Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems

Abstract There is an urgent need to understand ecological responses of avian species to the rapidly expanding human footprint of conventional and renewable energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems. The ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) are two sympat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: John R. Squires, Lucretia E. Olson, Zachary P. Wallace, Robert J. Oakleaf, Patricia L. Kennedy
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2020-08-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3204
id doaj-ece7b74e2fca4b1d9c4954eb0bc84980
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ece7b74e2fca4b1d9c4954eb0bc849802020-11-25T03:50:16ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252020-08-01118n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3204Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystemsJohn R. Squires0Lucretia E. Olson1Zachary P. Wallace2Robert J. Oakleaf3Patricia L. Kennedy4Forestry Science Lab Rocky Mountain Research Station Missoula Montana59801USAForestry Science Lab Rocky Mountain Research Station Missoula Montana59801USAWyoming Natural Diversity Database University of Wyoming Laramie Wyoming82071USAWyoming Game and Fish Department Lander Wyoming82520USADepartment of Fisheries and Wildlife and Eastern Oregon Agriculture Research Center Oregon State University Union Oregon97883USAAbstract There is an urgent need to understand ecological responses of avian species to the rapidly expanding human footprint of conventional and renewable energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems. The ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) are two sympatric raptors of conservation concern that occupy and flourish in the most intact sagebrush steppe region remaining in North America. To understand these species’ use of habitat relative to energy development, we built resource selection functions using a spatially representative sample of occupied nesting territories collected in 2010–2011 and remotely sensed environmental variables across an extensive study area (186,693 km2). We used the resulting predicted resource selection maps to evaluate spatial overlap between the nesting habitats of these sympatric raptor species, as well as overlap of predicted habitat with potential development of oil/gas and wind energy resources. Remotely sensed variables were very effective in modeling patterns of nest‐site selection based on fivefold cross‐validation (>0.93 Spearman‐rank correlation) and validation with an independent dataset of historical nests collected from 2000 to 2009. Topographic roughness and intermediate levels of spring precipitation were the strongest drivers of differences in habitat use between ferruginous hawks and golden eagles. We did not detect a strong signal of avoidance of energy infrastructure by either species at current levels of development and both nested closer than expected to gravel/dirt roads associated with oil and gas infrastructure. However, extensive overlap of nesting habitat more selected by ferruginous hawks and golden eagles with areas of actual and potential energy development suggests both species are at risk from future habitat fragmentation. Given that 80% of nests are> 1 km from oil/gas wells, we believe the density of energy‐related disturbance present during our study was insufficient to drive patterns of resource selection for ferruginous hawks when considered at broad spatial scales. However, it was beyond the scope of our study to predict long‐term, population‐level responses. We suggest rigorous monitoring of long‐term trends in occupancy, productivity, and distribution is warranted for populations of ferruginous hawk and golden eagle in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems exposed to increased energy development.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3204artificial nest structureAquila chrysaetosButeo regalisenergy developmentferruginous hawkgolden eagle
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author John R. Squires
Lucretia E. Olson
Zachary P. Wallace
Robert J. Oakleaf
Patricia L. Kennedy
spellingShingle John R. Squires
Lucretia E. Olson
Zachary P. Wallace
Robert J. Oakleaf
Patricia L. Kennedy
Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
Ecosphere
artificial nest structure
Aquila chrysaetos
Buteo regalis
energy development
ferruginous hawk
golden eagle
author_facet John R. Squires
Lucretia E. Olson
Zachary P. Wallace
Robert J. Oakleaf
Patricia L. Kennedy
author_sort John R. Squires
title Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
title_short Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
title_full Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
title_fullStr Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
title_full_unstemmed Resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
title_sort resource selection of apex raptors: implications for siting energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2020-08-01
description Abstract There is an urgent need to understand ecological responses of avian species to the rapidly expanding human footprint of conventional and renewable energy development in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems. The ferruginous hawk (Buteo regalis) and golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos) are two sympatric raptors of conservation concern that occupy and flourish in the most intact sagebrush steppe region remaining in North America. To understand these species’ use of habitat relative to energy development, we built resource selection functions using a spatially representative sample of occupied nesting territories collected in 2010–2011 and remotely sensed environmental variables across an extensive study area (186,693 km2). We used the resulting predicted resource selection maps to evaluate spatial overlap between the nesting habitats of these sympatric raptor species, as well as overlap of predicted habitat with potential development of oil/gas and wind energy resources. Remotely sensed variables were very effective in modeling patterns of nest‐site selection based on fivefold cross‐validation (>0.93 Spearman‐rank correlation) and validation with an independent dataset of historical nests collected from 2000 to 2009. Topographic roughness and intermediate levels of spring precipitation were the strongest drivers of differences in habitat use between ferruginous hawks and golden eagles. We did not detect a strong signal of avoidance of energy infrastructure by either species at current levels of development and both nested closer than expected to gravel/dirt roads associated with oil and gas infrastructure. However, extensive overlap of nesting habitat more selected by ferruginous hawks and golden eagles with areas of actual and potential energy development suggests both species are at risk from future habitat fragmentation. Given that 80% of nests are> 1 km from oil/gas wells, we believe the density of energy‐related disturbance present during our study was insufficient to drive patterns of resource selection for ferruginous hawks when considered at broad spatial scales. However, it was beyond the scope of our study to predict long‐term, population‐level responses. We suggest rigorous monitoring of long‐term trends in occupancy, productivity, and distribution is warranted for populations of ferruginous hawk and golden eagle in sagebrush and prairie ecosystems exposed to increased energy development.
topic artificial nest structure
Aquila chrysaetos
Buteo regalis
energy development
ferruginous hawk
golden eagle
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3204
work_keys_str_mv AT johnrsquires resourceselectionofapexraptorsimplicationsforsitingenergydevelopmentinsagebrushandprairieecosystems
AT lucretiaeolson resourceselectionofapexraptorsimplicationsforsitingenergydevelopmentinsagebrushandprairieecosystems
AT zacharypwallace resourceselectionofapexraptorsimplicationsforsitingenergydevelopmentinsagebrushandprairieecosystems
AT robertjoakleaf resourceselectionofapexraptorsimplicationsforsitingenergydevelopmentinsagebrushandprairieecosystems
AT patricialkennedy resourceselectionofapexraptorsimplicationsforsitingenergydevelopmentinsagebrushandprairieecosystems
_version_ 1724491289334906880