Interpréter une théorie physique
Physical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
Université de Lille
2013-03-01
|
Series: | Methodos |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118 |
id |
doaj-ec25ada54b6949b69caa10ccd88e232d |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec25ada54b6949b69caa10ccd88e232d2020-11-24T20:46:38ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792013-03-011310.4000/methodos.3118Interpréter une théorie physiqueThomas BoyerAnouk BarberoussePhysical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don't “speak” about the phenomena. An interpretation is required. In this article, we are interested in the interpretation which a physical theory needs so as to fulfill its role. We start by making explicit a traditional distinction: the “lean” interpretation (a simple instrument which allows the symbols of the theory to receive a physical meaning, strictly limited to the experimental results) differs from the “rich” interpretation (which makes up an image of the world compatible with the way the theory mathematically describes the experimental results). Our aim in this article is to show that this distinction should be amended. We rely on the example of Quantum Mechanics, but the distinction intends to be general, for any physical theory.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118interpretationmeaningphysical theoryquantum mechanicssymbolscontext |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
fra |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Thomas Boyer Anouk Barberousse |
spellingShingle |
Thomas Boyer Anouk Barberousse Interpréter une théorie physique Methodos interpretation meaning physical theory quantum mechanics symbols context |
author_facet |
Thomas Boyer Anouk Barberousse |
author_sort |
Thomas Boyer |
title |
Interpréter une théorie physique |
title_short |
Interpréter une théorie physique |
title_full |
Interpréter une théorie physique |
title_fullStr |
Interpréter une théorie physique |
title_full_unstemmed |
Interpréter une théorie physique |
title_sort |
interpréter une théorie physique |
publisher |
Université de Lille |
series |
Methodos |
issn |
1769-7379 |
publishDate |
2013-03-01 |
description |
Physical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don't “speak” about the phenomena. An interpretation is required. In this article, we are interested in the interpretation which a physical theory needs so as to fulfill its role. We start by making explicit a traditional distinction: the “lean” interpretation (a simple instrument which allows the symbols of the theory to receive a physical meaning, strictly limited to the experimental results) differs from the “rich” interpretation (which makes up an image of the world compatible with the way the theory mathematically describes the experimental results). Our aim in this article is to show that this distinction should be amended. We rely on the example of Quantum Mechanics, but the distinction intends to be general, for any physical theory. |
topic |
interpretation meaning physical theory quantum mechanics symbols context |
url |
http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT thomasboyer interpreterunetheoriephysique AT anoukbarberousse interpreterunetheoriephysique |
_version_ |
1716812076247154688 |