Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments

For ecosystem measurement frameworks to be accepted, operationalised and implemented by diverse international communities, clear and agreeable concepts and classifications are essential. This paper analyses and develops two foundational typology challenges within ecosystem measurement: the classi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Bordt, Marc Saner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2019-02-01
Series:One Ecosystem
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/download/pdf/
id doaj-ecf2ed2a5f22464cb5ec0220e85a44b4
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ecf2ed2a5f22464cb5ec0220e85a44b42020-11-24T22:00:50ZengPensoft PublishersOne Ecosystem2367-81942019-02-01413310.3897/oneeco.4.e3142031420Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessmentsMichael Bordt0Marc Saner1University of OttawaUniversity of Ottawa For ecosystem measurement frameworks to be accepted, operationalised and implemented by diverse international communities, clear and agreeable concepts and classifications are essential. This paper analyses and develops two foundational typology challenges within ecosystem measurement: the classification of ecosystems and the classification of their services. Our aim is to determine if there is sufficient consensus to ascertain “Which ecosystems provide which services?” for standardised ecosystem accounting. This paper first compares classifications used in nine selected ecosystem assessments as input studies that make value statements about multiple ecosystems providing multiple ecosystem services. Given that these nine studies do not use identical concepts, classifications and terminologies, we develop “supersets” that can accommodate the diversity of classifications used in these input studies. Each input study is then corresponded to these new supersets. On the basis of this analysis, substantial consensus was found that some ecosystems are more likely to provide certain services than others are. However, for several ecosystem types, there was little or no consensus on which services they provide. Linkages for which there is consensus can serve as a checklist for future ecosystem services assessments. Both the framework of the supersets and the correspondence and visual methods developed will be useful for integrating information at different scales (for example, linkages from local, ecosystem-specific and ecosystem services-specific studies). This paper also provides guidance to future ecosystem services assessments to use, test and extend the current classifications of ecosystems and ecosystem services. https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/download/pdf/ClassificationConvergenceEnvironmental acco
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Michael Bordt
Marc Saner
spellingShingle Michael Bordt
Marc Saner
Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
One Ecosystem
Classification
Convergence
Environmental acco
author_facet Michael Bordt
Marc Saner
author_sort Michael Bordt
title Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
title_short Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
title_full Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
title_fullStr Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
title_full_unstemmed Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
title_sort which ecosystems provide which services? a meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments
publisher Pensoft Publishers
series One Ecosystem
issn 2367-8194
publishDate 2019-02-01
description For ecosystem measurement frameworks to be accepted, operationalised and implemented by diverse international communities, clear and agreeable concepts and classifications are essential. This paper analyses and develops two foundational typology challenges within ecosystem measurement: the classification of ecosystems and the classification of their services. Our aim is to determine if there is sufficient consensus to ascertain “Which ecosystems provide which services?” for standardised ecosystem accounting. This paper first compares classifications used in nine selected ecosystem assessments as input studies that make value statements about multiple ecosystems providing multiple ecosystem services. Given that these nine studies do not use identical concepts, classifications and terminologies, we develop “supersets” that can accommodate the diversity of classifications used in these input studies. Each input study is then corresponded to these new supersets. On the basis of this analysis, substantial consensus was found that some ecosystems are more likely to provide certain services than others are. However, for several ecosystem types, there was little or no consensus on which services they provide. Linkages for which there is consensus can serve as a checklist for future ecosystem services assessments. Both the framework of the supersets and the correspondence and visual methods developed will be useful for integrating information at different scales (for example, linkages from local, ecosystem-specific and ecosystem services-specific studies). This paper also provides guidance to future ecosystem services assessments to use, test and extend the current classifications of ecosystems and ecosystem services.
topic Classification
Convergence
Environmental acco
url https://oneecosystem.pensoft.net/article/31420/download/pdf/
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelbordt whichecosystemsprovidewhichservicesametaanalysisofnineselectedecosystemservicesassessments
AT marcsaner whichecosystemsprovidewhichservicesametaanalysisofnineselectedecosystemservicesassessments
_version_ 1725842549578399744