Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil
The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states ad...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Western Ontario
2015-05-01
|
Series: | International Indigenous Policy Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1228&context=iipj |
id |
doaj-ec7f31ad47654407a88d7fec0c9cda81 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec7f31ad47654407a88d7fec0c9cda812020-11-25T03:51:11ZengUniversity of Western OntarioInternational Indigenous Policy Journal1916-57811916-57812015-05-01628Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in BrazilNoemi M. Porro0Joaquim Shiraishi Neto1Roberto Porro2Universidade Federal do ParáUniversidade Federal do MaranhãoEmbrapa Amazônia OrientalThe International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address.http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1228&context=iipjtraditional knowledgeAmazonrights |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Noemi M. Porro Joaquim Shiraishi Neto Roberto Porro |
spellingShingle |
Noemi M. Porro Joaquim Shiraishi Neto Roberto Porro Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil International Indigenous Policy Journal traditional knowledge Amazon rights |
author_facet |
Noemi M. Porro Joaquim Shiraishi Neto Roberto Porro |
author_sort |
Noemi M. Porro |
title |
Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil |
title_short |
Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil |
title_full |
Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil |
title_fullStr |
Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil |
title_full_unstemmed |
Traditional Communities as "Subjects of Rights" and the Commoditization of Knowledge in Brazil |
title_sort |
traditional communities as "subjects of rights" and the commoditization of knowledge in brazil |
publisher |
University of Western Ontario |
series |
International Indigenous Policy Journal |
issn |
1916-5781 1916-5781 |
publishDate |
2015-05-01 |
description |
The International Labor Organization (ILO) Convention 169 and the Convention of Biological Diversity (CBD) led signatory state-members to recognize traditional communities as subjects of rights, and no longer as objects of tutelage. However, their implementation may bring new challenges in states adopting market-based decision-making to rule social life. In pluri-ethnic societies in which power differentials are structurally embedded, traditional communities and companies exploring their resources and knowledge have been, historically, unequal and opposed parties. In processes of benefit sharing, these unequal social actors are wrongfully considered equally free subjects of rights in negotiating contracts in supposedly free markets. Erasing historical and structural differences, and assuming equality in an unequal world will only reproduce the inequality that CBD has aimed to address. |
topic |
traditional knowledge Amazon rights |
url |
http://ir.lib.uwo.ca/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1228&context=iipj |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT noemimporro traditionalcommunitiesassubjectsofrightsandthecommoditizationofknowledgeinbrazil AT joaquimshiraishineto traditionalcommunitiesassubjectsofrightsandthecommoditizationofknowledgeinbrazil AT robertoporro traditionalcommunitiesassubjectsofrightsandthecommoditizationofknowledgeinbrazil |
_version_ |
1724488280929468416 |