The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations

Wave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alberto Alberello, Alessandro Iafrati
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2019-04-01
Series:Fluids
Subjects:
CFD
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68
id doaj-ec09dd68f49d4862aa96679da1835d90
record_format Article
spelling doaj-ec09dd68f49d4862aa96679da1835d902020-11-25T00:06:36ZengMDPI AGFluids2311-55212019-04-01426810.3390/fluids4020068fluids4020068The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical SimulationsAlberto Alberello0Alessandro Iafrati1School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaCNR-INM, Institute of Marine Engineering, 00128 Rome, ItalyWave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computational advances, accurate numerical simulations of the complex breaking process remain challenging. Validation of numerical codes is routinely performed against experimental observations of the surface elevation. However, it is still uncertain whether simulations can accurately reproduce the velocity field under breaking waves due to the lack of ad-hoc measurements. In the present work, the velocity field recorded with a Particle Image Velocimetry method during experiments conducted in a unidirectional wave tank is directly compared to the results of a corresponding numerical simulation performed with a Navier–Stokes (NS) solver. It is found that simulations underpredict the velocity close to the wave crest compared to measurements. Higher resolutions seem necessary in order to capture the most relevant details of the flow.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68waveswater waveswave breakingNavier–StokesCFDparticle image velocimetry
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Alberto Alberello
Alessandro Iafrati
spellingShingle Alberto Alberello
Alessandro Iafrati
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
Fluids
waves
water waves
wave breaking
Navier–Stokes
CFD
particle image velocimetry
author_facet Alberto Alberello
Alessandro Iafrati
author_sort Alberto Alberello
title The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
title_short The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
title_full The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
title_fullStr The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
title_full_unstemmed The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
title_sort velocity field underneath a breaking rogue wave: laboratory experiments versus numerical simulations
publisher MDPI AG
series Fluids
issn 2311-5521
publishDate 2019-04-01
description Wave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computational advances, accurate numerical simulations of the complex breaking process remain challenging. Validation of numerical codes is routinely performed against experimental observations of the surface elevation. However, it is still uncertain whether simulations can accurately reproduce the velocity field under breaking waves due to the lack of ad-hoc measurements. In the present work, the velocity field recorded with a Particle Image Velocimetry method during experiments conducted in a unidirectional wave tank is directly compared to the results of a corresponding numerical simulation performed with a Navier–Stokes (NS) solver. It is found that simulations underpredict the velocity close to the wave crest compared to measurements. Higher resolutions seem necessary in order to capture the most relevant details of the flow.
topic waves
water waves
wave breaking
Navier–Stokes
CFD
particle image velocimetry
url https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68
work_keys_str_mv AT albertoalberello thevelocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations
AT alessandroiafrati thevelocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations
AT albertoalberello velocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations
AT alessandroiafrati velocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations
_version_ 1725421254939246592