Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction
Microbiome composition profiles generated from 16S rRNA sequencing have been extensively studied for their usefulness in phenotype trait prediction, including for complex diseases such as diabetes and obesity. These microbiome compositions have typically been quantified in the form of Operational Ta...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020-12-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.610845/full |
id |
doaj-ecfa8f06a7794a2b8128ef06cab5a628 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ecfa8f06a7794a2b8128ef06cab5a6282020-12-16T05:21:48ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences2296-889X2020-12-01710.3389/fmolb.2020.610845610845Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease PredictionKuncheng Song0Fred A. Wright1Yi-Hui Zhou2Bioinformatics Research Center, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartments of Statistics and Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesDepartment of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, United StatesMicrobiome composition profiles generated from 16S rRNA sequencing have been extensively studied for their usefulness in phenotype trait prediction, including for complex diseases such as diabetes and obesity. These microbiome compositions have typically been quantified in the form of Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) count matrices. However, alternate approaches such as Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASV) have been used, as well as the direct use of k-mer sequence counts. The overall effect of these different types of predictors when used in concert with various machine learning methods has been difficult to assess, due to varied combinations described in the literature. Here we provide an in-depth investigation of more than 1,000 combinations of these three clustering/counting methods, in combination with varied choices for normalization and filtering, grouping at various taxonomic levels, and the use of more than ten commonly used machine learning methods for phenotype prediction. The use of short k-mers, which have computational advantages and conceptual simplicity, is shown to be effective as a source for microbiome-based prediction. Among machine-learning approaches, tree-based methods show consistent, though modest, advantages in prediction accuracy. We describe the various advantages and disadvantages of combinations in analysis approaches, and provide general observations to serve as a useful guide for future trait-prediction explorations using microbiome data.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.610845/fullphenotype predictionmachine learning methodk-mersoperational taxonomic unit (OTU)amplicon sequence variant (ASV)phylogenetic analysis |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kuncheng Song Fred A. Wright Yi-Hui Zhou |
spellingShingle |
Kuncheng Song Fred A. Wright Yi-Hui Zhou Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences phenotype prediction machine learning method k-mers operational taxonomic unit (OTU) amplicon sequence variant (ASV) phylogenetic analysis |
author_facet |
Kuncheng Song Fred A. Wright Yi-Hui Zhou |
author_sort |
Kuncheng Song |
title |
Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction |
title_short |
Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction |
title_full |
Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction |
title_fullStr |
Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction |
title_full_unstemmed |
Systematic Comparisons for Composition Profiles, Taxonomic Levels, and Machine Learning Methods for Microbiome-Based Disease Prediction |
title_sort |
systematic comparisons for composition profiles, taxonomic levels, and machine learning methods for microbiome-based disease prediction |
publisher |
Frontiers Media S.A. |
series |
Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences |
issn |
2296-889X |
publishDate |
2020-12-01 |
description |
Microbiome composition profiles generated from 16S rRNA sequencing have been extensively studied for their usefulness in phenotype trait prediction, including for complex diseases such as diabetes and obesity. These microbiome compositions have typically been quantified in the form of Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) count matrices. However, alternate approaches such as Amplicon Sequence Variants (ASV) have been used, as well as the direct use of k-mer sequence counts. The overall effect of these different types of predictors when used in concert with various machine learning methods has been difficult to assess, due to varied combinations described in the literature. Here we provide an in-depth investigation of more than 1,000 combinations of these three clustering/counting methods, in combination with varied choices for normalization and filtering, grouping at various taxonomic levels, and the use of more than ten commonly used machine learning methods for phenotype prediction. The use of short k-mers, which have computational advantages and conceptual simplicity, is shown to be effective as a source for microbiome-based prediction. Among machine-learning approaches, tree-based methods show consistent, though modest, advantages in prediction accuracy. We describe the various advantages and disadvantages of combinations in analysis approaches, and provide general observations to serve as a useful guide for future trait-prediction explorations using microbiome data. |
topic |
phenotype prediction machine learning method k-mers operational taxonomic unit (OTU) amplicon sequence variant (ASV) phylogenetic analysis |
url |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fmolb.2020.610845/full |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT kunchengsong systematiccomparisonsforcompositionprofilestaxonomiclevelsandmachinelearningmethodsformicrobiomebaseddiseaseprediction AT fredawright systematiccomparisonsforcompositionprofilestaxonomiclevelsandmachinelearningmethodsformicrobiomebaseddiseaseprediction AT yihuizhou systematiccomparisonsforcompositionprofilestaxonomiclevelsandmachinelearningmethodsformicrobiomebaseddiseaseprediction |
_version_ |
1724381811458441216 |