Interpréter une théorie physique

Physical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don�...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thomas Boyer, Anouk Barberousse
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Université de Lille 2013-03-01
Series:Methodos
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118
id doaj-ec25ada54b6949b69caa10ccd88e232d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec25ada54b6949b69caa10ccd88e232d2020-11-24T20:46:38ZfraUniversité de LilleMethodos1769-73792013-03-011310.4000/methodos.3118Interpréter une théorie physiqueThomas BoyerAnouk BarberoussePhysical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don't “speak” about the phenomena. An interpretation is required. In this article, we are interested in the interpretation which a physical theory needs so as to fulfill its role. We start by making explicit a traditional distinction: the “lean” interpretation (a simple instrument which allows the symbols of the theory to receive a physical meaning, strictly limited to the experimental results) differs from the “rich” interpretation (which makes up an image of the world compatible with the way the theory mathematically describes the experimental results). Our aim in this article is to show that this distinction should be amended. We rely on the example of Quantum Mechanics, but the distinction intends to be general, for any physical theory.http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118interpretationmeaningphysical theoryquantum mechanicssymbolscontext
collection DOAJ
language fra
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Thomas Boyer
Anouk Barberousse
spellingShingle Thomas Boyer
Anouk Barberousse
Interpréter une théorie physique
Methodos
interpretation
meaning
physical theory
quantum mechanics
symbols
context
author_facet Thomas Boyer
Anouk Barberousse
author_sort Thomas Boyer
title Interpréter une théorie physique
title_short Interpréter une théorie physique
title_full Interpréter une théorie physique
title_fullStr Interpréter une théorie physique
title_full_unstemmed Interpréter une théorie physique
title_sort interpréter une théorie physique
publisher Université de Lille
series Methodos
issn 1769-7379
publishDate 2013-03-01
description Physical theories are nowadays very mathematized, and what scientists manipulate so as to describe, predict and control the phenomena, are (in part) equations, which consist in many mathematical symbols. These mathematical objects don't have any physical signification by themselves: they don't “speak” about the phenomena. An interpretation is required. In this article, we are interested in the interpretation which a physical theory needs so as to fulfill its role. We start by making explicit a traditional distinction: the “lean” interpretation (a simple instrument which allows the symbols of the theory to receive a physical meaning, strictly limited to the experimental results) differs from the “rich” interpretation (which makes up an image of the world compatible with the way the theory mathematically describes the experimental results). Our aim in this article is to show that this distinction should be amended. We rely on the example of Quantum Mechanics, but the distinction intends to be general, for any physical theory.
topic interpretation
meaning
physical theory
quantum mechanics
symbols
context
url http://journals.openedition.org/methodos/3118
work_keys_str_mv AT thomasboyer interpreterunetheoriephysique
AT anoukbarberousse interpreterunetheoriephysique
_version_ 1716812076247154688