Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
First demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual diffe...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Economics and Business Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2 |
id |
doaj-ec5c24a34a2842cdba3c5e898633c204 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec5c24a34a2842cdba3c5e898633c2042021-09-05T17:19:28ZengSciendoEconomics and Business Review2450-00972021-06-017251610.18559/ebr.2021.2.2Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)Białek Michał0Węgrzyn Michał1Meyers Ethan A.2Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527Wrocław, PolandInstitute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527Wrocław, PolandDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo Psychology, Anthropology, Sociology Building, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaFirst demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection could help explain such an effect. No evidence for escalation of commitment amongst the participants was found (N = 365). Participants simply invested more in more promising projects. Also, no evidence was found that numeracy or cognitive reflection predict escalation behaviour. The validity of escalation of commitment behaviour is discussed which suggests that future work should look to explore the boundary conditions of such an effect.https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2escalation of commitmentsunk costnumeracycognitive reflectiond91 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Białek Michał Węgrzyn Michał Meyers Ethan A. |
spellingShingle |
Białek Michał Węgrzyn Michał Meyers Ethan A. Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) Economics and Business Review escalation of commitment sunk cost numeracy cognitive reflection d91 |
author_facet |
Białek Michał Węgrzyn Michał Meyers Ethan A. |
author_sort |
Białek Michał |
title |
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) |
title_short |
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) |
title_full |
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) |
title_fullStr |
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976) |
title_sort |
escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. failed replication and extension of staw (1976) |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Economics and Business Review |
issn |
2450-0097 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
First demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection could help explain such an effect. No evidence for escalation of commitment amongst the participants was found (N = 365). Participants simply invested more in more promising projects. Also, no evidence was found that numeracy or cognitive reflection predict escalation behaviour. The validity of escalation of commitment behaviour is discussed which suggests that future work should look to explore the boundary conditions of such an effect. |
topic |
escalation of commitment sunk cost numeracy cognitive reflection d91 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT białekmichał escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976 AT wegrzynmichał escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976 AT meyersethana escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976 |
_version_ |
1717786666363518976 |