The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Metacognitive therapy (MCT) continues to gain increased ground as a treatment for psychological complaints. During the last years, several clinical trials on the efficacy of MCT have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an updated meta-analytic review of the effect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nicoline Normann, Nexhmedin Morina
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2018-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02211/full
id doaj-ed1927c709de419aa8bca74103b076af
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ed1927c709de419aa8bca74103b076af2020-11-25T02:50:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782018-11-01910.3389/fpsyg.2018.02211412665The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-AnalysisNicoline Normann0Nexhmedin Morina1Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, University of Münster, Münster, GermanyBackground: Metacognitive therapy (MCT) continues to gain increased ground as a treatment for psychological complaints. During the last years, several clinical trials on the efficacy of MCT have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an updated meta-analytic review of the effect of MCT for psychological complaints.Methods: We conducted a systematic search of trials on MCT for young and adult patients with psychological complaints published until January 2018, using PsycINFO, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Trials with a minimum of 10 participants in the MCT condition were included.Results: A total of 25 studies that examined a variety of psychological complaints met our inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials. We identified only one trial that was conducted with children and adolescents. In trials with adult patients, large uncontrolled effect size estimates from pre- to post-treatment and follow-up suggest that MCT is effective at reducing symptoms of the targeted primary complaints, anxiety, depression, and dysfunctional metacognitions. The comparison with waitlist control conditions also resulted in a large effect (Hedges' g = 2.06). The comparison of MCT to cognitive and behavioral interventions at post-treatment and at follow-up showed pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) of 0.69 and 0.37 at post-treatment (k = 8) and follow-up (k = 7), respectively.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that MCT is an effective treatment for a range of psychological complaints. To date, strongest evidence exists for anxiety and depression. Current results suggest that MCT may be superior to other psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioral interventions. However, more trials with larger number of participants are needed in order to draw firm conclusions.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02211/fullmetacognitive therapymeta-analysispsychotherapyanxietydepressionpsychopathology
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Nicoline Normann
Nexhmedin Morina
spellingShingle Nicoline Normann
Nexhmedin Morina
The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Frontiers in Psychology
metacognitive therapy
meta-analysis
psychotherapy
anxiety
depression
psychopathology
author_facet Nicoline Normann
Nexhmedin Morina
author_sort Nicoline Normann
title The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Efficacy of Metacognitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort efficacy of metacognitive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Psychology
issn 1664-1078
publishDate 2018-11-01
description Background: Metacognitive therapy (MCT) continues to gain increased ground as a treatment for psychological complaints. During the last years, several clinical trials on the efficacy of MCT have been published. The aim of the current study was to provide an updated meta-analytic review of the effect of MCT for psychological complaints.Methods: We conducted a systematic search of trials on MCT for young and adult patients with psychological complaints published until January 2018, using PsycINFO, PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar. Trials with a minimum of 10 participants in the MCT condition were included.Results: A total of 25 studies that examined a variety of psychological complaints met our inclusion criteria, of which 15 were randomized controlled trials. We identified only one trial that was conducted with children and adolescents. In trials with adult patients, large uncontrolled effect size estimates from pre- to post-treatment and follow-up suggest that MCT is effective at reducing symptoms of the targeted primary complaints, anxiety, depression, and dysfunctional metacognitions. The comparison with waitlist control conditions also resulted in a large effect (Hedges' g = 2.06). The comparison of MCT to cognitive and behavioral interventions at post-treatment and at follow-up showed pooled effect sizes (Hedges' g) of 0.69 and 0.37 at post-treatment (k = 8) and follow-up (k = 7), respectively.Conclusions: Our findings indicate that MCT is an effective treatment for a range of psychological complaints. To date, strongest evidence exists for anxiety and depression. Current results suggest that MCT may be superior to other psychotherapies, including cognitive behavioral interventions. However, more trials with larger number of participants are needed in order to draw firm conclusions.
topic metacognitive therapy
meta-analysis
psychotherapy
anxiety
depression
psychopathology
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02211/full
work_keys_str_mv AT nicolinenormann theefficacyofmetacognitivetherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nexhmedinmorina theefficacyofmetacognitivetherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nicolinenormann efficacyofmetacognitivetherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT nexhmedinmorina efficacyofmetacognitivetherapyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
_version_ 1724740017134239744