Differences in left ventricular ejection fraction using teichholz formula and volumetric methods by cmr: implications for patient stratification and selection of therapy
Main Authors: | Manning Warren J, Rofsky Neil M, Dinwoodey Danya L, Ryan Jason W, Piazza Gregory, Morss Alexander M, Arora Garima, Chuang Michael L |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2010-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
Similar Items
-
Left Ventricular Volume in Bovines: The Correlation between Teichholz’s Medical Mathematical Method and the Volume of the Truncated Prolate Spheroid
by: José Sérgio Domingues, et al.
Published: (2018-09-01) -
Risk stratification by CMR in Chagas' disease
by: Uellendahl Marly M
Published: (2011-02-01) -
Automated segmentation of routine cine-CMR for volumetric assessment of presence and severity of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction
by: Min James K, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Dilated cardiomyopathy risk stratification; the vital role of CMR
by: Biederman Robert W, et al.
Published: (2010-01-01) -
Going beyond ejection fraction - CMR assessment of ventricular-vascular coupling and LV remodeling predicts diastolic dysfunction in advanced ischemic cardiomyopathy
by: Cavalcante Joao L, et al.
Published: (2013-01-01)