Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict

Climate change, combined with rising global demand for seafood products, will lead to greater conflict over remaining fisheries. Warming and acidifying oceans are shifting the availability of oxygen and nutrients that are necessary to maintain fish stocks. These changes are likely to increase confli...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Jonathan Kelman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Henley-Putnam University 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Strategic Security
Online Access:https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol13/iss4/7
id doaj-ed2a146ddaf84ab4b1b90a26e39d225b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed2a146ddaf84ab4b1b90a26e39d225b2020-12-11T20:16:42ZengHenley-Putnam UniversityJournal of Strategic Security1944-04641944-04722020-01-0113496108https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.13.4.1869Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery ConflictJonathan KelmanClimate change, combined with rising global demand for seafood products, will lead to greater conflict over remaining fisheries. Warming and acidifying oceans are shifting the availability of oxygen and nutrients that are necessary to maintain fish stocks. These changes are likely to increase conflict, both interstate and intrastate, in several important ways. For one, the fish stocks that are already under stress from demand for seafood protein are also shifting location. Most significantly, scarcity will likely draw in greater state involvement in fisheries. As traditional fleets exhaust their territorial waters, domestic political pressure will lead to greater state investment in distant water fishing (DWF) fleets to access fish stocks on the high seas and in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of other states. DWF fleets are destabilizing because they can easily access fishing zones with low levels of enforcement. Their industrial scale and low level of transparency means that they are also more likely to engage in Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing activities. States are also more likely to intervene militarily to protect their state-support DWF fleets.https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol13/iss4/7
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan Kelman
spellingShingle Jonathan Kelman
Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
Journal of Strategic Security
author_facet Jonathan Kelman
author_sort Jonathan Kelman
title Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
title_short Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
title_full Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
title_fullStr Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Why Climate Change and State Subsidies Will Collide to Create Fishery Conflict
title_sort why climate change and state subsidies will collide to create fishery conflict
publisher Henley-Putnam University
series Journal of Strategic Security
issn 1944-0464
1944-0472
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Climate change, combined with rising global demand for seafood products, will lead to greater conflict over remaining fisheries. Warming and acidifying oceans are shifting the availability of oxygen and nutrients that are necessary to maintain fish stocks. These changes are likely to increase conflict, both interstate and intrastate, in several important ways. For one, the fish stocks that are already under stress from demand for seafood protein are also shifting location. Most significantly, scarcity will likely draw in greater state involvement in fisheries. As traditional fleets exhaust their territorial waters, domestic political pressure will lead to greater state investment in distant water fishing (DWF) fleets to access fish stocks on the high seas and in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZs) of other states. DWF fleets are destabilizing because they can easily access fishing zones with low levels of enforcement. Their industrial scale and low level of transparency means that they are also more likely to engage in Illegal, Unreported, and Unregulated (IUU) fishing activities. States are also more likely to intervene militarily to protect their state-support DWF fleets.
url https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/jss/vol13/iss4/7
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathankelman whyclimatechangeandstatesubsidieswillcollidetocreatefisheryconflict
_version_ 1724386184866562048