Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.

This study investigates the temporal changes in development of technology convergence networks by institution type, i.e., public research institute (PRI), university and industry. Using the co-classification of technological domains of patents, we identified technology convergence of Korean patents,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jae Young Choi, Seongkyoon Jeong, Jung-Kyu Jung
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2018-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5805267?pdf=render
id doaj-ec0bc38f67f6451096d206a6751a13aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec0bc38f67f6451096d206a6751a13aa2020-11-24T22:17:19ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032018-01-01132e019219510.1371/journal.pone.0192195Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.Jae Young ChoiSeongkyoon JeongJung-Kyu JungThis study investigates the temporal changes in development of technology convergence networks by institution type, i.e., public research institute (PRI), university and industry. Using the co-classification of technological domains of patents, we identified technology convergence of Korean patents, which were filed at Korea Intellectual Properties Office (KIPO) from 1997 to 2011. We conducted a network analysis at the technology level to search for the key technology fields and frequent instances of technology convergence. The results show that technology convergence networks have grown significantly in the recent period regardless of the institution type. While industries started to conspicuously engage in technology convergence in the late 1990s, universities or PRIs did not do so until the mid-2000s. This discrepancy in the phase of technology convergence is attributed to the temporal difference in R&D stage (e.g., basic research and commercial product development). Our findings imply that corporal and governmental R&D management decision on promising technology fields will be more effective if the decision makers carefully consider the type of R&D entity in analyzing technological landscapes.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5805267?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jae Young Choi
Seongkyoon Jeong
Jung-Kyu Jung
spellingShingle Jae Young Choi
Seongkyoon Jeong
Jung-Kyu Jung
Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jae Young Choi
Seongkyoon Jeong
Jung-Kyu Jung
author_sort Jae Young Choi
title Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
title_short Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
title_full Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
title_fullStr Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
title_full_unstemmed Evolution of technology convergence networks in Korea: Characteristics of temporal changes in R&D according to institution type.
title_sort evolution of technology convergence networks in korea: characteristics of temporal changes in r&d according to institution type.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This study investigates the temporal changes in development of technology convergence networks by institution type, i.e., public research institute (PRI), university and industry. Using the co-classification of technological domains of patents, we identified technology convergence of Korean patents, which were filed at Korea Intellectual Properties Office (KIPO) from 1997 to 2011. We conducted a network analysis at the technology level to search for the key technology fields and frequent instances of technology convergence. The results show that technology convergence networks have grown significantly in the recent period regardless of the institution type. While industries started to conspicuously engage in technology convergence in the late 1990s, universities or PRIs did not do so until the mid-2000s. This discrepancy in the phase of technology convergence is attributed to the temporal difference in R&D stage (e.g., basic research and commercial product development). Our findings imply that corporal and governmental R&D management decision on promising technology fields will be more effective if the decision makers carefully consider the type of R&D entity in analyzing technological landscapes.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5805267?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT jaeyoungchoi evolutionoftechnologyconvergencenetworksinkoreacharacteristicsoftemporalchangesinrdaccordingtoinstitutiontype
AT seongkyoonjeong evolutionoftechnologyconvergencenetworksinkoreacharacteristicsoftemporalchangesinrdaccordingtoinstitutiontype
AT jungkyujung evolutionoftechnologyconvergencenetworksinkoreacharacteristicsoftemporalchangesinrdaccordingtoinstitutiontype
_version_ 1725785532358721536