ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN

Objective: To find out the frequency of the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality among booked and un-booked antenatal women. Methods:  This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Moulvi Ameer Shah Memorial Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan from January 2013 to December 2013 on 2000...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: deeba kalim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Khyber Medical University 2016-02-01
Series:Khyber Medical University Journal
Online Access:https://www.kmuj.kmu.edu.pk/article/view/14087
id doaj-ec69c9e65ca2454cbbe74c0535924366
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec69c9e65ca2454cbbe74c05359243662020-11-25T01:41:06ZengKhyber Medical UniversityKhyber Medical University Journal2305-26432305-26512016-02-017417917914087ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMENdeeba kalim0Moulvi Ameer Shah memorial Hospital PGMI PeshawarObjective: To find out the frequency of the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality among booked and un-booked antenatal women. Methods:  This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Moulvi Ameer Shah Memorial Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan from January 2013 to December 2013 on 2000 randomly selected antenatal women with single pregnancy. Patients were divided in two groups, booked and un-booked. Details of demographic features and antenatal complications were recorded on a pre-designed proforma. Significance of the difference between the booked and un-booked patients was calculated by Chi square test. Results: Out of 2000 antenatal women, 1160 (58%) were booked and 840 (42%) were un-booked. Instrumental delivery rate was 3.6% among un-booked mothers versus 2.3% in booked mothers (p<0.001). Emergency caesarean section rate was 8.89% in un-booked and 4.15% in booked patients (p<0.001). Anemia, Pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature rupture of membranes were observed in 223 (11.15%), 109 (5.45%), 102 (5.1%) un-booked and 90 (4.5%), 38 (1.9%) and 53 (2.65%) booked patients respectively. Birth asphyxia, low Apgar score, low birth weight and septicemia were observed in 170(8.5%), 76(3.8%), 208(10.4%) and 62 (3.1%) neonates of un-booked mothers and in 104(5.2%), 43 (2.15%), 61(3.05%) & 40(2%) neonates of booked mothers (p<0.001). The perinatal mortality rate was 3.6% (n=72) and 1.65% (n=33) in neonates of un-booked and booked mothers respectively (p<0.001). There was no maternal mortality.   Conclusion: The study showed a positive correlation between un-booked mothers and increased risks of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. All the obstetric complications were more common among un-booked mothers.https://www.kmuj.kmu.edu.pk/article/view/14087
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author deeba kalim
spellingShingle deeba kalim
ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
Khyber Medical University Journal
author_facet deeba kalim
author_sort deeba kalim
title ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
title_short ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
title_full ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
title_fullStr ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
title_full_unstemmed ASSESSMENT OF MATERNAL AND PERINATAL COMPLICATIONS AMONG BOOKED AND UN BOOKED ANTENATAL WOMEN
title_sort assessment of maternal and perinatal complications among booked and un booked antenatal women
publisher Khyber Medical University
series Khyber Medical University Journal
issn 2305-2643
2305-2651
publishDate 2016-02-01
description Objective: To find out the frequency of the maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality among booked and un-booked antenatal women. Methods:  This cross-sectional prospective study was conducted at Moulvi Ameer Shah Memorial Hospital, Peshawar, Pakistan from January 2013 to December 2013 on 2000 randomly selected antenatal women with single pregnancy. Patients were divided in two groups, booked and un-booked. Details of demographic features and antenatal complications were recorded on a pre-designed proforma. Significance of the difference between the booked and un-booked patients was calculated by Chi square test. Results: Out of 2000 antenatal women, 1160 (58%) were booked and 840 (42%) were un-booked. Instrumental delivery rate was 3.6% among un-booked mothers versus 2.3% in booked mothers (p<0.001). Emergency caesarean section rate was 8.89% in un-booked and 4.15% in booked patients (p<0.001). Anemia, Pregnancy-induced hypertension and premature rupture of membranes were observed in 223 (11.15%), 109 (5.45%), 102 (5.1%) un-booked and 90 (4.5%), 38 (1.9%) and 53 (2.65%) booked patients respectively. Birth asphyxia, low Apgar score, low birth weight and septicemia were observed in 170(8.5%), 76(3.8%), 208(10.4%) and 62 (3.1%) neonates of un-booked mothers and in 104(5.2%), 43 (2.15%), 61(3.05%) & 40(2%) neonates of booked mothers (p<0.001). The perinatal mortality rate was 3.6% (n=72) and 1.65% (n=33) in neonates of un-booked and booked mothers respectively (p<0.001). There was no maternal mortality.   Conclusion: The study showed a positive correlation between un-booked mothers and increased risks of maternal and fetal adverse outcomes. All the obstetric complications were more common among un-booked mothers.
url https://www.kmuj.kmu.edu.pk/article/view/14087
work_keys_str_mv AT deebakalim assessmentofmaternalandperinatalcomplicationsamongbookedandunbookedantenatalwomen
_version_ 1725042492188917760