CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim wa...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Watts Sarah, Mackenzie Anna, Thomas Cherian, Griskaitis Al, Mewton Louise, Williams Alishia, Andrews Gavin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2013-02-01
Series:BMC Psychiatry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/49
id doaj-ed20e2c58bb1406e81f5255794ae62df
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed20e2c58bb1406e81f5255794ae62df2020-11-25T00:16:50ZengBMCBMC Psychiatry1471-244X2013-02-011314910.1186/1471-244X-13-49CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computerWatts SarahMackenzie AnnaThomas CherianGriskaitis AlMewton LouiseWilliams AlishiaAndrews Gavin<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954</p> http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/49Cognitive behavioural therapyMajor depressive disorderMobile appInternet treatmentTreatment
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Watts Sarah
Mackenzie Anna
Thomas Cherian
Griskaitis Al
Mewton Louise
Williams Alishia
Andrews Gavin
spellingShingle Watts Sarah
Mackenzie Anna
Thomas Cherian
Griskaitis Al
Mewton Louise
Williams Alishia
Andrews Gavin
CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
BMC Psychiatry
Cognitive behavioural therapy
Major depressive disorder
Mobile app
Internet treatment
Treatment
author_facet Watts Sarah
Mackenzie Anna
Thomas Cherian
Griskaitis Al
Mewton Louise
Williams Alishia
Andrews Gavin
author_sort Watts Sarah
title CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_short CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_full CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_fullStr CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_full_unstemmed CBT for depression: a pilot RCT comparing mobile phone vs. computer
title_sort cbt for depression: a pilot rct comparing mobile phone vs. computer
publisher BMC
series BMC Psychiatry
issn 1471-244X
publishDate 2013-02-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>This paper reports the results of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the delivery modality (mobile phone/tablet or fixed computer) of a cognitive behavioural therapy intervention for the treatment of depression. The aim was to establish whether a previously validated computerized program (The Sadness Program) remained efficacious when delivered via a mobile application.</p> <p>Method</p> <p>35 participants were recruited with Major Depression (80% female) and randomly allocated to access the program using a mobile app (on either a mobile phone or iPad) or a computer. Participants completed 6 lessons, weekly homework assignments, and received weekly email contact from a clinical psychologist or psychiatrist until completion of lesson 2. After lesson 2 email contact was only provided in response to participant request, or in response to a deterioration in psychological distress scores. The primary outcome measure was the Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9). Of the 35 participants recruited, 68.6% completed 6 lessons and 65.7% completed the 3-months follow up. Attrition was handled using mixed-model repeated-measures ANOVA.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Both the Mobile and Computer Groups were associated with statistically significantly benefits in the PHQ-9 at post-test. At 3 months follow up, the reduction seen for both groups remained significant.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>These results provide evidence to indicate that delivering a CBT program using a mobile application, can result in clinically significant improvements in outcomes for patients with depression.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN 12611001257954</p>
topic Cognitive behavioural therapy
Major depressive disorder
Mobile app
Internet treatment
Treatment
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-244X/13/49
work_keys_str_mv AT wattssarah cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT mackenzieanna cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT thomascherian cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT griskaitisal cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT mewtonlouise cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT williamsalishia cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
AT andrewsgavin cbtfordepressionapilotrctcomparingmobilephonevscomputer
_version_ 1725382233175359488