Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?

The recent introduction of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a diagnostic category may cause negative social reactions (i.e. public stigma). Vignette experiments demonstrate that persons with both PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis elicit more public stigma than persons who experience integrated grief...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Judith Gonschor, Maarten C. Eisma, Antonia Barke, Bettina K. Doering, Manuel Fernández-Alcántara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2020-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485774/?tool=EBI
id doaj-ec28ed1da6a640ad92d5cd956499917f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec28ed1da6a640ad92d5cd956499917f2020-11-25T03:40:32ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032020-01-01159Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?Judith GonschorMaarten C. EismaAntonia BarkeBettina K. DoeringManuel Fernández-AlcántaraThe recent introduction of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a diagnostic category may cause negative social reactions (i.e. public stigma). Vignette experiments demonstrate that persons with both PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis elicit more public stigma than persons who experience integrated grief. However, the strength of the influence of the diagnosis itself remains unclear: We aimed to clarify if the diagnostic label PGD produces additional public stigma beyond PGD symptoms. We further compared whether public stigma varies between the label PGD and the label major depressive episode (MDE) (when PGD symptoms are present) and if gender of the bereaved person influences public stigma or moderates the aforementioned effects. Eight-hundred fifty-two participants (77% female; Mage = 32.6 years, SD = 13.3) were randomly assigned to read online one of eight vignettes describing either a bereaved male or female, with PGD symptoms and PGD diagnosis; PGD symptoms and MDE diagnosis; PGD symptoms and no diagnosis, or no PGD symptoms and no diagnosis (i.e., integrated grief). Following the vignettes, participants indicated which negative characteristics they ascribed to the person, their emotional reactions, and preferred social distance from the person. People with PGD symptoms and PGD (or MDE) diagnosis were attributed more negative characteristics, and elicited more negative emotions and a stronger desire for social distance than people with integrated grief. However, public stigma did not differ for people with both PGD symptoms and diagnosis compared to people only experiencing PGD symptoms. Gender of the bereaved only had an influence on desired social distance, which was larger towards men. Helping severely distressed bereaved people (regardless of diagnostic status) cope with negative social reactions may help them adapt to bereavement. Results demonstrate that the experience of severe grief reactions, yet not a diagnostic label per se, causes public stigma.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485774/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Judith Gonschor
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
Bettina K. Doering
Manuel Fernández-Alcántara
spellingShingle Judith Gonschor
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
Bettina K. Doering
Manuel Fernández-Alcántara
Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
PLoS ONE
author_facet Judith Gonschor
Maarten C. Eisma
Antonia Barke
Bettina K. Doering
Manuel Fernández-Alcántara
author_sort Judith Gonschor
title Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
title_short Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
title_full Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
title_fullStr Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
title_full_unstemmed Public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: Does diagnostic labeling matter?
title_sort public stigma towards prolonged grief disorder: does diagnostic labeling matter?
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2020-01-01
description The recent introduction of prolonged grief disorder (PGD) as a diagnostic category may cause negative social reactions (i.e. public stigma). Vignette experiments demonstrate that persons with both PGD symptoms and a PGD diagnosis elicit more public stigma than persons who experience integrated grief. However, the strength of the influence of the diagnosis itself remains unclear: We aimed to clarify if the diagnostic label PGD produces additional public stigma beyond PGD symptoms. We further compared whether public stigma varies between the label PGD and the label major depressive episode (MDE) (when PGD symptoms are present) and if gender of the bereaved person influences public stigma or moderates the aforementioned effects. Eight-hundred fifty-two participants (77% female; Mage = 32.6 years, SD = 13.3) were randomly assigned to read online one of eight vignettes describing either a bereaved male or female, with PGD symptoms and PGD diagnosis; PGD symptoms and MDE diagnosis; PGD symptoms and no diagnosis, or no PGD symptoms and no diagnosis (i.e., integrated grief). Following the vignettes, participants indicated which negative characteristics they ascribed to the person, their emotional reactions, and preferred social distance from the person. People with PGD symptoms and PGD (or MDE) diagnosis were attributed more negative characteristics, and elicited more negative emotions and a stronger desire for social distance than people with integrated grief. However, public stigma did not differ for people with both PGD symptoms and diagnosis compared to people only experiencing PGD symptoms. Gender of the bereaved only had an influence on desired social distance, which was larger towards men. Helping severely distressed bereaved people (regardless of diagnostic status) cope with negative social reactions may help them adapt to bereavement. Results demonstrate that the experience of severe grief reactions, yet not a diagnostic label per se, causes public stigma.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7485774/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT judithgonschor publicstigmatowardsprolongedgriefdisorderdoesdiagnosticlabelingmatter
AT maartenceisma publicstigmatowardsprolongedgriefdisorderdoesdiagnosticlabelingmatter
AT antoniabarke publicstigmatowardsprolongedgriefdisorderdoesdiagnosticlabelingmatter
AT bettinakdoering publicstigmatowardsprolongedgriefdisorderdoesdiagnosticlabelingmatter
AT manuelfernandezalcantara publicstigmatowardsprolongedgriefdisorderdoesdiagnosticlabelingmatter
_version_ 1724534201292685312