Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy

This study aimed to evaluate the progress in reduction of prevalence of anemia in rural Australia. It also investigates the prevalence of hypoviscosity in anaemia with a view to determine the fraction of anaemic patients at risk of drug-inducible exacerbation of anemia. Archived clinical pathology d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ezekiel Uba Nwose
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2012-01-01
Series:Anemia
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795439
id doaj-ed2d6a81a58147dd8e4b0dcb6f676aec
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed2d6a81a58147dd8e4b0dcb6f676aec2020-11-25T01:17:21ZengHindawi LimitedAnemia2090-12672090-12752012-01-01201210.1155/2012/795439795439Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for TherapyEzekiel Uba Nwose0Institute of Clinical Pathology & Medical Research, Nepean Hospital Pathology, Kingswood NSW 2747, AustraliaThis study aimed to evaluate the progress in reduction of prevalence of anemia in rural Australia. It also investigates the prevalence of hypoviscosity in anaemia with a view to determine the fraction of anaemic patients at risk of drug-inducible exacerbation of anemia. Archived clinical pathology data (𝑁=130,354) for the period of 1999 to 2008 were utilized. The prevalence of anemia and hypoviscosity was evaluated by working out (i) the number that fell within anemia definition as a percentage of the population and (ii) the number that fell within hypoviscosity definition as a percentage of anemic patients. The prevalence in anemic diabetes and dyslipidaemia was further determined. There was progressive reduction in anemia from 6.1% to 3.2% over the ten years period. Prevalence of anemia is statistically significantly higher in males than in females (𝑃<0.0001), but protein level is lower in anemic females than in anemic males (𝑃<0.01). The results further show that up to 75% of anemic patients may benefit from NSAID or salicylates. This paper highlights differences between genders. It suggests more concerted effort in men's health and speculates a new factor to investigate in women's health.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795439
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ezekiel Uba Nwose
spellingShingle Ezekiel Uba Nwose
Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
Anemia
author_facet Ezekiel Uba Nwose
author_sort Ezekiel Uba Nwose
title Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
title_short Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
title_full Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
title_fullStr Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of Anemia and Risk of Adverse Bleeding Effect of Drugs: Implication for Therapy
title_sort prevalence of anemia and risk of adverse bleeding effect of drugs: implication for therapy
publisher Hindawi Limited
series Anemia
issn 2090-1267
2090-1275
publishDate 2012-01-01
description This study aimed to evaluate the progress in reduction of prevalence of anemia in rural Australia. It also investigates the prevalence of hypoviscosity in anaemia with a view to determine the fraction of anaemic patients at risk of drug-inducible exacerbation of anemia. Archived clinical pathology data (𝑁=130,354) for the period of 1999 to 2008 were utilized. The prevalence of anemia and hypoviscosity was evaluated by working out (i) the number that fell within anemia definition as a percentage of the population and (ii) the number that fell within hypoviscosity definition as a percentage of anemic patients. The prevalence in anemic diabetes and dyslipidaemia was further determined. There was progressive reduction in anemia from 6.1% to 3.2% over the ten years period. Prevalence of anemia is statistically significantly higher in males than in females (𝑃<0.0001), but protein level is lower in anemic females than in anemic males (𝑃<0.01). The results further show that up to 75% of anemic patients may benefit from NSAID or salicylates. This paper highlights differences between genders. It suggests more concerted effort in men's health and speculates a new factor to investigate in women's health.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/795439
work_keys_str_mv AT ezekielubanwose prevalenceofanemiaandriskofadversebleedingeffectofdrugsimplicationfortherapy
_version_ 1725146390961586176