RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population

This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal).After publication of this article, concerns were raised about the validity of the study design and conclusions reported. Following a post-public...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Serdar Gökay Terzioğlu, Ali Sapmaz, Murat Özgür Kılıç, Ahmet Serdar Karaca
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency and Critical Medicine (TSGECM) 2017-12-01
Series:International Journal of Gerontology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873959816301478
id doaj-ed21555dd7bc418fa38adf9efb6fb93c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed21555dd7bc418fa38adf9efb6fb93c2020-11-24T23:19:56ZengTaiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency and Critical Medicine (TSGECM)International Journal of Gerontology1873-95982017-12-01114235238RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric PopulationSerdar Gökay Terzioğlu0Ali Sapmaz1Murat Özgür Kılıç2Ahmet Serdar Karaca3Department of General Surgery, Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of General Surgery, Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of General Surgery, Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyDepartment of General Surgery, Numune Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, TurkeyThis article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal).After publication of this article, concerns were raised about the validity of the study design and conclusions reported. Following a post-publication assessment involving editor members of our Editorial Board, the International Journal of Gerontology Editors decided to retract this article due to the study design, methodology, and interpretation of the data, which the peer review process did not adequately address such that the results of the study were determined to be unreliable. Issues include:1. The study had no IRB approval and informed consent from patients.2. The authors did not report a power calculation to support the sample size and demonstrate it was adequate to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.3. Further concerns were raised about the statistical analysis methods and reporting: the authors did not report a statistical analysis plan and methodology clearly in their Methods section. The authors did not state how to choose variables to adjust in the multivariate analysis. In the statistics analysis section and tables, the authors did not list the variables which have been adjusted for. It makes the results difficult to interpret.4. In Table 2 the authors incorrectly interpreted the results by considering that OR<1 for the association between post-operative operation and prolonged hospitalization in the text.5. The data in the table 1 and table 2 are inconsistent, for example, it is stated in table 1 that elder patients had longer hospital stay. But in table 2, elder patients were associated with short hospital stay.In light of the above concerns about the study design and methods used, the International Journal of Gerontology Editors consider that the conclusions of this study are not supported by the data presented and retract this article.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873959816301478
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Serdar Gökay Terzioğlu
Ali Sapmaz
Murat Özgür Kılıç
Ahmet Serdar Karaca
spellingShingle Serdar Gökay Terzioğlu
Ali Sapmaz
Murat Özgür Kılıç
Ahmet Serdar Karaca
RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
International Journal of Gerontology
author_facet Serdar Gökay Terzioğlu
Ali Sapmaz
Murat Özgür Kılıç
Ahmet Serdar Karaca
author_sort Serdar Gökay Terzioğlu
title RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
title_short RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
title_full RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
title_fullStr RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
title_full_unstemmed RETRACTED: Outcomes of Laparoscopic Cholecysectomy in Geriatric Population
title_sort retracted: outcomes of laparoscopic cholecysectomy in geriatric population
publisher Taiwan Society of Geriatric Emergency and Critical Medicine (TSGECM)
series International Journal of Gerontology
issn 1873-9598
publishDate 2017-12-01
description This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (https://www.elsevier.com/about/our-business/policies/article-withdrawal).After publication of this article, concerns were raised about the validity of the study design and conclusions reported. Following a post-publication assessment involving editor members of our Editorial Board, the International Journal of Gerontology Editors decided to retract this article due to the study design, methodology, and interpretation of the data, which the peer review process did not adequately address such that the results of the study were determined to be unreliable. Issues include:1. The study had no IRB approval and informed consent from patients.2. The authors did not report a power calculation to support the sample size and demonstrate it was adequate to assess the outcomes of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.3. Further concerns were raised about the statistical analysis methods and reporting: the authors did not report a statistical analysis plan and methodology clearly in their Methods section. The authors did not state how to choose variables to adjust in the multivariate analysis. In the statistics analysis section and tables, the authors did not list the variables which have been adjusted for. It makes the results difficult to interpret.4. In Table 2 the authors incorrectly interpreted the results by considering that OR<1 for the association between post-operative operation and prolonged hospitalization in the text.5. The data in the table 1 and table 2 are inconsistent, for example, it is stated in table 1 that elder patients had longer hospital stay. But in table 2, elder patients were associated with short hospital stay.In light of the above concerns about the study design and methods used, the International Journal of Gerontology Editors consider that the conclusions of this study are not supported by the data presented and retract this article.
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1873959816301478
work_keys_str_mv AT serdargokayterzioglu retractedoutcomesoflaparoscopiccholecysectomyingeriatricpopulation
AT alisapmaz retractedoutcomesoflaparoscopiccholecysectomyingeriatricpopulation
AT muratozgurkılıc retractedoutcomesoflaparoscopiccholecysectomyingeriatricpopulation
AT ahmetserdarkaraca retractedoutcomesoflaparoscopiccholecysectomyingeriatricpopulation
_version_ 1725576183307829248