Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification

The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Emine Yaman, Abdulhamit Subasi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi Limited 2019-01-01
Series:BioMed Research International
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506
id doaj-ec3b9481af4d4c6091de5622576d7c1c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec3b9481af4d4c6091de5622576d7c1c2020-11-24T21:50:56ZengHindawi LimitedBioMed Research International2314-61332314-61412019-01-01201910.1155/2019/91525069152506Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal ClassificationEmine Yaman0Abdulhamit Subasi1International University of Sarajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and HerzegovinaEffat University, College of Engineering, Jeddah 21478, Saudi ArabiaThe neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers’ efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Emine Yaman
Abdulhamit Subasi
spellingShingle Emine Yaman
Abdulhamit Subasi
Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
BioMed Research International
author_facet Emine Yaman
Abdulhamit Subasi
author_sort Emine Yaman
title Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_short Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_full Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_fullStr Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Bagging and Boosting Ensemble Machine Learning Methods for Automated EMG Signal Classification
title_sort comparison of bagging and boosting ensemble machine learning methods for automated emg signal classification
publisher Hindawi Limited
series BioMed Research International
issn 2314-6133
2314-6141
publishDate 2019-01-01
description The neuromuscular disorders are diagnosed using electromyographic (EMG) signals. Machine learning algorithms are employed as a decision support system to diagnose neuromuscular disorders. This paper compares bagging and boosting ensemble learning methods to classify EMG signals automatically. Even though ensemble classifiers’ efficacy in relation to real-life issues has been presented in numerous studies, there are almost no studies which focus on the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to assess the feasibility of bagging and boosting ensemble classifiers to diagnose neuromuscular disorders through the use of EMG signals. It should be understood that there are three steps to this method, where the step number one is to calculate the wavelet packed coefficients (WPC) for every type of EMG signal. After this, it is necessary to calculate statistical values of WPC so that the distribution of wavelet coefficients could be demonstrated. In the last step, an ensemble classifier used the extracted features as an input of the classifier to diagnose the neuromuscular disorders. Experimental results showed the ensemble classifiers achieved better performance for diagnosis of neuromuscular disorders. Results are promising and showed that the AdaBoost with random forest ensemble method achieved an accuracy of 99.08%, F-measure 0.99, AUC 1, and kappa statistic 0.99.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/9152506
work_keys_str_mv AT emineyaman comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification
AT abdulhamitsubasi comparisonofbaggingandboostingensemblemachinelearningmethodsforautomatedemgsignalclassification
_version_ 1725881478387073024