The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations
Wave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computati...
Main Authors: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Fluids |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68 |
id |
doaj-ec09dd68f49d4862aa96679da1835d90 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-ec09dd68f49d4862aa96679da1835d902020-11-25T00:06:36ZengMDPI AGFluids2311-55212019-04-01426810.3390/fluids4020068fluids4020068The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical SimulationsAlberto Alberello0Alessandro Iafrati1School of Mathematical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, AustraliaCNR-INM, Institute of Marine Engineering, 00128 Rome, ItalyWave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computational advances, accurate numerical simulations of the complex breaking process remain challenging. Validation of numerical codes is routinely performed against experimental observations of the surface elevation. However, it is still uncertain whether simulations can accurately reproduce the velocity field under breaking waves due to the lack of ad-hoc measurements. In the present work, the velocity field recorded with a Particle Image Velocimetry method during experiments conducted in a unidirectional wave tank is directly compared to the results of a corresponding numerical simulation performed with a Navier–Stokes (NS) solver. It is found that simulations underpredict the velocity close to the wave crest compared to measurements. Higher resolutions seem necessary in order to capture the most relevant details of the flow.https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68waveswater waveswave breakingNavier–StokesCFDparticle image velocimetry |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Alberto Alberello Alessandro Iafrati |
spellingShingle |
Alberto Alberello Alessandro Iafrati The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations Fluids waves water waves wave breaking Navier–Stokes CFD particle image velocimetry |
author_facet |
Alberto Alberello Alessandro Iafrati |
author_sort |
Alberto Alberello |
title |
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations |
title_short |
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations |
title_full |
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations |
title_fullStr |
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Velocity Field Underneath a Breaking Rogue Wave: Laboratory Experiments Versus Numerical Simulations |
title_sort |
velocity field underneath a breaking rogue wave: laboratory experiments versus numerical simulations |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Fluids |
issn |
2311-5521 |
publishDate |
2019-04-01 |
description |
Wave breaking is the most characteristic feature of the ocean surface. Physical investigations (in the field and at laboratory scale) and numerical simulations have studied the driving mechanisms that lead to wave breaking and its effects on hydrodynamic loads on marine structures. Despite computational advances, accurate numerical simulations of the complex breaking process remain challenging. Validation of numerical codes is routinely performed against experimental observations of the surface elevation. However, it is still uncertain whether simulations can accurately reproduce the velocity field under breaking waves due to the lack of ad-hoc measurements. In the present work, the velocity field recorded with a Particle Image Velocimetry method during experiments conducted in a unidirectional wave tank is directly compared to the results of a corresponding numerical simulation performed with a Navier–Stokes (NS) solver. It is found that simulations underpredict the velocity close to the wave crest compared to measurements. Higher resolutions seem necessary in order to capture the most relevant details of the flow. |
topic |
waves water waves wave breaking Navier–Stokes CFD particle image velocimetry |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2311-5521/4/2/68 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT albertoalberello thevelocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations AT alessandroiafrati thevelocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations AT albertoalberello velocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations AT alessandroiafrati velocityfieldunderneathabreakingroguewavelaboratoryexperimentsversusnumericalsimulations |
_version_ |
1725421254939246592 |