On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures

The architecture of a system describes the system’s overall organization into components and connections between those components. With the emergence of mobile computing, dynamic architectures became increasingly important. In such architectures, components may appear or disappear, and connections m...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: D. Marmsoler, M. Gleirscher
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi 2016-12-01
Series:Scientific Annals of Computer Science
Online Access:http://www.info.uaic.ro/bin/download/Annals/XXVI2/XXVI2_2.pdf
id doaj-ec4756cb381241739dd0a38f3526a72a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec4756cb381241739dd0a38f3526a72a2020-11-25T01:13:31ZengAlexandru Ioan Cuza University of IasiScientific Annals of Computer Science1843-81212248-26952016-12-01XXVI218724810.7561/SACS.2016.2.187On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic ArchitecturesD. MarmsolerM. GleirscherThe architecture of a system describes the system’s overall organization into components and connections between those components. With the emergence of mobile computing, dynamic architectures became increasingly important. In such architectures, components may appear or disappear, and connections may change over time. Despite the growing importance of dynamic architectures, the specification of properties for those architectures remains a challenge. To address this problem, we introduce the notion of configuration traces to model properties of dynamic architectures. Then, we characterize activation, connection, and behavior properties as special sets of configuration traces. We then show soundness and relative completeness of our characterization, i.e., we show that the intersection of an activation, connection, and behavior property contains all relevant configuration traces and that (almost) every property can be separated into these classes. Configuration traces can be used to specify general properties of dynamic architectures and the separation into different classes provides a systematic way for their specification. To evaluate our approach we apply it to the specification and verification of the Blackboard architecture pattern.http://www.info.uaic.ro/bin/download/Annals/XXVI2/XXVI2_2.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author D. Marmsoler
M. Gleirscher
spellingShingle D. Marmsoler
M. Gleirscher
On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
Scientific Annals of Computer Science
author_facet D. Marmsoler
M. Gleirscher
author_sort D. Marmsoler
title On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
title_short On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
title_full On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
title_fullStr On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
title_full_unstemmed On Activation, Connection, and Behavior in Dynamic Architectures
title_sort on activation, connection, and behavior in dynamic architectures
publisher Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi
series Scientific Annals of Computer Science
issn 1843-8121
2248-2695
publishDate 2016-12-01
description The architecture of a system describes the system’s overall organization into components and connections between those components. With the emergence of mobile computing, dynamic architectures became increasingly important. In such architectures, components may appear or disappear, and connections may change over time. Despite the growing importance of dynamic architectures, the specification of properties for those architectures remains a challenge. To address this problem, we introduce the notion of configuration traces to model properties of dynamic architectures. Then, we characterize activation, connection, and behavior properties as special sets of configuration traces. We then show soundness and relative completeness of our characterization, i.e., we show that the intersection of an activation, connection, and behavior property contains all relevant configuration traces and that (almost) every property can be separated into these classes. Configuration traces can be used to specify general properties of dynamic architectures and the separation into different classes provides a systematic way for their specification. To evaluate our approach we apply it to the specification and verification of the Blackboard architecture pattern.
url http://www.info.uaic.ro/bin/download/Annals/XXVI2/XXVI2_2.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT dmarmsoler onactivationconnectionandbehaviorindynamicarchitectures
AT mgleirscher onactivationconnectionandbehaviorindynamicarchitectures
_version_ 1725161833701048320