Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)

First demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual diffe...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Białek Michał, Węgrzyn Michał, Meyers Ethan A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sciendo 2021-06-01
Series:Economics and Business Review
Subjects:
d91
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2
id doaj-ec5c24a34a2842cdba3c5e898633c204
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec5c24a34a2842cdba3c5e898633c2042021-09-05T17:19:28ZengSciendoEconomics and Business Review2450-00972021-06-017251610.18559/ebr.2021.2.2Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)Białek Michał0Węgrzyn Michał1Meyers Ethan A.2Institute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527Wrocław, PolandInstitute of Psychology, University of Wrocław, ul. Dawida 1, 50-527Wrocław, PolandDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo Psychology, Anthropology, Sociology Building, 200 University Ave W, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, CanadaFirst demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection could help explain such an effect. No evidence for escalation of commitment amongst the participants was found (N = 365). Participants simply invested more in more promising projects. Also, no evidence was found that numeracy or cognitive reflection predict escalation behaviour. The validity of escalation of commitment behaviour is discussed which suggests that future work should look to explore the boundary conditions of such an effect.https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2escalation of commitmentsunk costnumeracycognitive reflectiond91
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Białek Michał
Węgrzyn Michał
Meyers Ethan A.
spellingShingle Białek Michał
Węgrzyn Michał
Meyers Ethan A.
Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
Economics and Business Review
escalation of commitment
sunk cost
numeracy
cognitive reflection
d91
author_facet Białek Michał
Węgrzyn Michał
Meyers Ethan A.
author_sort Białek Michał
title Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
title_short Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
title_full Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
title_fullStr Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
title_full_unstemmed Escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. Failed replication and extension of Staw (1976)
title_sort escalation of commitment is independent of numeracy and cognitive reflection. failed replication and extension of staw (1976)
publisher Sciendo
series Economics and Business Review
issn 2450-0097
publishDate 2021-06-01
description First demonstrated by Staw (1976), escalation of commitment is the tendency for an individual to increase their commitment to a failing course of action when they are personally responsible for the negative consequences. An attempt was made to replicate this finding and test whether individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection could help explain such an effect. No evidence for escalation of commitment amongst the participants was found (N = 365). Participants simply invested more in more promising projects. Also, no evidence was found that numeracy or cognitive reflection predict escalation behaviour. The validity of escalation of commitment behaviour is discussed which suggests that future work should look to explore the boundary conditions of such an effect.
topic escalation of commitment
sunk cost
numeracy
cognitive reflection
d91
url https://doi.org/10.18559/ebr.2021.2.2
work_keys_str_mv AT białekmichał escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976
AT wegrzynmichał escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976
AT meyersethana escalationofcommitmentisindependentofnumeracyandcognitivereflectionfailedreplicationandextensionofstaw1976
_version_ 1717786666363518976