Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran

Since the Constitutional Revolution of 1906, successive regimes in Iran promoted competing conceptions of Iranian national identity. However, the policy of promoting nationalism as a state-sponsored ideology that excludes Iran’s ethnic and religious diversity remained unchanged. Competing discourses...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ozum Yesiltas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tallinn University 2016-07-01
Series:Studies of Transition States and Societies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/255/228
id doaj-ed58c52179644a259bd70a27d9f1dba4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed58c52179644a259bd70a27d9f1dba42020-11-24T21:17:01ZengTallinn University Studies of Transition States and Societies1736-87581736-87582016-07-01815368Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in IranOzum YesiltasSince the Constitutional Revolution of 1906, successive regimes in Iran promoted competing conceptions of Iranian national identity. However, the policy of promoting nationalism as a state-sponsored ideology that excludes Iran’s ethnic and religious diversity remained unchanged. Competing discourses around nation building and identity strikingly intersect with the struggle for democratization in Iran. Since the Islamic Revolution, the pro-democracy movement in the country takes place on two fronts: the confrontation between the conservatives and the reformists, and the challenge posed by the ethnic movements towards the official denial of the ethnic and religious diversity of Iran. This article argues that be they reformist or conservative, successive governments in Iran have refused to recognize the multi-ethnic structure of Iranian society and the legitimate rights of the ethnic groups. Therefore, a regime change would be unlikely to alter the social and political status of ethnic and religious minorities unless the ethnic movements and the pro-democracy opposition collaborate. Formation of a common discourse on the question of ‘Iranianness’ is the primary condition for this to be accomplished.http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/255/228national identityethnicitydemocratizationminority rights
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ozum Yesiltas
spellingShingle Ozum Yesiltas
Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
Studies of Transition States and Societies
national identity
ethnicity
democratization
minority rights
author_facet Ozum Yesiltas
author_sort Ozum Yesiltas
title Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
title_short Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
title_full Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
title_fullStr Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
title_full_unstemmed Contested Notions of National Identity, Ethnic Movements And Democratization in Iran
title_sort contested notions of national identity, ethnic movements and democratization in iran
publisher Tallinn University
series Studies of Transition States and Societies
issn 1736-8758
1736-8758
publishDate 2016-07-01
description Since the Constitutional Revolution of 1906, successive regimes in Iran promoted competing conceptions of Iranian national identity. However, the policy of promoting nationalism as a state-sponsored ideology that excludes Iran’s ethnic and religious diversity remained unchanged. Competing discourses around nation building and identity strikingly intersect with the struggle for democratization in Iran. Since the Islamic Revolution, the pro-democracy movement in the country takes place on two fronts: the confrontation between the conservatives and the reformists, and the challenge posed by the ethnic movements towards the official denial of the ethnic and religious diversity of Iran. This article argues that be they reformist or conservative, successive governments in Iran have refused to recognize the multi-ethnic structure of Iranian society and the legitimate rights of the ethnic groups. Therefore, a regime change would be unlikely to alter the social and political status of ethnic and religious minorities unless the ethnic movements and the pro-democracy opposition collaborate. Formation of a common discourse on the question of ‘Iranianness’ is the primary condition for this to be accomplished.
topic national identity
ethnicity
democratization
minority rights
url http://publications.tlu.ee/index.php/stss/article/view/255/228
work_keys_str_mv AT ozumyesiltas contestednotionsofnationalidentityethnicmovementsanddemocratizationiniran
_version_ 1726014674082725888