Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis

Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Although recent studies have introduced BTA septal injection as an alternative method, the conventional localization for the injection of BTA in patients with AR is still the nasal turbi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sayed Mojtaba Abtahi, Sayed Mostafa Hashemi, Sayed Hamidreza Abtahi, Bagher Bastani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2013;volume=18;issue=5;spage=400;epage=404;aulast=Abtahi
id doaj-ec551a559211453cb7f503c63640122c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec551a559211453cb7f503c63640122c2020-11-24T21:02:01ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362013-01-01185400404Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitisSayed Mojtaba AbtahiSayed Mostafa HashemiSayed Hamidreza AbtahiBagher BastaniBackground: Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Although recent studies have introduced BTA septal injection as an alternative method, the conventional localization for the injection of BTA in patients with AR is still the nasal turbinates. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of septal BTA injection with turbinal BTA injection in patients with AR. Materials and Methods: This open‑label study was performed on 50 patients with AR who were randomly allocated to septal and turbinal BTA injection groups. All patients received an injection of 40 U of BTA (Dysport;, Ipsen Ltd, Maidenhead, UK) in each side of the nose and were followed for 8 weeks. Prior to the intervention and 8 weeks later, symptom severity and quality of life scores were calculated using the AR symptom severity and Rhinasthma questionnaires respectively. Results: Comparison of pre‑ and post‑treatment symptom severity scores within each group showed a significant reduction of total symptom severity score and severity of sneezing, rhinorrhea, and congestion in both groups (P < 0.05). However, post ‑treatment symptom severity scores were not significantly different between two groups (P > 0.05). Both methods have improved the quality of life of subjects significantly (P < 0.05). Significantly more patients in the turbinal injection group reported adverse effects (four patient′s vs. one, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Although both septal and turbinal BTA injections are effective on patients with AR, septal administration of BTA could be safer and easier method. However, further investigations are required to achieve more accurate results.http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2013;volume=18;issue=5;spage=400;epage=404;aulast=AbtahiAllergic rhinitisbotulinum toxin Aquality of life
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sayed Mojtaba Abtahi
Sayed Mostafa Hashemi
Sayed Hamidreza Abtahi
Bagher Bastani
spellingShingle Sayed Mojtaba Abtahi
Sayed Mostafa Hashemi
Sayed Hamidreza Abtahi
Bagher Bastani
Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Allergic rhinitis
botulinum toxin A
quality of life
author_facet Sayed Mojtaba Abtahi
Sayed Mostafa Hashemi
Sayed Hamidreza Abtahi
Bagher Bastani
author_sort Sayed Mojtaba Abtahi
title Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
title_short Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
title_full Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
title_fullStr Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
title_full_unstemmed Septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin A in patients with allergic rhinitis
title_sort septal injection in comparison with inferior turbinates injection of botulinum toxin a in patients with allergic rhinitis
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
publishDate 2013-01-01
description Background: Botulinum toxin A (BTA) is a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of allergic rhinitis (AR). Although recent studies have introduced BTA septal injection as an alternative method, the conventional localization for the injection of BTA in patients with AR is still the nasal turbinates. This study was designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of septal BTA injection with turbinal BTA injection in patients with AR. Materials and Methods: This open‑label study was performed on 50 patients with AR who were randomly allocated to septal and turbinal BTA injection groups. All patients received an injection of 40 U of BTA (Dysport;, Ipsen Ltd, Maidenhead, UK) in each side of the nose and were followed for 8 weeks. Prior to the intervention and 8 weeks later, symptom severity and quality of life scores were calculated using the AR symptom severity and Rhinasthma questionnaires respectively. Results: Comparison of pre‑ and post‑treatment symptom severity scores within each group showed a significant reduction of total symptom severity score and severity of sneezing, rhinorrhea, and congestion in both groups (P < 0.05). However, post ‑treatment symptom severity scores were not significantly different between two groups (P > 0.05). Both methods have improved the quality of life of subjects significantly (P < 0.05). Significantly more patients in the turbinal injection group reported adverse effects (four patient′s vs. one, P < 0.05). Conclusion: Although both septal and turbinal BTA injections are effective on patients with AR, septal administration of BTA could be safer and easier method. However, further investigations are required to achieve more accurate results.
topic Allergic rhinitis
botulinum toxin A
quality of life
url http://www.jmsjournal.net/article.asp?issn=1735-1995;year=2013;volume=18;issue=5;spage=400;epage=404;aulast=Abtahi
work_keys_str_mv AT sayedmojtabaabtahi septalinjectionincomparisonwithinferiorturbinatesinjectionofbotulinumtoxinainpatientswithallergicrhinitis
AT sayedmostafahashemi septalinjectionincomparisonwithinferiorturbinatesinjectionofbotulinumtoxinainpatientswithallergicrhinitis
AT sayedhamidrezaabtahi septalinjectionincomparisonwithinferiorturbinatesinjectionofbotulinumtoxinainpatientswithallergicrhinitis
AT bagherbastani septalinjectionincomparisonwithinferiorturbinatesinjectionofbotulinumtoxinainpatientswithallergicrhinitis
_version_ 1716776970626269184