationships presented through their writing. A case is made that a phenomenological approach to writing reviews would be more interested in the person who writes than in the act of writing itself. It is through the creative representations of the reviewed book that reviewers can fashion their own individual Gestalt or worldview woven from the writing under review. The report itself mediates between researcher/writer and reviewer/reader. Such an approach opens up opportunities to write book reviews "performatively". Finally, reviewers are encouraged to create both a dialogue with the author under consideration as well as with their reader. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602270http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/87book review"performative social science"narrativeInternetknowledge constructionphenomenologycriticismdialogue
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kip Jones
spellingShingle Kip Jones
Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
Forum: Qualitative Social Research
book review
"performative social science"
narrative
Internet
knowledge construction
phenomenology
criticism
dialogue
author_facet Kip Jones
author_sort Kip Jones
title Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
title_short Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
title_full Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
title_fullStr Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
title_full_unstemmed Editorial Note: The Book Review as "Performance"
title_sort editorial note: the book review as "performance"
publisher FQS
series Forum: Qualitative Social Research
issn 1438-5627
publishDate 2006-03-01
description The growth of the Internet presents challenges to knowledge transfer; such knowledge is formed contextually and dialogically, a negotiated discursive construct that is created between people. The editorial makes a case for book reviews and review essays which are auto-ethnographic, "performative" and critical. The shift to a more dialogic exploration of emergent knowledge through the book review as social discourse is discussed. The essence of qualitative research itself is explored as the bedrock of book reviews. Reviews are considered as polyvocal attempts at interfacing with cultural/relational/linguistic accounts of the real. A narrative approach to reporting on reviewed books is encouraged, permitting authors to reveal themselves in the relationships presented through their writing. A case is made that a phenomenological approach to writing reviews would be more interested in the person who writes than in the act of writing itself. It is through the creative representations of the reviewed book that reviewers can fashion their own individual Gestalt or worldview woven from the writing under review. The report itself mediates between researcher/writer and reviewer/reader. Such an approach opens up opportunities to write book reviews "performatively". Finally, reviewers are encouraged to create both a dialogue with the author under consideration as well as with their reader. URN: urn:nbn:de:0114-fqs0602270
topic book review
"performative social science"
narrative
Internet
knowledge construction
phenomenology
criticism
dialogue
url http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/87
work_keys_str_mv AT kipjones editorialnotethebookreviewasperformance
_version_ 1725609525276311552