Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion
Animal by-products (ABP) can be valorized via anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas energy generation. The digestate issued from AD process is usually used to fertilize farming land for agricultural activities, which may cause potential sanitary risk to the environment. The European Union (EU) require...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-03-01
|
Series: | Energies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1938 |
id |
doaj-ec84eb99ef6842b1bbab8958815d7c9d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec84eb99ef6842b1bbab8958815d7c9d2021-03-31T23:06:44ZengMDPI AGEnergies1996-10732021-03-01141938193810.3390/en14071938Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic DigestionXiaojun Liu0Thomas Lendormi1Jean-Louis Lanoisellé2Univ. Bretagne Sud, UMR CNRS 6027, IRDL, F-56300 Pontivy, FranceUniv. Bretagne Sud, UMR CNRS 6027, IRDL, F-56300 Pontivy, FranceUniv. Bretagne Sud, UMR CNRS 6027, IRDL, F-56300 Pontivy, FranceAnimal by-products (ABP) can be valorized via anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas energy generation. The digestate issued from AD process is usually used to fertilize farming land for agricultural activities, which may cause potential sanitary risk to the environment. The European Union (EU) requires that certain ABP be thermally pasteurized in order to minimize this sanitary risk. This process is called hygienization, which can be replaced by alternative nonthermal technologies like pulsed electric field (PEF). In the present study, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> ATCC 19433 and <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC 25922 were used as indicator bacteria. Their resistance to thermal pasteurization and PEF treatment were characterized. Results show that <i>Ent. faecalis</i> and <i>E. coli</i> are reduced by 5 log10 in less than 1 min during thermal pasteurization at 70 °C. The critical electric field strength was estimated at 18 kV∙cm<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ent. faecalis</i> and 1 kV∙cm<sup>−1</sup> for <i>E. coli</i>. “G+” bacteria <i>Ent. faecalis</i> are generally more resistant than “G−” bacteria <i>E. coli</i>. AD process also plays an important role in pathogens inactivation, whose performance depends on the microorganisms considered, digestion temperature, residence time, and type of feedstock. Thermophilic digestion is usually more efficient in pathogens removal than mesophilic digestion.https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1938biogas productionanaerobic digestionanimal by-productshygienizationthermal pasteurizationpulsed electric field |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Xiaojun Liu Thomas Lendormi Jean-Louis Lanoisellé |
spellingShingle |
Xiaojun Liu Thomas Lendormi Jean-Louis Lanoisellé Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion Energies biogas production anaerobic digestion animal by-products hygienization thermal pasteurization pulsed electric field |
author_facet |
Xiaojun Liu Thomas Lendormi Jean-Louis Lanoisellé |
author_sort |
Xiaojun Liu |
title |
Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion |
title_short |
Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion |
title_full |
Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion |
title_fullStr |
Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion |
title_full_unstemmed |
Conventional and Innovative Hygienization of Feedstock for Biogas Production: Resistance of Indicator Bacteria to Thermal Pasteurization, Pulsed Electric Field Treatment, and Anaerobic Digestion |
title_sort |
conventional and innovative hygienization of feedstock for biogas production: resistance of indicator bacteria to thermal pasteurization, pulsed electric field treatment, and anaerobic digestion |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Energies |
issn |
1996-1073 |
publishDate |
2021-03-01 |
description |
Animal by-products (ABP) can be valorized via anaerobic digestion (AD) for biogas energy generation. The digestate issued from AD process is usually used to fertilize farming land for agricultural activities, which may cause potential sanitary risk to the environment. The European Union (EU) requires that certain ABP be thermally pasteurized in order to minimize this sanitary risk. This process is called hygienization, which can be replaced by alternative nonthermal technologies like pulsed electric field (PEF). In the present study, <i>Enterococcus faecalis</i> ATCC 19433 and <i>Escherichia coli</i> ATCC 25922 were used as indicator bacteria. Their resistance to thermal pasteurization and PEF treatment were characterized. Results show that <i>Ent. faecalis</i> and <i>E. coli</i> are reduced by 5 log10 in less than 1 min during thermal pasteurization at 70 °C. The critical electric field strength was estimated at 18 kV∙cm<sup>−1</sup> for <i>Ent. faecalis</i> and 1 kV∙cm<sup>−1</sup> for <i>E. coli</i>. “G+” bacteria <i>Ent. faecalis</i> are generally more resistant than “G−” bacteria <i>E. coli</i>. AD process also plays an important role in pathogens inactivation, whose performance depends on the microorganisms considered, digestion temperature, residence time, and type of feedstock. Thermophilic digestion is usually more efficient in pathogens removal than mesophilic digestion. |
topic |
biogas production anaerobic digestion animal by-products hygienization thermal pasteurization pulsed electric field |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/14/7/1938 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT xiaojunliu conventionalandinnovativehygienizationoffeedstockforbiogasproductionresistanceofindicatorbacteriatothermalpasteurizationpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentandanaerobicdigestion AT thomaslendormi conventionalandinnovativehygienizationoffeedstockforbiogasproductionresistanceofindicatorbacteriatothermalpasteurizationpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentandanaerobicdigestion AT jeanlouislanoiselle conventionalandinnovativehygienizationoffeedstockforbiogasproductionresistanceofindicatorbacteriatothermalpasteurizationpulsedelectricfieldtreatmentandanaerobicdigestion |
_version_ |
1724176989217095680 |