Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber

This master’s degree dissertation uses the philosophical schema of Ken Wilber, known as the integral model, and the Spiral Dynamics® approach based on psychologist Clare Graves’ work and promoted by Don Beck and Christopher Cowan, to explore the work of peace scholar-practitioners, John Burton and J...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Henry Lebovic
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: ARINA, Inc. 2013-02-01
Series:Integral Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_9_no_1_lebovic_towards_a_coherent_unity_of_perspectives_on_peace.pdf
id doaj-ece85a8378da49adbb3dbbbefd8dd0f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ece85a8378da49adbb3dbbbefd8dd0f02020-11-24T23:20:21ZdeuARINA, Inc.Integral Review1553-30691553-30692013-02-0191333Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken WilberHenry LebovicThis master’s degree dissertation uses the philosophical schema of Ken Wilber, known as the integral model, and the Spiral Dynamics® approach based on psychologist Clare Graves’ work and promoted by Don Beck and Christopher Cowan, to explore the work of peace scholar-practitioners, John Burton and John Paul Lederach. It asks: Can the Integral model and Spiral Dynamics be utilised in analyses to explore the causes and sources of conflict, and the limitations of peace theory and practice? If so, can these schemas be used prescriptively to help design more effective approaches to peacebuilding? Such an analytical schema reveals that Burton’s human needs theory makes claims to holism that ultimately fell short, primarily because of the reduction of culture to behaviour. In addition, his reliance on cognitive approaches and the aspect of assumed neutrality were found to be problematic. In contrast, Lederach’s concern with subjective causes and solutions of conflict was closer to the “integral holism” Wilber advocates. Lederach’s values, which were made more explicit than Burton’s, were also found to be congruent with the second-tier value approach of Spiral Dynamics. Furthermore, research within the peace studies literature, as demonstrated here, lends support to the experimental analyses conducted in this dissertation. Finally, the small body of “integrally-aware” peace scholarship, which is also reviewed, illustrates how integral theory might emerge as an important tool for analysing and shaping future peacebuilding initiatives.http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_9_no_1_lebovic_towards_a_coherent_unity_of_perspectives_on_peace.pdfSpiral DynamicsConflict resolutionconflict transformationhuman needs theoryJohn W. BurtonJohn Paul LederachpeacebuildingHenry Lebovic
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Henry Lebovic
spellingShingle Henry Lebovic
Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
Integral Review
Spiral Dynamics
Conflict resolution
conflict transformation
human needs theory
John W. Burton
John Paul Lederach
peacebuilding
Henry Lebovic
author_facet Henry Lebovic
author_sort Henry Lebovic
title Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
title_short Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
title_full Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
title_fullStr Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
title_full_unstemmed Towards a Coherent Unity of Perspectives on Peace: Burton, Lederach and the Philosophy of Ken Wilber
title_sort towards a coherent unity of perspectives on peace: burton, lederach and the philosophy of ken wilber
publisher ARINA, Inc.
series Integral Review
issn 1553-3069
1553-3069
publishDate 2013-02-01
description This master’s degree dissertation uses the philosophical schema of Ken Wilber, known as the integral model, and the Spiral Dynamics® approach based on psychologist Clare Graves’ work and promoted by Don Beck and Christopher Cowan, to explore the work of peace scholar-practitioners, John Burton and John Paul Lederach. It asks: Can the Integral model and Spiral Dynamics be utilised in analyses to explore the causes and sources of conflict, and the limitations of peace theory and practice? If so, can these schemas be used prescriptively to help design more effective approaches to peacebuilding? Such an analytical schema reveals that Burton’s human needs theory makes claims to holism that ultimately fell short, primarily because of the reduction of culture to behaviour. In addition, his reliance on cognitive approaches and the aspect of assumed neutrality were found to be problematic. In contrast, Lederach’s concern with subjective causes and solutions of conflict was closer to the “integral holism” Wilber advocates. Lederach’s values, which were made more explicit than Burton’s, were also found to be congruent with the second-tier value approach of Spiral Dynamics. Furthermore, research within the peace studies literature, as demonstrated here, lends support to the experimental analyses conducted in this dissertation. Finally, the small body of “integrally-aware” peace scholarship, which is also reviewed, illustrates how integral theory might emerge as an important tool for analysing and shaping future peacebuilding initiatives.
topic Spiral Dynamics
Conflict resolution
conflict transformation
human needs theory
John W. Burton
John Paul Lederach
peacebuilding
Henry Lebovic
url http://integral-review.org/pdf-template-issue.php?pdfName=vol_9_no_1_lebovic_towards_a_coherent_unity_of_perspectives_on_peace.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT henrylebovic towardsacoherentunityofperspectivesonpeaceburtonlederachandthephilosophyofkenwilber
_version_ 1725575325208805376