Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem

This review summarizes published literature from a range of reputable sources regarding hip prostheses (stems) utilized currently in cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. The critical review of published clinical studies shows Zweymuller style (Alloclassic and SL-Plus) stems in all critical characteris...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Christian Wright, BS, Dale Lambert, BS, Declan Brazil, PhD, Kristaps Keggi, MD, John Keggi, MD, Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation 2011-10-01
Series:Reconstructive Review
Online Access:https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/5
id doaj-ecb4f013143b43408e49ecb617773141
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ecb4f013143b43408e49ecb6177731412020-11-25T00:44:19ZengJoint Implant Surgery & Research FoundationReconstructive Review2331-22622331-22702011-10-011110.15438/rr.v1i1.5Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral StemChristian Wright, BSDale Lambert, BSDeclan Brazil, PhDKristaps Keggi, MDJohn Keggi, MDTimothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)This review summarizes published literature from a range of reputable sources regarding hip prostheses (stems) utilized currently in cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. The critical review of published clinical studies shows Zweymuller style (Alloclassic and SL-Plus) stems in all critical characteristics. Since the introduction of cementless total hip arthroplasty in the 1970s, a range of design philosophies for femoral and acetabular components have demonstrated variable clinical success1,3. Recently cementless components have been yielding clinical results on par and in some cases even surpassing their cemented predecessors2,4,6. As a result, cementless THA is gaining in popularity1,7.  The short-term results of four of the best cementless femoral components recorded in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register as described by Havelin et al, included the Corail, lMT, Profile and Zweymuller stems with revision for loosening <1% at 4.5 years which was comparable to cemented counterparts. https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/5
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Christian Wright, BS
Dale Lambert, BS
Declan Brazil, PhD
Kristaps Keggi, MD
John Keggi, MD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
spellingShingle Christian Wright, BS
Dale Lambert, BS
Declan Brazil, PhD
Kristaps Keggi, MD
John Keggi, MD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
Reconstructive Review
author_facet Christian Wright, BS
Dale Lambert, BS
Declan Brazil, PhD
Kristaps Keggi, MD
John Keggi, MD
Timothy McTighe, Dr. H.S. (hc)
author_sort Christian Wright, BS
title Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
title_short Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
title_full Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
title_fullStr Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Review of the Zweymuller Femoral Stem
title_sort clinical review of the zweymuller femoral stem
publisher Joint Implant Surgery & Research Foundation
series Reconstructive Review
issn 2331-2262
2331-2270
publishDate 2011-10-01
description This review summarizes published literature from a range of reputable sources regarding hip prostheses (stems) utilized currently in cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty. The critical review of published clinical studies shows Zweymuller style (Alloclassic and SL-Plus) stems in all critical characteristics. Since the introduction of cementless total hip arthroplasty in the 1970s, a range of design philosophies for femoral and acetabular components have demonstrated variable clinical success1,3. Recently cementless components have been yielding clinical results on par and in some cases even surpassing their cemented predecessors2,4,6. As a result, cementless THA is gaining in popularity1,7.  The short-term results of four of the best cementless femoral components recorded in the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register as described by Havelin et al, included the Corail, lMT, Profile and Zweymuller stems with revision for loosening <1% at 4.5 years which was comparable to cemented counterparts.
url https://reconstructivereview.org/ojs/index.php/rr/article/view/5
work_keys_str_mv AT christianwrightbs clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
AT dalelambertbs clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
AT declanbrazilphd clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
AT kristapskeggimd clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
AT johnkeggimd clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
AT timothymctighedrhshc clinicalreviewofthezweymullerfemoralstem
_version_ 1725274970050789376