The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield
Experimental samples of biological products based on endophytic microorganism strains were tested on sugar beet root plants. The studies were carried out at ZAI Agrofirm LLC, Zay District, the Republic of Tatarstan. The most effective preparations applied at the early stages (3–4 leaf phase) were RE...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
EDP Sciences
2020-01-01
|
Series: | BIO Web of Conferences |
Online Access: | https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2020/01/bioconf_fies2020_00250/bioconf_fies2020_00250.html |
id |
doaj-ec2f3a0a1b514bd29d24e492194d2989 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec2f3a0a1b514bd29d24e492194d29892021-04-02T19:48:24ZengEDP SciencesBIO Web of Conferences2117-44582020-01-01170025010.1051/bioconf/20201700250bioconf_fies2020_00250The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yieldMinikayev RogatGaffarova LiliaExperimental samples of biological products based on endophytic microorganism strains were tested on sugar beet root plants. The studies were carried out at ZAI Agrofirm LLC, Zay District, the Republic of Tatarstan. The most effective preparations applied at the early stages (3–4 leaf phase) were RECB – 31 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 44 B (2.0 l/ha), RECB – 50 B (2.0 l/ha), and RECB – 74 B (2.0 l/ha). Biological preparations applied in the row closing leaf phase have an advantage over chemical preparations when applying RECB – 14 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 31 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (2.0 l/ha). At the late vegetation stages, experimental preparations increased the yield. A significant increase was observed when applying RECB – 95 B (1.5 l/ha).https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2020/01/bioconf_fies2020_00250/bioconf_fies2020_00250.html |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Minikayev Rogat Gaffarova Lilia |
spellingShingle |
Minikayev Rogat Gaffarova Lilia The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield BIO Web of Conferences |
author_facet |
Minikayev Rogat Gaffarova Lilia |
author_sort |
Minikayev Rogat |
title |
The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
title_short |
The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
title_full |
The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
title_fullStr |
The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
title_full_unstemmed |
The effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
title_sort |
effect of bacterial preparations on the growth, development and quality indicators of sugar beet yield |
publisher |
EDP Sciences |
series |
BIO Web of Conferences |
issn |
2117-4458 |
publishDate |
2020-01-01 |
description |
Experimental samples of biological products based on endophytic microorganism strains were tested on sugar beet root plants. The studies were carried out at ZAI Agrofirm LLC, Zay District, the Republic of Tatarstan. The most effective preparations applied at the early stages (3–4 leaf phase) were RECB – 31 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 44 B (2.0 l/ha), RECB – 50 B (2.0 l/ha), and RECB – 74 B (2.0 l/ha). Biological preparations applied in the row closing leaf phase have an advantage over chemical preparations when applying RECB – 14 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 31 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (1.5 l/ha), RECB – 74 B (2.0 l/ha). At the late vegetation stages, experimental preparations increased the yield. A significant increase was observed when applying RECB – 95 B (1.5 l/ha). |
url |
https://www.bio-conferences.org/articles/bioconf/full_html/2020/01/bioconf_fies2020_00250/bioconf_fies2020_00250.html |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT minikayevrogat theeffectofbacterialpreparationsonthegrowthdevelopmentandqualityindicatorsofsugarbeetyield AT gaffarovalilia theeffectofbacterialpreparationsonthegrowthdevelopmentandqualityindicatorsofsugarbeetyield AT minikayevrogat effectofbacterialpreparationsonthegrowthdevelopmentandqualityindicatorsofsugarbeetyield AT gaffarovalilia effectofbacterialpreparationsonthegrowthdevelopmentandqualityindicatorsofsugarbeetyield |
_version_ |
1721548423671316480 |