Acquiring antecedents for reflexives when both L1 and L2 permit long-distance binding

The present study examines second language (L2) acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun (self) by Chinese-speaking learners. The reflexive 'zibun' allows both local and long-distance (LD) binding interpretations. In a recent analysis, 'zibun' is categorized into three types:...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mari Umeda, Kazue Takeda, Makiko Hirakawa, Michiko Fukuda, Yahiro Hirakawa, John Matthews, Neal Snape
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: White Rose University Press 2017-08-01
Series:Journal of the European Second Language Association
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.euroslajournal.org/articles/14
Description
Summary:The present study examines second language (L2) acquisition of the Japanese reflexive zibun (self) by Chinese-speaking learners. The reflexive 'zibun' allows both local and long-distance (LD) binding interpretations. In a recent analysis, 'zibun' is categorized into three types: 'zibun' bound locally by a co-argument, 'zibun' bound by an empathic LD antecedent, and 'zibun' bound by a logophoric LD antecedent. An empathic antecedent is the participant in a sentence that the speaker most empathizes with, whereas, a logophoric antecedent is an individual “whose speech, thoughts, feelings, or general state of consciousness are reported” (Clements, 1975). Chinese also has a reflexive, 'ziji' (self), that can be bound by an LD antecedent, like Japanese 'zibun'. However, Chinese 'ziji' is categorized into two (not three) types: locally bound 'ziji' and 'ziji' bound by a logophoric LD antecedent (Huang, Li & Li, 2009). The goal of this study is to determine whether Chinese-speaking learners are able to distinguish the two different types of LD antecedent for 'zibun' in Japanese. Twenty-eight Chinese-speaking learners of Japanese at advanced levels of proficiency and 36 native speakers of Japanese participated in the study. The results showed that Chinese learners were unable to distinguish between the two types of LD antecedents, showing a persistent presence of first language (L1) transfer.
ISSN:2399-9101